Sandusky's Lawyer: If you believe witness, dial 1-800-REALITY (and you will reach....

[Are_grits_groceries]

A gay phone sex line!

http://deadsp.in/

You can't make this shite up!
And he makes slime mold look righteous.

[Politicalboi]

1. Isn't he the one who

Also had a sexual abuse charge with a teenage girl? Defense attorneys make me sick for the most part. And I hope these boys get a shit load of money. But it's not about the money, but they deserve to have their well being paid for by this POS Sandusky. I hope more people are charged in this. After the 98 case, his wife should have been concerned he was still hanging around young boys. She an enabler as far as I'm concerned. And what of the parents who let their boys go with this man? Did they know about the abuse cases of his past? Like in the Michele Jackson case, parents do hold some of the blame IMO.

[Are_grits_groceries]

3. Here is the story about Amendola:

Defense attorney Joe Amendola, 63, representing Sandusky in the sexual molestation case roiling Penn State and Joe Paterno’s legendary football program, impregnated a teenager and later married her, The Daily has learned.

According to documents filed with Centre County Courthouse, Amendola served as the attorney for Mary Iavasile’s emancipation petition on Sept. 3, 1996, just weeks before her 17th birthday.

The emancipation request said Mary graduated from high school in two years with a 3.69 grade point average and maintained a full-time job — but makes no mention of any special relationship between her and her lawyer.

Roughly around the same time, however, Iavasile became pregnant with Amendola’s child, and gave birth before she turned 18, her mother, Janet Iavasile, alleged in an interview with The Daily.

He was born in 1948 and was around 49 at the time.
http://www.kfbk.com/pages/johnmcginness.html?article=9400272

Gak!

[nenagh]

2. There is a new comment on the Pennline thread "Another Version of Mike McQueary's story...

about Jerry Sandusky Surfaces"

It was written today at 1:22 pm by a poster: "tesibria"

It is an excellent reply, though graphic.

The poster outlines why he/she thinks the Dranov account is consistent with Mike McQueary's GJ testimony.

I hope that tesibria is correct in the assessment.