Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speaker Boehner hires attorney/firm with TAXPAYERS' money that charges $460 to $900 'per hour'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:26 PM
Original message
Speaker Boehner hires attorney/firm with TAXPAYERS' money that charges $460 to $900 'per hour'

House Speaker John Boehner has hired former Solicitor General Paul Clement to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, at a cost to the American taxpayer that he has so far refused to reveal (via Think Progress). Because the Department of Justice has decided it will not defend this law, Boehner wants funds from the DOJ to be given to the House to fight it.

Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. has previously criticized that idea, saying Justice Department lawyers have plenty of work to do with the funds they have. Pelosi, in a letter to Boehner in March, requested an estimate of how much the marriage litigation would cost.

In a rejoinder today, Pelosi said she still wants to know what the litigation will cost. “I would like to know when the contract with Mr. Clement was signed, and why a copy was not provided to Democrats on the Committee,” she wrote in a letter to Boehner. (Separately, The National Law Journal has also requested a copy of Clement’s contract.)

Clement’s firm, King and Spalding, charges between $460 and $900 an hour.

http://www.alan.com/2011/04/18/speaker-boehner-wont-reveal-cost-to-defend-anti-gay-law/


Additional short article at CNN: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/18/boehner-hires-top-lawyer-for-fight-over-marriage-law-sources-say/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Does he have the power to do that?
I thought it was the executive branch that had the power to defend or not defend laws in court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You got me. Also, doesn't 'Congress' have a say & have to vote when money is spent? n/t
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 06:34 PM by Tx4obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. unbelievable same old culture wars, thanks for the post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC