Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

"Strengthening Medicare" by fucking over old sick people.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 03:48 AM
Original message
"Strengthening Medicare" by fucking over old sick people.
The Path to Prosperity
Fiscal Year 2012 Budget Resolution
House Committee on the Budget
Chairman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin

Premium support? a better way to deliver secure benefits?

Starting in 2022, new Medicare bene?ciaries will be enrolled in the same kind of health care program that members of Congress enjoy. Future Medicare recipients will be able to choose from a list of guaranteed coverage options, and they will be given the ability to choose a plan that works best for them. This is not a voucher program, but rather a premium-support model. A Medicare premium-support payment would be paid, by Medicare, to the plan chosen by the beneficiary, subsidizing its cost.

The premium-support model would operate similar to the way the Medicare prescription-drug benefit program works today. The Medicare premium-support payment would be adjusted so that wealthier bene?ciaries would receive a lower subsidy, the sick would receive a higher payment if their conditions worsened, and lower-income seniors would receive additional assistance to cover out-of-pocket costs.

This approach to strengthen the Medicare program ensures security and affordability for seniors now and into the future. First, it ensures security by setting up a tightly regulated exchange for Medicare plans. Health plans that choose to participate in the Medicare exchange must agree to offer insurance to all Medicare bene?ciaries, to avoid cherry-picking and ensure that Medicare?s sickest and highest-cost beneficiaries receive coverage.

While there would be no disruptions in the current Medicare fee-for-service program for those currently enrolled or becoming eligible in the next ten years, all seniors would have the choice to opt into the new Medicare program once it begins in 2022. No senior would be forced to stay in the old program. This budget gives seniors the freedom to choose a plan that works best for them and guarantees health security throughout their retirement years.

Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP: Under Republican control, the House Budget Committee proposes phasing out the traditional Medicare program and replacing it with an insurance exchange offering a variety of private plans with the government's role limited to offering a premium support (same mechanism as a voucher) to apply toward the purchase of a plan. This converts Medicare from a defined benefit (specified benefits are covered) to a defined contribution (the premium support being a specified dollar amount contributed toward the purchase of a private plan).

This proposal treats the budget as the patient, curing the budget problems with the trade off of further burdening the Medicare beneficiaries who are already paying too much out of pocket. It shifts future increases in health care costs from the government to the beneficiaries. It is much easier for Congress to control federal spending by limiting the value of the premium support rather than trying to reduce the benefit package.

The proposal would adjust the premium support for those with greater health care needs, but that is very difficult to do in a timely manner in that an adjustment next year doesn't help to relieve this year's increased costs. Also risk adjusting is very difficult in that it requires having a precise assessment of each individual's health status and anticipated needs. It is a profound change from the current Medicare program in which equitable funding through the tax system is divorced from the uniform benefit package which everyone shares.

The proposal also would reduce premium support for wealthier Medicare beneficiaries, requiring them to pay more for exchange plans. Actually this principle of progressive financing already exists. Although the current standard premium for Medicare Part B is $96.40 for most individuals ($115.40 for new beneficiaries), it is indexed to income. Those with an income of $214,000 pay $438.20 (including an added Part D premium only for higher-income individuals).

Although progressive financing is an equitable concept, it belongs over on the tax revenue side for funding of the entire Medicare risk pool. By having it as a progressive premium on the benefit side, it fractures solidarity by creating a desire for the wealthy to obtain their own coverage and care independently of Medicare, since they are paying higher premiums anyway. Once they are on their own, they would look upon Medicare as a welfare program, not unlike Medicaid except with much fewer benefits, and chronic underfunding would be inevitable.

The debate that we should be having is over an improved Medicare for everyone. The sad state of politics today is certainly exemplified by the fact that those supporting the transfer of wealth from the masses to our plutocracy have been able to reframe the debate as a need to save our federal budget by cutting back on our social programs, especially Medicare and Medicaid (while reducing the tax rate on the wealthy from 35% down to 25%). What ever happened to common decency?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. The nation needs to be one big WI. - put the loonies out to sea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. this is a VOUCHER PROGRAM!! here kid, here's $20... go buy yourself a tv!
how far would that get you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. The current Medicare system is unsustainable...from the NYT.
Their results show that no cohort of Americans, with the possible exception of the very affluent, pays enough I Medicare taxes and premiums to cover their costs. The gap is growing over time, too.

Two married 66-year-olds with roughly average earnings over their lives will end up paying about $110,000 in dedicated Medicare taxes through the payroll tax, including the portion their employers pay. They can expect to receive about $340,000 in benefits. Two average-earning 56-year-olds will pay about $140,000 and get back about $430,000 in benefits.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Which is why we need single payor.
As a country we all share in the risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly. Single payer can also control costs better.
It really beats me why this isn't obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. +100 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-07-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It isn't Medicare that is unsustainable--it is our health care system as a whole
HCR does NOT control costs, which stock brokers understand perfectly well. An analyst at a health care brokerage firm said of health care reform There does not seem to be any onerous cost control. --Les Funtleyder of Miller Tabak, NYT 4-9-2010; Health care overhaul may help a fund sector

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct 23rd 2017, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC