|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:26 PM Original message |
Lawsuit: Campbell's "Regular" And "25% Less Sodium" Tomato Soup Both Contain 480mg Of Sodium |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Strange. I guess it contains 25% less sodium than a glass of ocean water. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. ouch!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:39 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Donate the soup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I added up all the salt in the school breakfast and lunch last month... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. who can I donate the soup to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Not sure where you live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Good luck in your search |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morning Dew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
24. Republicans. n/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
22. Return it to Wal Mart - no receipt required |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 11:25 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. I'd feel better just giving it away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. So I've been getting lied to yet once again by my corporate masters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loudsue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. NONE of the labels reflect the truth about what is inside anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 01:07 AM Response to Reply #16 |
34. i do agree it is part of their business plan! they figure they'll only get sued a little bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. Uh, those weren't intended to be factual statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. LOL...you win the best post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. you are so damn funny!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
12. really? How dishonest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
13. Absolutely un-fucking believable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zanzoobar (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
15. Campbells easily beats out Noxzema. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. This really pisses me off. I haven't had canned soup since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liquorice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 10:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I know what you mean! I have to watch my sodium intake too. At first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lisa0825 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Thanks! I will check them out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
18. Well, Before Their Soups Contained 600mg of Sodium |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
19. "than regular condensed soup." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. well, I agree with you about the importance of learning to read labels, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
25. that is so odd -- the "low-sodium" variety contains 30% less potassium -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-20-11 11:44 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Had a tuna sandwich with a bowl of Campbell's tomato soup and the soup sure was n.a.s.t.y. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prairierose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
28. Since the Consumer pretection agency was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 12:36 AM Response to Original message |
29. They'll win because the "nutrition information" isn't false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbflah (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
31. campbells soup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbdo2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
32. They'll just say it was a printing mistake and be off the hook. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-21-11 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
33. Nice. My grocery store sells the 'low sodium' versions at higher prices. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC