Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teen's proposal to ban funeral protests gets attention from controversial church, legislators

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 07:38 PM
Original message
Teen's proposal to ban funeral protests gets attention from controversial church, legislators
Source: BDN

BELFAST, Maine — It started out as a class history project for 17-year-old Searsport Regional High School student Zach Parker, but the more he learned, the more infuriated he became.

How could a church picket funerals of dead soldiers?

Parker has an uncle in the National Guard who might be deployed next year.

“I can’t even think about if I had to lay him to rest for the last time and I’d have to deal with these people,” he said.



Read more: http://www.bangordailynews.com/story/Midcoast/Teens-bill-to-ban-protesters-from-funerals-gets-attention-from-controversial-church,162479



I guess this counts as four paragraphs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. The crazy thing about the phelps clan,
well one of the other crazy things about the phelps clan, is that they're calvinists who believe that when god set the universe in motion he chose the ones who are going to be saved and nothing you or I do today is going to change that.

Let me put it to you another way; they protest not because they want to save your soul (only THEY are chosen), they protest because they're straight up pricks.

Q3JR4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes, it is called double predestination. Horrible doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. It does rank in the handful of
religious practices that I consider to be the most odious.

Q3JR4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Do the stalker laws apply to this group? That is the very least they
should be charged with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I hadn't considered that, but it is sickeningly true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's about time

That church has been protesting just down the street from our house twice in the last couple years.

K&R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. One hazard that the Westboro pustules pose . . .
Is that their protests, because they are so odious, trigger just this sort of legislative overreach. Cops already routinely set up "free speech zones" — effectively cages in which protestors are temporarily imprisoned when they want to criticize the president or other high officials (often eliciting the comment "I thought the whole country was a free speech zone"). How far down that road do we want to go?

The Westboro goons are deranged notoriety-hags, but they do have first amendment rights — rights that are threatened for all of us because of the (understandable) disgust directed at Westboro. I prefer the opprobrium approach (bikers, students, et al getting between Westboro protestors and their objective) along with judicious closing off of streets around venues. While such measures are inconvenient, they seem more fair (if applied uniformly) and less at the top of a slippery slope than a ban on protests at military funerals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Someone needs to sit this kid down and explain...
the first amendment.

The Phelps are attention whores. The proper way to deal with attention whores is to deny them the attention they crave.

You don't pass laws that erode the first amendment further. While their speech is odious, they have the right to lawfully and peacefully assemble on public property. There is no such thing as freedom from offense.

And once the door is opened to banning a particular type of protest...where does it stop?

Sadly this is the type of pseudo-patriotic bullshit that will unanimously pass if introduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No the Phelps are Terrorist
And should be treated as such. They should be on the No-Fly list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Explain how they are terrorist. Be specific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Sadly I must agree
I detest these cretins and what they do with every fiber of my being. I'm a member of the Patriot Guard Riders myself.

But, what many people don't realize is that laws almost always come with unintended consequences. If they pass a law banning these vermin from staging their protests I guarantee that sometime, somewhere , the law will be cited in support of banning someone elses protest.

The simplest way to make these slugs go away is to turn off the damn cameras, stop writing about them, stop acknowledging the fact that they even exist. When what they truly seek is denied them at every turn, they will eventually go home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Funny how the right wingers didn't care about this group
When it was only protesting homosexual funerals.

In fact many supported the protests back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. Public safety is at jepordy in funeral protests.
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 11:11 PM by buckrogers1965
I am really surprised that no grieving family members haven't gunned down a dozen of these pricks yet. It is only a matter of time until someone does. I doubt that any jury would convict them of any crime.

They should be forced to protest a few miles away from funerals for their own safety. For the safety of innocent bystanders that might also be killed.

Public safety is the the same reason you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. An assault on the 1st amendment isn't the answer to the Phelps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC