General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCondi just told Andrea Greenspan Iraq war was because Saddam was "a threat in the middle East"
Gosh, I thought it was because we had proof that he had WMDs and was going to use them.
Learn something new every day.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)of that shit out there just the other day?
vanlassie
(5,670 posts)Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Pathetic.
Wednesdays
(17,367 posts)spanone
(135,831 posts)unnecessary war
Raster
(20,998 posts)Which of course was a lie.
A threat in the middle east? To who? The international petroleum mafia?
WMDs? Proven to be a lie before we ever invaded. Hell, we know CONCLUSIVELY what he had... we sold most of it to him.
And my favorite lie she just spoke this evening: The only reason the Obama Administration got bin Ladden was because the bush* administration had already done the prep work! Again, a bold-faced lie.
From Think Progress:
And just six months after 9/11, Bush suggested in a press conference that Bin Laden was not a top priority for his administration. Asked whether Bush thought capturing Bin Laden was important, Bush scolded those who cared about Bin Laden for not understand[ing] the scope of the mission because Bin Laden was just one person, whom Bush said, I really just dont spend that much time on:
Who knows if hes hiding in some cave or not. We havent heard from him in a long time. The idea of focusing on one person really indicates to me people dont understand the scope of the mission. Terror is bigger than one person. Hes just a person whos been marginalized. I dont know where he is. I really just dont spend that much time on him, to be honest with you.