Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nice to see that thanks to Ghaddafi's army, people are rediscovering the standards of Nuremberg.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:28 PM
Original message
Nice to see that thanks to Ghaddafi's army, people are rediscovering the standards of Nuremberg.
Suddenly we are discussing here on DU the obligation to disobey illegal orders, and pointing out that the people who were blown away by NATO airstrikes had it coming because they remained loyal to the chain of command, and should rather have stood down.

Ok then, I suppose everyone who didn't lay down arms and refuse to obey, when Bush gave the illegal order to invade Iraq, is guilty of crimes against humanity and crimes against peace, and certainly had coming what came to them.

Correct, or is there a flaw in this simple logic that I am missing? Or are we going to declare that we believe in a double standard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course, it's the American Way!
We are exceptional and the rules do not apply!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. When you get your time traveling DeLorean working
let us know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ethical dilemmas....
Doing what is ethically right results in a bad or worse outcome or effect

VS.

Doing what is ethically wrong results in a good or better outcome or effect


Ethical dilemmas have no easy answers, sometimes there is no solution; every situation is different. More often than not, the second choice above is what people pick, based on the assumption of the goodness of the outcome (the end justifies the means).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. double standards
sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Really? Why didn't we discover those standards of Nuremberg during bush's terms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nuremberg did not indict junior military people.
And you usually go after the officers in those cases anyway.

And yes I damn sure would advocate having Bush and everyone down to SGM taken be looked at with scrutiny and tried.

I'm dead serious.

Gaddafi executes people who disobey orders, so I don't blame them for shooting. Their best option is to defect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wish we'd just openly declare the double standard and avoid all the confusion
The honesty would be refreshing and think of all the time we'd save on grand-standing political speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC