|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Paradoxical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 04:43 AM Original message |
Poll question: Should cigarettes be banned? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 04:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. May I recommend you start a circumcision thread as well? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annata4Peace (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Dont ban cigs. Make nicotine a class 1 substance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reggie the dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. what about simply letting adults use whatever drugs they want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Make one or the other mandatory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
2. A tremendous shortfall in tax revenue would have to be made up elsewhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Besdies, Prohibitions Work When? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
octothorpe (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:08 AM Response to Original message |
4. Would you say cigarettes are made addictive because they serve no practical use to the user? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Banning marijuana or alcohol never meant people couldn/t get them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:17 AM Response to Original message |
6. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:55 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Because consistent stupidity is preferable to inconsistency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #15 |
30. so, let's just ban everything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:58 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. I like you, but I'm not a fan of if/thens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 11:44 AM Response to Reply #16 |
29. that's where I was going |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:25 AM Response to Original message |
7. I am a former smoker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uben (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:39 AM Response to Original message |
8. HELL NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
9. Want the Food Police also? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elias49 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:05 AM Response to Original message |
10. I'd like to see television banned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:17 AM Response to Original message |
11. no. light em if you got em |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:14 AM Response to Original message |
12. People, especially reasonably intelligent people, should know better than to start smoking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
14. Since one is allowed to kill themselves, smoking is allowed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 09:32 AM Response to Reply #14 |
26. I agree with the smoking inside but people should be allowed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
35. Suicide is illegal in most (all) of the US. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueamy66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
17. I voted "other" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow2u3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
18. Criminalizing tobacco possession is downright riduculous and counterproductive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
37. You don't know anyone who would kill or rob for tobacco? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
20. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
21. No, AND all taxes on tobacco products should be eliminated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
23. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
24. Cigarettes are not designed to be recreational? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
25. I assume the advocates of banning cigarettes also favor banning pot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paradoxical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:56 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I actually don't want pot banned. I want most drugs to be legal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
former9thward (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:32 PM Response to Reply #27 |
39. You say you want "most drugs to be legal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
28. Sure why not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
31. Until marijuana is legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
32. Why is it so hard to understand that prohibition doesn't work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
33. No, goverment should regulate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
34. Why would I choose that cigarettes be banned? I am a smoker. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
japple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
36. Hell, yes. Then I would never be tempted to start smoking AGAIN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
38. If you want logical consistency in our laws, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-28-11 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
40. NO, and I never smoked. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC