Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Walmart Paid its 1.4 Million U.S. Workers a Living Wage, it Would Result in Almost No Pain for th

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:44 AM
Original message
If Walmart Paid its 1.4 Million U.S. Workers a Living Wage, it Would Result in Almost No Pain for th
Edited on Fri Apr-22-11 08:44 AM by AlabamaLibrul
A study released this week found that if the nation's largest low-wage employer, Walmart, were to pay its 1.4 million U.S. workers a living wage of at least $12 per hour and pass every single penny of the costs onto consumers, the average Walmart customer would pay just 46 cents more per shopping trip, or around $12 extra dollars each year.

Consider that the next time you hear some corporate mouthpiece warning of massive job losses if some minimally progressive policy were enacted. You never see them arguing on the cable news shows that increasing the minimum wage will hurt Walmart’s or McDonald's bottom lines; it’s always about the jobs that will be destroyed. According to the ubiquitous spin, large corporations, the embodiments of American-style capitalism, are so vulnerable to the meddling of no-nothing bureaucrats that any government intervention into the “free market” drives corporations away to sunnier locales or threatens their very existence. However well intentioned, it all ends up costing workers their jobs.

http://www.alternet.org/economy/150685/if_walmart_paid_its_1.4_million_u.s._workers_a_living_wage%2C_it_would_result_in_almost_no_pain_for_the_average_customer?page=2
---------------------------

It of course dodges the issue of their Asian workers, namely those who produce goods for Walmart, but it's a good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. It probably would help them as more people would have money to spend at Walmart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "These poor and low-income workers could expect to earn an additional $1,670 to $6,500 a year"
A 2004 study by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce estimated that just one Walmart store with 200 “associates” costs taxpayers over $420,000 per year in government assistance to the poor.

"Your twelve dollars per year can take an entire store off public assistance!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. And imagine what millions of workers pumping more of their wages into the economy
(even if only at Wal-Mart with their employee discount) would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, but the Waltons would no longer be able to wipe their asses with solid gold toilet paper.
Liberals ideals are so selfish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This would assume them passing on every single penny of costs to the buyer
Twelve dollars in increased prices over the year. Each person that shops there would be paying one hour for one person per year more, on average.
So everybody that works in an (American) Walmart can get a living wage.
Food for thought on the high cost of low price.

Of course this is nothing new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The Waltons don't wipe their asses with solid gold toilet paper.
They have people to wipe their asses FOR THEM with solid PLATINUM toilet paper.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. They wouldn't pass the cost onto their customers.
They'd pass 100x the cost onto their customers - then blame the the price increase on the laws that required them to pay a living wage.

Divide & conquer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not to mention I might actually set foot in a Wal-Mart again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. that just might do it for me too, but I find myself getting claustrophobic in their stores
even if they are huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R from one of the 1.4 million. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Great article, AlabamaLibrul.
There's a lot more discussed in addition to the wage discussion: where the US ranks in corporate tax collection, benefits of worker safety rules outweighing the 'costs' of implementation, offshoring of jobs a result of conscious crafting of trade agreements, etc.

Good find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. or instead of passing the cost on to the customer they could...
cut dividend payments and reduce executive salries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. Americans don't help each other any more. It's all about....
I have mine. Fuck the rest of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Walmart employees are the biggest demographic on....
...Wisconsin's Badger Care (low income) program. So the taxpayers are effectively subsidizing WalMart by purchasing health care for their employees.

Medicare for All would alleviate that problem. There is NO free market solution that would do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC