General Discussion

Atticus

(15,124 posts) Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:15 PM Nov 2012

Haley Barbour's Rx for GOP was a "proctology exam." Know what they found up there?

Obama's foot!!!

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Haley Barbour's Rx for GOP was a "proctology exam." Know what they found up there? (Original Post) Atticus Nov 2012 OP

Either that, or a hot poker meow2u3 Nov 2012 #1

A big plug of Trump? nt hifiguy Nov 2012 #2

Along with Mitt's head. TheCowsCameHome Nov 2012 #3

A hornets nest? louslobbs Nov 2012 #4

Rove's noggin. lpbk2713 Nov 2012 #5

oooooo I was going to answer "their own head" underpants Nov 2012 #6

The medical term is cranio-rectal impaction, hifiguy Nov 2012 #8

I thought the 'proctology exam' reference was very good, because... trof Nov 2012 #7

meow2u3

(24,761 posts)

1. Either that, or a hot poker

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:18 PM

Nov 2012

OUCH!

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)

2. A big plug of Trump? nt

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:18 PM

Nov 2012

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)

3. Along with Mitt's head.

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:21 PM

Nov 2012

louslobbs

(3,232 posts)

4. A hornets nest?

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:35 PM

Nov 2012

Lou

lpbk2713

(42,757 posts)

5. Rove's noggin.

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:37 PM

Nov 2012

underpants

(182,796 posts)

6. oooooo I was going to answer "their own head"

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:43 PM

Nov 2012

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)

8. The medical term is cranio-rectal impaction,

Reply to underpants (Reply #6)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:53 PM

Nov 2012

IIRC.

trof

(54,256 posts)

7. I thought the 'proctology exam' reference was very good, because...

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Thu Nov 15, 2012, 06:47 PM

Nov 2012

the rectum appears to be the source of 'facts' that the repugs put out.
At last someone comes clean about pulling stuff out of their asses.

Reply to this discussion