Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pepperbear

(5,648 posts)
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:03 AM Nov 2012

don't look now, but Patraeus just got interesting, and in a good way, if I read correctly

Motives Questioned in F.B.I. Inquiry of Petraeus E-Mails

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/us/timeline-shows-fbi-discovered-petraeus-affair-in-summer.html?_r=0


*snip*

Later, the agent became convinced — incorrectly, officials say — that the case had stalled. Because of his “worldview,” as the official put it, he suspected a politically motivated cover-up to protect President Obama. The agent alerted Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, who called the F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, on Oct. 31 to tell him of the agent’s concerns.

The official said the agent’s self-described “whistle-blowing” was “a little embarrassing” but had no effect on the investigation.

David H. Laufman, who served as a federal prosecutor in national security cases from 2003 to 2007, said, “there’s a lot of chatter and noise about cybercrimes,” and most of it does not lead to an investigation. But he added, “It’s plausible to me that if Ms. Kelley indicated that the stalking was related to her friendship with the C.I.A. director, that would have elevated it as a priority for the bureau.”

Orin S. Kerr, a George Washington University law professor who specializes in computer crime issues, said it was “surprising that they would devote the resources” to investigating who was behind a half-dozen harassing e-mails.

*snip*

uhm...looks like someone really may have been trying to create an october surprise.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
don't look now, but Patraeus just got interesting, and in a good way, if I read correctly (Original Post) pepperbear Nov 2012 OP
yep....here we go grasswire Nov 2012 #1
So the repugs thought they had something demhottie Nov 2012 #3
Yep. Can't say I'm not thrilled that the agent with his "worldview" demhottie Nov 2012 #2
Meh, he had no effect on the investigation SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2012 #4
K&R Thanks for sharing. It adds some clarity to this very murky business Turborama Nov 2012 #5
Yes. Now it's beginning to make sense. Except.... Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #6
Was this a cover your Wellstone ruled Nov 2012 #7
Petraus's downfall knocks him out of 2016 tibbiit Nov 2012 #8
Exactly. It might be Kkkarl behind all of this. loudsue Nov 2012 #9
+1! uponit7771 Nov 2012 #10
Maybe Cantor read 538 and thought this would damage a re-elected Prez? Pure speculation. nt s-cubed Nov 2012 #11

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
1. yep....here we go
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:07 AM
Nov 2012

On O'Donnell just a few minutes ago, they referenced this story, talking about the political motivation of the "rogue" FBI agent who was worried that the WH was getting away with Benghazi coverup.

demhottie

(292 posts)
2. Yep. Can't say I'm not thrilled that the agent with his "worldview"
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:10 AM
Nov 2012


Wound up making a big mess of everything

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
4. Meh, he had no effect on the investigation
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:12 AM
Nov 2012

It was ongoing long before he even contacted Reichert to complain that nothing was being done.

Turborama

(22,109 posts)
5. K&R Thanks for sharing. It adds some clarity to this very murky business
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:13 AM
Nov 2012

...which has had my head spinning.

It's all so complicated and confusing I'd stopped bothering trying to work out what the hell's going on. This news makes it all a lot clearer.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
6. Yes. Now it's beginning to make sense. Except....
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:16 AM
Nov 2012

Cantor had an opportunity to create a scandal BEFORE the election, but did not.

Everything was kept quiet until after the election.

Petraeus, after all, is a big Republican hero. I'm assuming Broadwell is a Republican, and I'm sure Kelly must be, since she's pals with the Petraeus family.

So it's Obama's administration, and his appointment of Petraeus. But it's Republicans who are involved in the scandal.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
7. Was this a cover your
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 12:56 AM
Nov 2012

ass created by the Willard Campaign? Was Paula or Dave offered a plum job in Willard's Kingdom?

loudsue

(14,087 posts)
9. Exactly. It might be Kkkarl behind all of this.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 02:47 AM
Nov 2012

Making sure Jeb gets on the ticket.

We need to start NOW making sure Jeb bush is NOT elected.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»don't look now, but Patra...