Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMan's neighbors banned together to buy high-tech surveillance cameras to catch him in the act
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/miamis-neighbor-hell-caught-tape-arrested-17532805Miami 'Neighbor From Hell' Caught on Tape, Arrested
Man's neighbors banned together to buy high-tech surveillance cameras to catch him in the act.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
17 replies, 2914 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Man's neighbors banned together to buy high-tech surveillance cameras to catch him in the act (Original Post)
Liberal_in_LA
Oct 2012
OP
The funny part is, that's direct from the ABCNEWS link. They used the phrase "banned together". nt
Electric Monk
Oct 2012
#8
Uh, I hate to break it to you, but it's "moot" point, not "mute" point. nt :)
Speck Tater
Oct 2012
#14
In fairness to the OP, that's the way it was presented on the ABC website. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Oct 2012
#10
Sugarcoated
(7,736 posts)1. Love it when bullies get theirs
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)2. I'm glad he isn't my neighbor
I wouldn't want an angry person like that near my children.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)3. He's got major issues, doesn't he?
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)4. "band" (present tense) or "banded" (past tense), but not "banned"
which is the past tense of "ban".
Just saying.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)8. The funny part is, that's direct from the ABCNEWS link. They used the phrase "banned together". nt
lpbk2713
(42,770 posts)11. That's a mute point because they are such loosers.
This is hugh.
BWAHAHAHA
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)14. Uh, I hate to break it to you, but it's "moot" point, not "mute" point. nt :)
zappaman
(20,606 posts)15. WHOOOSH!!!! n/t
We are witnessing the death of irony.
patrice
(47,992 posts)12. The "cream" rises until it sours. nt
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)17. That is kind of a HUGH spelling era on they're part.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)10. In fairness to the OP, that's the way it was presented on the ABC website. n/t
sgsmith
(398 posts)5. Banned?
Damn, but nobody seems to use the right word anymore.
Banded.
Marr
(20,317 posts)6. What a fucking nut.
Kadie
(15,369 posts)7. Wow.
What a terrible neighbor!
Response to Liberal_in_LA (Original post)
yesphan This message was self-deleted by its author.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)13. "Banded" not "banned" unless they did ban something. Spell check fail.