Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So now Social Security Cuts are a Grand Symbolic Gesture to the Stock Market?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:48 AM
Original message
So now Social Security Cuts are a Grand Symbolic Gesture to the Stock Market?
We all know Paul Ryan is a turd sandwich. Recently, he is admitting Social Security cuts will not do anything to ease our deficit, it would, however, make the stock markets really, really happy:

I’m boggled. That just boggles my mind…I would argue, even though, it’s not really a driver of our debt, it’s not a significant part of our debt problems, it would build great confidence, fixing Social Security on a bipartisan basis, because it would tell not only the credit markets that Americans are getting their act together, it would buy us more time and space with them, it would show that our government’s not broken--Paul Ryan via: http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2011/03/17/ryan-social-boggled/

Why aren't Democrats repeating this nonsense from the rooftops? Exposing Ryan and Republicans for what they really are?

Is it because some big wig Democrats actually agree?

The Hill

Geithner and his lieutenants argue that benefits reform will give the markets confidence that Obama and Congress have the will to address the problem of long-term national debt.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/149489-social-security-reform-splits-the-white-house

Digby writes:

This is an interesting insight because what it really illuminates is the fact that Obama’s economic team’s main job is to “send messages” to the bond market. As Krugman has written extensively, this is a particularly bankrupt and almost desperate move that makes little economic sense unless the Treasury Dept has now literally bought into the idea that they need to sacrifice human beings to appease the market Gods.

It’s not reassuring at all that it’s only the political actors who are arguing against cuts because Social Security is not contributing in any way to the deficit or the current economic challenges. The last people who should be advocating for this are the policy people and the fact that they are is very disturbing. It’s either fantasy or corruption.

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/03/grand-bargains-and-adult-conversations.html

It's time to get really vocal with Democrats on this. So far, Harry Reid may be the only obstacle in the way of Social Security cuts. If they cut Social Security to appease the almighty bond market Gods, we have officially and visibly crossed over into the government run by the corporations, for the corporations. I don't doubt it's that way already but at least they used to lie about it. Now they are boldly spewing this crap and expecting us to roll over and accept it because they have a capital "D" next to their names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would like to see where he said it would do nothing for our deficit ever.
The problems are farther out. That is why they aren't talking about current benefits, but about making sure growth in future benefits are contained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Raise the caps and then problem solved
see how easy that was ..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. There is no Social Security problem or crisis. Are you a fan of Ryan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course, Wall Street has been lusting after the SS Fund for eons.
The Boomers are going to be taking more and more out
of Wall St upon retirement and there is a whole lot
of them. They want the SS for gambling money once
the Boomers start pulling out.
Privatize SS once you make the cuts. This has been
the GOP Plan since Reagan first tried.

An awful lot of Seniors got hurt and some wiped out
with the Wall ST. Crash this great recession. I am
sure they thank their lucky stars they at least have SS.

SS is not contributing to the deficit and therefore take
it off the Budget AXE table. Any reform to SS can be done
later and as a stand alone program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I 100% agree. I am disturbed some Democrats agree with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Of course. When they get their hands on it, they will seize the cash by 'fee'ing it to death.
Same ole song and dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. If the market is doing well, they can keep talking about it as if the market = the economy.
It's the biggest lie they've got, and I have no idea why people fall for it over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, it's a lie. I think this stuff is too wonky for your average person on the street
to be interested in studying or understanding. Which sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. That is all anything these monsters do is for
The Wall Street thugs.

The only important factor in any decision made politically or corporately is to appease the investor. The GOP would divest the entire nation lock stock and barrel to make Wall Street happy. Corporations likewise would sell off every last parcel and make nothing if it would reap a profit for the investor.

Never mind tomorrow, it is all about profit today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Excuse me, but why are we discussing cutting SS?
Clearly we have PLENTY of money if we can afford to get involved in a war with Libya. Wall Street needs to "enjoy" the gifts they have already received via the bailouts, not to mention stocks in defense companies will soar because there is yet another war.

It's time to get vocal with D's AND R's and tell them if you keep plunging our nation into war, then you need to stop cutting public services. I'd much rather spend millions on education than I would on wading into a civil war in Libya. We have people in the US dying from lack of health care - I'm more worried about them than I am the people in Libya, and excuse me if that sounds cold.

It's past time for the American people to get extremely pissed off about our adventures in the Middle East while we are busy getting budgets at home sliced to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Agreed. We just need to say exactly that, "Why are we even discussing this??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. On behalf of all decent Wisconsites, I apologize for that POS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. All is proceeding according to plan
I'll admit I'm a bit surprised to see that some of the robber barons are publicly admitting that they're out to cut social security for reasons having nothing to do with the deficit. I guess that lie was just too enormous to sustain anymore. Ryan is basically saying that if we fix this problem, which isn't a problem, it will impress the credit markets. Is Ryan saying that the credit markets are run by really stupid people? Why do we need to impress them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. "Is it because some big wig Democrats actually agree?"
They play for the same team. No question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. The complete disconnect between the good of the people & benefitting the wealthy, in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. Better watch dems! The repuke Michigan gov
promised business tax cuts. Now he proposes to pay for it by taxing old folks income. Fuck old folks = recall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. Raising taxes on the rich is the only way we will show we are serious about reducing our debt.
Fucking up social security will NOT do that - it will simply lower taxes EVEN FURTHER on the wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC