Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:52 PM Nov 2012

OK - so when are we going to get rid of mascots that riddicule Native Amercians???

This has been going on too long. Stanford did it, other schools did it.

And in many cases, all it needs is a single letter change:

For example: The Atlanta Braves becomes The Atlanta Brave (the adjective)

Cleveland Indians become Cleveland Indies

Chicago Blackhawks become the Chicago Black Hawks (the bird)

It really shouldn't be that hard

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OK - so when are we going to get rid of mascots that riddicule Native Amercians??? (Original Post) Taverner Nov 2012 OP
People in DC will go apeshit. Flaxbee Nov 2012 #1
Well yeah - otherwise they'll have a record like the Houston Passenger Pigeons Taverner Nov 2012 #2
Several years ago Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #3
We love... LP2K12 Nov 2012 #36
Exactly! Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #39
as 2 parts American Indian (Cherokee and Creek) it doesn't bother me. You see it as ridicule, I see Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #4
The Cleveland Indians logo isn't riddicule? Taverner Nov 2012 #8
so many really horrible things going on in this world - I just can not work up the energy to be Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #11
I agree that in the grand scheme of things Maslow's heirarchy has to be the guide Taverner Nov 2012 #16
tangent, dude. Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #20
Agreed 10x over. Marinedem Nov 2012 #25
It's their name - and most Native Americans don't like it Taverner Nov 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2012 #28
As much as this ridicules cowboys snooper2 Nov 2012 #37
Bingo AlexSatan Nov 2012 #30
Over 40 years ago, I graduated high school on an Indian Reservation where team name and logo PufPuf23 Nov 2012 #5
Go, Ducks!! Blue_In_AK Nov 2012 #9
UC Santa Cruz are the Banana Slugs but alas are not high in NCAA stature. nt PufPuf23 Nov 2012 #18
just curious... Polldancer2012 Nov 2012 #6
Uh yeah... Tree-Hugger Nov 2012 #38
When we TAKE THE PROFIT OUT of it lastlib Nov 2012 #7
The Cleveland Indians will never change. hifiguy Nov 2012 #10
Is this a subject regarding which the tribes have actually taken issue. ? dipsydoodle Nov 2012 #12
The Seminoles have taken issue- BlueMan Votes Nov 2012 #35
Lest anyone try to pick on the Kansas City Chiefs.... lastlib Nov 2012 #13
I think you need to look up the word "ridicule" because it clearly doesn't mean what you think Spider Jerusalem Nov 2012 #14
Ferocity...mmmmkay Taverner Nov 2012 #17
Reading comprehension, fail Spider Jerusalem Nov 2012 #21
The "intention" of the name is embodied in the racist caricature. That's why the owners Romulox Nov 2012 #42
It is a racist practice and should be changed liberal_at_heart Nov 2012 #15
Don't even try to tell me TampaKeeper Nov 2012 #19
Because the Cleveland Original Peoples just doesn't have the same ring to it. nt sylvi Nov 2012 #22
How about Cleveland Indies? Taverner Nov 2012 #27
The man who founded the Chicago Blackhawks... GoCubsGo Nov 2012 #23
STATEMENT OF U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS ON THE USE OF NATIVE AMERICAN IMAGES AND NICKNAMES kwassa Nov 2012 #24
By chance I watched the History Channels show "the Men who built America". bluestate10 Nov 2012 #29
So, instead, you want to ridicule AlexSatan Nov 2012 #31
When we get rid of the team that ridicules Scandinavians! whistler162 Nov 2012 #32
How exactly does the Chicago Blackhawks "ridicule" native americans? BlueMan Votes Nov 2012 #33
"Ridicules'? Yeah, right. B2G Nov 2012 #34
It is largely racist, imo. Especially Cleveland Indians and Washington Redskins. Romulox Nov 2012 #40
do you feel naming military helos is also ridiculing or something different. loli phabay Nov 2012 #41

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
3. Several years ago
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:03 PM
Nov 2012

people wanted Florida State University to change their nickname from "The Seminoles" but the Seminole tribe stepped in to say they have absolutely no problem with it.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
4. as 2 parts American Indian (Cherokee and Creek) it doesn't bother me. You see it as ridicule, I see
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:04 PM
Nov 2012

it as honoring.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
11. so many really horrible things going on in this world - I just can not work up the energy to be
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:17 PM
Nov 2012

outraged over this.

Go work in the Soup Kitchen.

Go help build a house for Habitat for Humanity.

Go visit a Veteran today of all days.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
16. I agree that in the grand scheme of things Maslow's heirarchy has to be the guide
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:07 PM
Nov 2012

But you have to admit that racist caricatures don't exactly make the targets feel welcome - and certainly sends out the message that they don't belong.


Minorities didn't choose to be minorities. A good deal of veterans did.


 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
26. It's their name - and most Native Americans don't like it
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 09:30 PM
Nov 2012

You can go ahead and nit pick all you want, but words and images do, in fact, mean things

Response to Taverner (Reply #26)

PufPuf23

(8,902 posts)
5. Over 40 years ago, I graduated high school on an Indian Reservation where team name and logo
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:04 PM
Nov 2012

were based upon Indian Warriors.

The logo and name is still the same.

On the other hand, "Black Sambo-style" Indian themes have pissed me off for at least the same period.

If Celtics are acceptable, so are Warriors and otherwise much ado about nothing ...

EXCEPT how presented (the Indian as a cartoon figure, the drunk Irishman).

Perhaps we should name sports teams after extinct cultures and animals only (Spartans, Condors(nearly and essentially so), DoDo's etc.)

There is much to be proud about in the Indian heritage. Its all in the presentation.

 

Polldancer2012

(88 posts)
6. just curious...
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:06 PM
Nov 2012

Do the Dallas Cowboys ridicule ranch working cattle farm employees?

Do the Seattle Seahawks ridicule the aforementioned bird?

Do the Philadelphia Eagles ridicule their bird?

Maybe the Atlanta Braves have a NA as a mascot because they were badass fighters? I don't see ridicule.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
10. The Cleveland Indians will never change.
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:17 PM
Nov 2012

Nor should they. The nickname was adopted after Lewis Sockalexis, a Native American who played for the team, was killed by being struck in the head by a pitch. The team was literally renamed in his honor.

Redskins is a different issue entirely

lastlib

(23,482 posts)
13. Lest anyone try to pick on the Kansas City Chiefs....
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:22 PM
Nov 2012

...let me clarify their story: They were named the "Chiefs" in honor of H. Roe Bartle, whose nickname was "Chief", when the team moved from Dallas to Kansas City. Bartle was mayor of KC when that move took place. In the early 1920's Bartle lived on the Wind River Reservation, studying the customs and traditions of the Arapaho tribe there. He became a "blood brother" to the Arapaho Chief's son, and was given the name of Lone Bear by that tribe. He came to Kansas City, and became Chief of the Tribe of Mic-O-Say, an organization to promote native American ways among youth. So the team nickname is not to mock the Native Americans, but to recognize an individual who promoted and respected the Native American culture.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
14. I think you need to look up the word "ridicule" because it clearly doesn't mean what you think
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:28 PM
Nov 2012

Why do so many American sports teams have names that have some Native American reference? "Ridicule" is not the answer; it's more I think the historical association of Native Americans with qualities of ferocity, nobility, aggression, etc. (cf Vikings and Celtics.) Calling the team the Cleveland Indians is not really the same thing as having a mascot like Chief Wahoo (which is in fact a racist caricature).

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
21. Reading comprehension, fail
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 09:02 PM
Nov 2012

I specifically pointed out the Cleveland Indians *mascot* as a racist caricature; the team name itself? isn't.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
42. The "intention" of the name is embodied in the racist caricature. That's why the owners
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 02:02 PM
Nov 2012

commissioned the racist caricature as the mascot of their team.

It wasn't all some horrible coincidence--the name and the caricature are meant to be reinforcing.

TampaKeeper

(48 posts)
19. Don't even try to tell me
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 07:25 PM
Nov 2012

that the Washington redskins and their mocking "tomahawk chop" are supposed to somehow honor the Native American.

GoCubsGo

(32,120 posts)
23. The man who founded the Chicago Blackhawks...
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 09:10 PM
Nov 2012

...named them after Chief Blackhawk because he admired Chief Blackhawk, not because he wanted to ridicule him or other Native Americans. And, BTW, their "mascot" that walks around in a costume IS a black hawk.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
24. STATEMENT OF U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS ON THE USE OF NATIVE AMERICAN IMAGES AND NICKNAMES
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 09:12 PM
Nov 2012
http://www.usccr.gov/press/archives/2001/041601st.htm

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights calls for an end to the use of Native American images and team names by non-Native schools. The Commission deeply respects the rights of all Americans to freedom of expression under the First Amendment and in no way would attempt to prescribe how people can express themselves. However, the Commission believes that the use of Native American images and nicknames in school is insensitive and should be avoided. In addition, some Native American and civil rights advocates maintain that these mascots may violate anti-discrimination laws. These references, whether mascots and their performances, logos, or names, are disrespectful and offensive to American Indians and others who are offended by such stereotyping. They are particularly inappropriate and insensitive in light of the long history of forced assimilation that American Indian people have endured in this country.

Since the civil rights movement of the 1960s many overtly derogatory symbols and images offensive to African-Americans have been eliminated. However, many secondary schools, post-secondary institutions, and a number of professional sports teams continue to use Native American nicknames and imagery. Since the 1970s, American Indian leaders and organizations have vigorously voiced their opposition to these mascots and team names because they mock and trivialize Native American religion and culture.

It is particularly disturbing that Native American references are still to be found in educational institutions, whether elementary, secondary or post-secondary. Schools are places where diverse groups of people come together to learn not only the "Three Rs," but also how to interact respectfully with people from different cultures. The use of stereotypical images of Native Americans by educational institutions has the potential to create a racially hostile educational environment that may be intimidating to Indian students. American Indians have the lowest high school graduation rates in the nation and even lower college attendance and graduation rates. The perpetuation of harmful stereotypes may exacerbate these problems.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
29. By chance I watched the History Channels show "the Men who built America".
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 10:09 PM
Nov 2012

JP Morgan, Nelson Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, the three richest people in the world tried that shit during the first race between William Jennings Bryan and William McKinley. The put out the lie that if Bryan, who was a potential trust buster won, businesses would shut down. They won and became richer as workers became poorer. They did it a second time but manipulated Teddy Roosevelt into the VP spot. McKinley was assassinated and Ted Roosevelt took over and busted the shit out of the massive trusts, launching america on a course of unparalleled wealth.

 

AlexSatan

(535 posts)
31. So, instead, you want to ridicule
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 12:52 PM
Nov 2012

Brave people and Independents.

And that is better, how?

As others have pointed out, the names are meant to honor. Why would you name yourself after something you want to mock?

You see names such as tigers, bears, eagles. Why not slugs, mushrooms, or douchebags? Because people want to be associated with the fierce and strong.

 

BlueMan Votes

(903 posts)
33. How exactly does the Chicago Blackhawks "ridicule" native americans?
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 01:37 PM
Nov 2012

and how do you feel about the Florida State University Seminoles?

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
34. "Ridicules'? Yeah, right.
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 01:38 PM
Nov 2012

Because these teams are intent at invoking laughter at themselves.

This particular argument totally confuses me. They name themselves after warriors who fought with nobility...and that's a bad thing. Stupid PC crap.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
40. It is largely racist, imo. Especially Cleveland Indians and Washington Redskins.
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 01:57 PM
Nov 2012

Fans of both teams should demand better.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OK - so when are we going...