Andrea Greenspan is Such.A.Fucking.Dirtbag

[Stinky The Clown]

That is all

[Flashmann]

1. Just exactly

What are you trying to say??.......

[JoePhilly]

2. Yea, she's very concerned that Obama doesn't do as good a job as Bill Clinton framing

the discussion.

She needs to discuss THAT bit of theater criticism, because the alternative would be to discuss the number ways in which in 45 minutes, Clinton presented more facts accurately then were presented during the entire GOP convention.

[Spazito]

3. Mrs. Greenspan is appalling...

She is inarticulate, hesitant, always searching for something negative to say about the President, the Democrats while citing repub lies as if they are truths. It is the opposite when she has a repub guest, she is comfortable, no hesitation and no criticism of her party, yes her party is clearly the repub party, imo.

Her shilling becomes more and more evident, more desperate as the election nears.

Putting politics aside, I do not feel she has the skills needed to fill the position she has been given, not at all.

[Whisp]

6. you bring up a good point

She is Not Skillful at her work. So the only other reason she is there is because she is a shill. But most of them are. She is just really bad as covering it up.

She stammers and hums and huhs and you can actually see the cogs in her head turn while trying to put together a negative string about Obama or the campaign.

[rfranklin]

4. Stinky, you are in BIG trouble again!

elleng is gonna get you!


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021278074

Small rant: It is Andrea MITCHELL, DUers.

Last edited Wed Sep 5, 2012, 08:46 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

She is a working woman, and has decided to retain her own name. DU, at least, should respect that.

End rant

[Stinky The Clown]

5. I replied to that thread

Using her husband's name to make a point is an act many of us do that is unique to her and her alone, for all the obvious reasons.

[rfranklin]

7. I was teasing...I have no problem with that...

one has to take rhetorical flourishes for what they are.

[glowing]

9. If she used her husband's last name, everyone would know who she was shilling for..

and it could cost her a job... Most people do not know who her husband is. And seeing how his run at the Fed screwed us up nicely, she should retire, respectively, and allow someone with some actual ability to read a teleprompter have a chance..

She's ok with some interviews when she seems to respect them... but she's definitely sided.

[cpwm17]

8. After her disgraceful performance promoting the Iraq War

I've learned to take anything she says with a grain of salt. I knew she was full of BS before the war, and I'm not a trained reporter with connections to the folks on the inside - she sucks.