|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:52 PM Original message |
If QEII, Charles, William all die while Kate is pregnant with first child who becomes King/Queen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. I know it is entertaining... to ask these questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. Lady Gaga will ascend to the throne and become Queen Gaga. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherish44 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. They've got a blowup "Automatic Monarch" they can use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes. Harry is currently 3rd in line to the throne. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. So what if Kate has and emergency C section to have the bady |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. Now you're simply being grotesque. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
87. And then the evil gangster Stefanos claims it's HIS baby...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Oh man you are going to start a civil war over a technicality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
61. Only because William doesn't have any heirs yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:04 PM Response to Reply #61 |
88. He doesn't have much hair left, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. I think everybody expects he will get some heirs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
76. So that would be this guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
5. Susan Boyle n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. This guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Journeyman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. I believe it would be John Goodman. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raschel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's kinda morbid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shraby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
10. Doesn't really matter. They don't rule England anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. It's a Monty Python world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. No shit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
11. As of now, I am in charge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
44. & Dame Edna is his Queen........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. Her child, with Harry as Prince regent and her as Queen Mother and Dowager Queen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PCIntern (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:27 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. the evil uncle who looks exactly like the groomsman or whoever he was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Oh dear me...like Moses in Phaoroh's court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
29. She wouldn't be queen anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. No. Victoria's mother was not a member of the immediate royal family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Catherine isn't either. Right now she's the wife of a duke and prince |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. So possibly Duchess Regent? Has there ever been one of those? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. One more objection -- wouldn't moment of death determine title in this instance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Good point. Never ran across a time frame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Quite possible she would be a member of a Regency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
94. No, a mother of a King isn't necessarily a Queen herself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
15. I am already the King |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. All hail sire. Forsooth where is thy kingdom, your highness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
20. Simon Powell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marybourg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
21. The Regent. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Regent usually refers to an older relative who reigns in place of a child |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
22. Such an incident would increase sales of the tabloids to the point where they control the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Only if the Queen Mother (Kate) started dating Justin Bieber |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
24. The child with a regency for legal purposes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
67. that & her mother's bat-shit crazy idea to extend the Regency until Vic turned 21 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #67 |
91. That sounds like something Conroy would kite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 07:24 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Yup, I couldn't remember Conroy's name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
27. I believe the child does immediately upon birth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. There is no gap in time after a monarch's death. Whoever is the LIVING HEIR is next. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. not sure, but I'm guessing that the ghost of Al Haig might try to claim it ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Oh that cracked me up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
30. Jeb Bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
31. I might depend on the order of those deaths. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:37 PM Response to Reply #31 |
37. Chuck can't die first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I forgot about Andrew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #37 |
50. William and Harry are higher in line than Andrew, even if Charles dies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wickerwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:47 PM Response to Reply #50 |
62. I'm not up on the modern interpretation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:04 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Andrew would only be next if Charles hadn't had children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. :ahem: Edward before Anne |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:19 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Yep, they still have the boy's first rule |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:50 PM Response to Reply #70 |
98. ... and I just heard from a "royalty" journalist on TV this weekend that Anne works the hardest ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. Does Andrew even HAVE a son? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emmadoggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #37 |
56. Andrew is currently 4th in line, after Harry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
60. Andrew has two daughters..(one with beige antlers) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emmadoggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:28 PM Response to Reply #60 |
100. Ha!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patricia92243 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #37 |
64. Wow - that could be a real possibility. Elizabeth could live 10-15 or more years. It is not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
69. Andrew only gets the nod if both William AND Harry die |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #69 |
75. Edward does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Here is my interpretation of your theory, also born out of complete ignorance of the laws of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. I forgot about Andrew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
34. Harry. The unborn are not heirs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:50 PM Response to Reply #34 |
45. Harry would be the child's heir presumptive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:35 PM Response to Reply #45 |
77. Your source? Not that you have none, but I would like to read this in context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 05:38 PM Response to Reply #77 |
85. Well, not one exactly for an unborn child. That has happen so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:47 PM Response to Reply #34 |
63. I always believed that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #63 |
78. There is no "baby" in the OP; there is a fetus of indeterminate age and sex in the example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
39. I hope it's Harry - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinnie From Indy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
42. Count de Money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. It's good to be the King. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
51. If tradition is followed Harry would probably become regent. However, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
54. They changed the succession rules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Straight to William |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarge43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. When did Parliament change the succession laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:36 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. They haven't, it's still a male preference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #58 |
86. Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #54 |
80. They most certainly did NOT change the Law of Succession! William succeeds Charles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
55. Me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WolverineDG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
66. the baby, when it's born |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geoff R. Casavant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
68. Look back to your history -- it's not pretty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. self delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mysuzuki2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #68 |
95. Stephen and Maud fought a pretty vicious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geoff R. Casavant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 10:44 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. That period isn't called "The Anarchy" for nothing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
73. Optimus Prime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ellipsis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
74. Richard of Gloucester of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
79. Harry will be regent until the kid is old enough to ascend the throne - probably 18? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
81. THE OFFICIAL LINE OF SUCCESSION : |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darth_Kitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 06:05 PM Response to Reply #81 |
89. But that's the Protestant succession, how about the REAL one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
82. Freddy Mercury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
83. this guy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
84. Elton John |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
93. The Anti Christ 666. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyLover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
96. That's easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-11 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
99. Cabbage Patch King |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC