Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A statement from the Dem observer who said "numbers jibed" at Nickolaus' press conference.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:05 PM
Original message
A statement from the Dem observer who said "numbers jibed" at Nickolaus' press conference.
It seems as though her presence (as a Democrat figurehead) was needed at the press conference, but she was in the dark about the circumstances & the purpose of the press conference. She was told not to say anything, but due to a reporter's question directly to her, she simply answered that the "numbers jibed", without any qualification to her computer expertise, before she was shooed away from the mike by Nickolaus.

Read her entire statement about how the events unfolded. Another interesting facet of the fishy goings-on in Nickolaus' county.

http://www.orchidforchange.com/parties/waukeshadems.com/ht/display/ArticleDetails/i/1343504/pid/462551

Statement & Account of Ramona Kitzinger, Waukesha Board of Canvassers member since 2004:

Monday, April 11, 2011

(Waukesha County Democratic Party)On Tuesday night, I received a voice message from someone in the office of Clerk Kathy Nickolaus informing me of a Wednesday canvass meeting, which I returned the next morning and said I would be able to report into the canvass by noon – which I did. Normally the canvass would begin at 9am on Thursday, as has been the general practice for many years.  No one explained why they were beginning the canvass on Wednesday, just to please report immediately.
 
Before this telephone call, I had not been contacted as the designated Democratic observer, and I saw no public notice of the abnormal canvass time. The phone call simply instructed me to report by noon to begin the canvass, which I did. The canvass then proceeded as normal, with no glaring irregularities or mention of a possible 15,000 vote error in Brookfield City.
 
On Thursday, I then showed up as per normal procedure at 9am and the canvass again went normally and concluded sometime between 4pm and 5pm. During the course of the day, the issue of minor vote corrections in New Berlin and Lisbon came up, but again nothing of a historic nature or reflecting glaring irregularities. In fact, the matter of vote totals in Brookfield City came up specifically during the course of Thursday’s canvass. In retrospect, it seems both shocking and somewhat appalling there was no mention of discovery of this 15,000 vote “human error” that ultimately had the potential to tip the balance of an entire statewide election. How is this possible?
 
Once the canvass had been completed and the results were finalized, I was called into Kathy’s office along with Pat (the Republican observer) and told of an impending 5:30pm press conference. It was at that point that I was first made aware of an error Kathy had made in Brookfield City. Kathy told us she thought she had saved the Brookfield voter information Tuesday night, but then on Wednesday she said she noticed she had not hit save.  Kathy didn’t offer an explanation about why she didn’t mention anything prior to Thursday afternoon’s canvass completion, but showed us different tapes where numbers seemed to add up, though I have no idea where the numbers were coming from. I was not told of the magnitude of this error, just that she had made one. I was then instructed that I would not say anything at the press conference, and was actually surprised when I was asked questions by reporters.
 
The reason I offer this explanation is that, with the enormous amount of attention this has received over the weekend, many people are offering my statements at the press conference that the “numbers jibed” as validation they are correct and I can vouch for their accuracy. As I told Kathy when I was called into the room – I am 80 years old and I don’t understand anything about computers. I don’t know where the numbers Kathy was showing me ultimately came from, but they seemed to add up. I am still very, very confused about why the canvass was finalized before I was informed of the Brookfield error and it wasn’t even until the press conference was happening that I learned it was this enormous mistake that could swing the whole election. I was never shown anything that would verify Kathy’s statement about the missing vote, and with how events unfolded and people citing me as an authority on this now, I feel like I must speak up.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, discussion here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oops, thanks, Nikki.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Have all the counties been canvassed yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not all... Crawford, Milwaukee and Sauk counties are still being worked on
Edited on Mon Apr-11-11 06:17 PM by PeaceNikki
http://gab.wi.gov/April5SupremeCourt


Milwaukee County will likely not be posted until Wednesday at the earliest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't know, shraby. I just found this through a DKos article & haven't been up to speed
today on the updates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's okay, I've checked and haven't seen anything further.
Myself, I think that the Brookfield totals missing then found is a red herring meant to try to circumvent a full state recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-11-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I believe that I have read that several counties/precincts ran out of ballots early.
Some used photocopied ballots(which cannot be electronically scanned and others used the voting machines. No further mention of either has surfaced.

Biggest red flag however, is that the information was stored on what was essentially a private computer with only one person having access to the material. As we know, the info was to be stored in accessible county computers.

After Ohio in Bush/Kerry, the repugnants have refined their technique to this current mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC