Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:39 PM Nov 2012

Any truth to this?? National Guard on Long Beach Island told "shoot to kill"

looters. This is LBI, NJ. My Republican mother thought this was the greatest thing she has heard. Property is more important than lives, you know.

I am sick if this is true.

84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Any truth to this?? National Guard on Long Beach Island told "shoot to kill" (Original Post) adigal Nov 2012 OP
Not just no but HELL no. There is no LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #1
How do you know?? My mother heard this from a woman in Brant Beach, on LBI adigal Nov 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author WhollyHeretic Nov 2012 #3
you can tell Enrique Nov 2012 #4
I know because I am 3rd generation Army LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #7
Thank you for your response - I feel better that it is a rumor n/t adigal Nov 2012 #16
Not true. (An older DU thread on this subject) Mika Nov 2012 #32
That's awful! LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #36
NEW evidence???? Hell, we knew that when it happened. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #46
Reading some of the letters to the editor back then, Art_from_Ark Nov 2012 #55
That's not a very good source treestar Nov 2012 #53
This is true. What bothered me was how gleeful they all were about it. Nt adigal Nov 2012 #70
I'd second this hell no Dorian Gray Nov 2012 #74
None. Robb Nov 2012 #5
They would first have to be issued weapons nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #6
The ones on TV had weapons... jenw2 Nov 2012 #20
Thank you - our good liberal friends think I am nuts adigal Nov 2012 #23
Those were cops, iirc two of them are now serving long jail terms nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #28
That wasn't National Guard glacierbay Nov 2012 #61
Those would be military police nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #26
Nonsense. Part of relief duty is security, and those Guard soldiers are armed. Robb Nov 2012 #27
You are incorrect tkmorris Nov 2012 #49
Property owners aren't allowed there. HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #8
That would be an illegal order, if I am familiar with the military enough. TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #9
Smells like reactionary bullshit to me. MineralMan Nov 2012 #10
Gospel truth, of course. MineralMan Nov 2012 #11
You can mock me, but this was from two people who live on LBI adigal Nov 2012 #15
I'm not mocking you. MineralMan Nov 2012 #21
I hope so...but they did this after Katrina adigal Nov 2012 #24
The National Guard did that? Really? MineralMan Nov 2012 #29
OK, I was mistaken. Thank you for correcting me on that. adigal Nov 2012 #33
Actually, the correct response is to do a little more checking MineralMan Nov 2012 #40
Thank you for your suggestion n/t adigal Nov 2012 #43
A few rogue cops, not soldiers LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #30
Yup. Here's a link to the actual story: MineralMan Nov 2012 #34
Wonderful!! So it wasn't National Guard, just cops adigal Nov 2012 #44
Oh, for pete's sake. MineralMan Nov 2012 #50
I said I was wrong about New Orleans, and you don't KNOW if this info adigal Nov 2012 #52
I know what the National Guard does and doesn't do. MineralMan Nov 2012 #56
They most certainly did not do this after Katrina glacierbay Nov 2012 #62
It's bullshit. When was Martial Law declared? Ikonoklast Nov 2012 #12
OK, so maybe a rumor?? Because this woman said there are looters there adigal Nov 2012 #13
No, they are keeping out due to broken gas mains nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #25
yep. it's not a good thing to say. didn't stop YOU. cali Nov 2012 #39
You heard "here and there?" MineralMan Nov 2012 #47
this post is shameful. cali Nov 2012 #14
I agree. The poster should self delete or be alerted on LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #17
So alert on me - did this happen in Katrina or not?? adigal Nov 2012 #19
It did not happen in Katrina. Schema Thing Nov 2012 #31
It did not. Go to the link below: MineralMan Nov 2012 #37
You were wrong. Show some dignity and self-delete your incorrect MineralMan Nov 2012 #48
So why did you click on it?? I was told this by people living there adigal Nov 2012 #18
Can you possibly be this clueless? cali Nov 2012 #22
Thanks, honey. Your intelligent, mannerly rejoinder will certainly convince me adigal Nov 2012 #38
you didn't question shit, sweetie cali Nov 2012 #42
Don't be such a sensitive wimpy baby adigal Nov 2012 #51
A valid question? hoboken123 Nov 2012 #59
No, your false equivalence is not valid. Thanks anyway. adigal Nov 2012 #67
That's abso-fucking-lutely the same goddam thing. Iggo Nov 2012 #72
Huh? I can't decipher what you mean. Could you speak properly? adigal Nov 2012 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author Iggo Nov 2012 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author Iggo Nov 2012 #79
Oh wow. Iggo Nov 2012 #80
just lock this hysterical crap, please! shoot to kill only was under GOPers in Katrina, not Obama. Divine Discontent Nov 2012 #81
Is there any other kind of shooting? Kurska Nov 2012 #35
That's true, we are all trained to shoot center mass LiberalLoner Nov 2012 #41
Sounds like the end result of a game of Republican Telephone: petronius Nov 2012 #45
My sister is staying with a guy who is on a SWAT team in southern NJ adigal Nov 2012 #54
Of course, HE IS CIVILIAN POLICE nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #57
Ok, believe what you will. Aren't you the clever snarky one? N/t adigal Nov 2012 #66
That SWAT is part of a civilian police department? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #76
Where in South Jersey, Camden? a la izquierda Nov 2012 #58
LBI. The SWAT is from the mainland, where my sister is staying adigal Nov 2012 #68
Well, that makes more sense. a la izquierda Nov 2012 #83
SWAT teams are NOT part of the National Guard. MineralMan Nov 2012 #60
Shoot if need be. glacierbay Nov 2012 #64
You were so polite and calm. DevonRex Nov 2012 #78
yeah, sure. like anyone believes a word YOU write. cali Nov 2012 #82
This notion has been debunked over and over again in this thread. Chorophyll Nov 2012 #63
I did a google search and couldn't find anything except for quinnox Nov 2012 #65
Not true Marrah_G Nov 2012 #69
hope not longbow5 Nov 2012 #71
No way. Soldiers and Guardspeople are NEVER instructed to shoot to kill civilians. slackmaster Nov 2012 #73
This message was self-deleted by its author myrna minx Nov 2012 #84
 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
2. How do you know?? My mother heard this from a woman in Brant Beach, on LBI
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:43 PM
Nov 2012

who heard it from the police, she said.

Response to adigal (Reply #2)

LiberalLoner

(9,761 posts)
7. I know because I am 3rd generation Army
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:47 PM
Nov 2012

(Out now) and DH is still on active duty as a Colonel. That is not how the military operates in the US. Kent state was NOT intentional on the part of the leaders.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
46. NEW evidence???? Hell, we knew that when it happened.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:17 PM
Nov 2012

I remember it well. Lots of coverage at the time, lots of film.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
55. Reading some of the letters to the editor back then,
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 07:48 PM
Nov 2012

it really shocked me to read that there were actually assholes who SUPPORTED the killing of unarmed students!

 

jenw2

(374 posts)
20. The ones on TV had weapons...
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:57 PM
Nov 2012

just like they did after Katrina. The CONservatives are never going to let a good crisis go to waste and not execute their fantasy of a totalitarian state for as long as they can.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
23. Thank you - our good liberal friends think I am nuts
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:58 PM
Nov 2012

and are going to "alert" on me, ooooohhhhhhhh, I am scared.

In Katrina, they kept people from crossing the bridge to safety. Of course, they were minority people.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
27. Nonsense. Part of relief duty is security, and those Guard soldiers are armed.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:01 PM
Nov 2012

Pistols holstered, rifles slung -- but armed.

Edited to add: To be clear, if someone's stealing stuff, these men and women will quickly arrest them. That's their job, not "shoot to kill" or some other silliness.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
8. Property owners aren't allowed there.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:47 PM
Nov 2012

Friend of mine has a house in Brigantine. He's not allowed there until this weekend. Responders are checking for casalties, downed ppwer lines, gas leaks, and to prevent looting.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
9. That would be an illegal order, if I am familiar with the military enough.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:48 PM
Nov 2012

This isn't a combat zone, no matter how much shit looters steal. I think it's a rumor intended to scare looters.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
11. Gospel truth, of course.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:50 PM
Nov 2012

I heard that Obama planned the hurricane, too, and that he used the beyond top secret weather machine to make it happen so he'd win the election. Probably the same source for both stories...

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
21. I'm not mocking you.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:57 PM
Nov 2012

I'm mocking the people who said that, based on no information at all. The National Guard on disaster duty is not going to shoot anyone. It simply ain't happening. The people you heard that from are badly misinformed.

They are very much incorrect.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
29. The National Guard did that? Really?
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:02 PM
Nov 2012

I believe your memory is failing. Go look it up. Google has the right answers, even if your memory has the wrong ones. Then go look up the prosecutions over that action.

You're simply wrong. The people who sad that to someone who told you they said that are wrong.

Spreading stupid rumors at this time is a very bad idea.


Here's a link: No National Guard involved. Just racist local cops. They're in prison now. Go read it and learn:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danziger_Bridge_shootings

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
33. OK, I was mistaken. Thank you for correcting me on that.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:06 PM
Nov 2012

But the question needed to be asked. Sorry if it discomfited people.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
40. Actually, the correct response is to do a little more checking
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:09 PM
Nov 2012

before you post rumors and nonsense. And then, when people called you on it, you made additional claims that were not true. You've said more that one thing in this thread that is simply incorrect. A little Googling would have prevented that.

You can still self-delete your original post. I suggest you do that now.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
44. Wonderful!! So it wasn't National Guard, just cops
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:14 PM
Nov 2012

I feel so much better now about our great democracy!! Not really.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
50. Oh, for pete's sake.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:27 PM
Nov 2012

First you repeated some nonsense your mother told you she heard from "someone." Then, you accused the National Guard of shooting people crossing a bridge in New Orleans. Wrong on both counts. Now, you're pretending you didn't say that and snarking at me for pointing out your grievous error.

You were wrong. Period.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
52. I said I was wrong about New Orleans, and you don't KNOW if this info
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 05:40 PM
Nov 2012

I received is wrong or not, do you? You have no knowledge whatsoever, so why don't you care that it might be true?

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
62. They most certainly did not do this after Katrina
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:30 PM
Nov 2012

that was the NOPD, and those cops involved were tried and convicted.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
13. OK, so maybe a rumor?? Because this woman said there are looters there
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:52 PM
Nov 2012

and that was their instructions. Maybe it is a rumor to scare any more looters, but it is not a good thing to say. What if someone is going through someone else's house, looking for cans of tuna fish, or something. Do you think if they were shot, we would ever hear about it.

Personally, I know we are not getting the whole story out of these Jersey towns. I have heard here and there of lots of fatalities. Same thing with Staten Island. My brother-in-laws two friends were just found in their basement yesterday, dead. An off-duty cop, dead. We don't need deaths from trigger happy Guardsmen. (And I know 99% of the Guards are not trigger happy. This is not meant to criticize the sane ones.)

How long did it take to get the death toll out of Katrina? Months, right? Maybe that is another reason they are trying to keep people off the island.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
25. No, they are keeping out due to broken gas mains
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:59 PM
Nov 2012

And downed, still possibly energized, power lines...and unsafe structures...

We media can enter places like this, with media cards, at strictly our own risk. Serious, it does not help.

We will also have a pretty good hande in people killed within 72 hours.

What is nota rumor is that they have likely alerted MORT teams, part of FEMA, since local coroners are having a few issues.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
39. yep. it's not a good thing to say. didn't stop YOU.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:08 PM
Nov 2012

just stop with the dog shit rumor that the NG is under orders to shoot people.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
47. You heard "here and there?"
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:20 PM
Nov 2012

So you rush here to repeat the rumors? Please don't do that. Instead, wait, search Google for actual news, and then post. Jumping the gun with rumors doesn't do anyone any good, and stirs up misunderstandings. In this instance, you went further and blamed National Guard troops for murdering people. You were very much incorrect, which a single Google search proved.

Don't you understand that rumors cause problems. You're not there. You did not hear anything from any reliable source. Why post rumors on DU, and make responsible people go looking for facts? It just doesn't make any sense.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
19. So alert on me - did this happen in Katrina or not??
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:57 PM
Nov 2012

Don't lie to yourself, just because you are in the military.

I have been here a LOONNNGGGG time and I am NOT a conspiracy kook.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
48. You were wrong. Show some dignity and self-delete your incorrect
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:23 PM
Nov 2012

posts. Don't make others work to correct your flawed information. You were wrong. Period. Why not admit it, apologize, and delete the posts where you said incorrect things that stain the reputation of National Guard members?


Feh!

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
18. So why did you click on it?? I was told this by people living there
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:55 PM
Nov 2012

If something like this is true, we need to know this. It happened in Katrina, people were prevented from coming over the bridge to safety, so don't BS me that this cannot happen in America.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
22. Can you possibly be this clueless?
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 02:58 PM
Nov 2012

You're spreading a fucking idiot rumor with NO link to anything factual at a time of crisis. It's a shit thing to do. And guess what, honey? I never said that this couldn't happen in America. duh.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
38. Thanks, honey. Your intelligent, mannerly rejoinder will certainly convince me
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:07 PM
Nov 2012

of the rightness of your thinking.

And I am NOT clueless. You berated me for questioning, and then said that you never said it couldn't happen in America. How do you hold both of those thoughts in your brain at once?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
42. you didn't question shit, sweetie
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:11 PM
Nov 2012

you're spreading a rumor. a question mark doesn't change that, darlin'. and your insistence that this is happening in your responses in this thread, demonstrate something quite ugly.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
51. Don't be such a sensitive wimpy baby
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 05:37 PM
Nov 2012

I asked a valid question. 99% of whatis,posted here has less validity than what I asked. And I asked, I didn't tell. Please try to understand the difference. Gosh, it's not that hard. Really.

hoboken123

(251 posts)
59. A valid question?
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:18 PM
Nov 2012

I hear they've started eating bodies floating near Mantaloking. Anyone else hear that?

There: I too have asked a valid question.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
67. No, your false equivalence is not valid. Thanks anyway.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:59 PM
Nov 2012

One is possible, the other is absurd. Bad logic.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
75. Huh? I can't decipher what you mean. Could you speak properly?
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 10:43 PM
Nov 2012

Thanks. English would be nice.

Response to adigal (Reply #75)

Response to adigal (Reply #75)

petronius

(26,602 posts)
45. Sounds like the end result of a game of Republican Telephone:
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 03:14 PM
Nov 2012

RWer #1: "Those fucking looters (you know who I mean) should be shot!"

RWer #2: "Wouldn't it be great if the NG was ordered to shoot looters!?"

RWer #3: "...the NG was ordered to shoot looters!"

RWers #4-50: "Yay, shoot looters ('those' people, natch)!"

RWer #51: That Kenyan Marxist caused to hurricane so that the NG could shoot homeowners to protect looters!"

RWers #52- "Oh noes!!!1"

(OK, maybe not the last part... )

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
54. My sister is staying with a guy who is on a SWAT team in southern NJ
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 07:34 PM
Nov 2012

And he is patrolling with automatic weapons, rifles and bullet proof vests. He was told shoot if need be.

Thank you. I am done with the naysayers. Believe what you will.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
57. Of course, HE IS CIVILIAN POLICE
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 07:52 PM
Nov 2012

that is a given. Can you distinguish between your local CIVILIAN POLICE and the Guard, let alone Federal troops?

I guess you can't.

If he was not, I would be shocked.

Oh and here is a huge clue to you, POLICE go into the field wearing Level III-A at least Body armor every day, disaster or no disaster. And of coures with their side arms... and SWAT carries with them their whatever automatic rifle (they got permission for those, MP-5 are favorites), or their service side arm.

Is he also carrying a radio, cuffs, and pepper spray? SHOCKING!

a la izquierda

(11,794 posts)
58. Where in South Jersey, Camden?
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:04 PM
Nov 2012

They're probably not many people left on LBI. Most police forces are skeleton crews during the winter in beach towns in NJ, so unless this guy is with the State Police, I doubt LBI has a SWAT. But I do know that my uncle told me that neither he, nor anyone else can get on the island until further notice. And he's got a business and a house there.

 

adigal

(7,581 posts)
68. LBI. The SWAT is from the mainland, where my sister is staying
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:01 PM
Nov 2012

She and her husband, and my brother can't get to their houses either. I hope all is ok with your uncle's places.

a la izquierda

(11,794 posts)
83. Well, that makes more sense.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 07:16 AM
Nov 2012

My uncle doesn't worry too much about his material possessions. He cleaned out his closets and pantry at his main house and brought everything to the shelter nearby. He always taught me that there are people much worse off than I will ever be, and generosity is the sign of a good human being. I guess this is why he's a liberal even though he is very wealthy.

Fwiw, I am sure the shoot on sight order is just a rumor.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
60. SWAT teams are NOT part of the National Guard.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:22 PM
Nov 2012

Again, this is a third hand account and a rumor. Can you not at least recognize that you are spreading false information? You have not posted a single, confirmable piece of information in this thread, and have gotten the story about Katrina and the people shot on the bridge completely wrong. Why should anyone pay any attention to any post you make? Your information is third hand, at best, and completely incorrect, at worst, and you continue to post more of it. Why are you posting incorrect information and rumors on DU? Please be more careful, and check your sources more carefully. There is the potential to do much harm by posting inaccurate, misleading information on DU.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
64. Shoot if need be.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:47 PM
Nov 2012

They won't shoot unless they're lives are threatened, like someone coming at them with a weapon, they're not going to shoot just because of looting.
I'm a cop and I know how these things work.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
78. You were so polite and calm.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 02:14 AM
Nov 2012

I'm cracking up laughing, thinking, like, really??? They can shoot if they need to?? With, like, real bullets even? They don't just have to be targets for the bad guys to shoot at this time?? Yay!!

Probably good that you answered her. But one more silly post like that last one she made and I may not be able to restrain myself.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
82. yeah, sure. like anyone believes a word YOU write.
Fri Nov 2, 2012, 04:21 AM
Nov 2012

You're determined to stir up hysterical bullshit. It's repulsive.

Chorophyll

(5,179 posts)
63. This notion has been debunked over and over again in this thread.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:34 PM
Nov 2012

Maybe it's time to take the thread down? Seriously, the last thing people dealing with the aftermath need right now is anti-government bullshit. (Which is what this is.)

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
65. I did a google search and couldn't find anything except for
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 08:57 PM
Nov 2012

the fact that the national guard is there on site distributing food and water. I would be surprised if they were given an order like this. But if any one is shot and killed, I'm sure we will hear about it in the news.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
73. No way. Soldiers and Guardspeople are NEVER instructed to shoot to kill civilians.
Thu Nov 1, 2012, 09:42 PM
Nov 2012

They are allowed to defend themselves if they are attacked, but they are to use lethal force only if there is no alternative.

Response to adigal (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Any truth to this?? Natio...