Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK MuthaFuckers - it has had 6 days to Float over here How HIGH is it going to get

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:58 PM
Original message
OK MuthaFuckers - it has had 6 days to Float over here How HIGH is it going to get
Pres. Obama - Time to FUCKING Tell us here on the West Coast - Just how Fucking High is the Rads going to get

Every Fucking Jack Ass in Japan and the USA has been down playing the Shit out of this for 6 Fucking Days

Now I want some truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Say fuck a few more times. It's really effective and makes you seem serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Original message
The anger is palpable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. O - FUCKING - K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. ROLF!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. ...
:thumbsup:

Thanks, Mild-Mannered one!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
60. Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck.
Fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacquelope Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
61. Oh please Obama will you tell us the truth? Oh pretty please? n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. They cannot tell you how bad it will be
because they cannot tell the fucking future. They are NOT telling you how bad it is because they are assholes.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Radiation honchos: Don't worry, be happy. And nice third head there.
SIGH. I'm in Alaska and we get everything first including Palin. I am so on my face in sadness for Japan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. The truth drawing on training
chances are that it will be just barely above normal...

Time\distance.

We may get a few areas that wil be "hot"

And milk could be a concern as the radiation will concentrate in it.

But chances are I got more radiation when I got my foot x-rayed when I broke it, by orders of magnitude...

No, not the happy face brigade.

That said... the old motto works, watch what they do, not what they say. EPA moved equipment to the West Coast, mostly monitoring gear. I am keeping my eye open for yellow duckies..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Radiation can concentrate in milk? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Yes.
That is one of the reasons contamination was so wide spread in the Ukraine. They continued to drink the milk from the Chernobyl area.
Duckie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Why I got my milk yesterday in nice tetrapack containners
:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. ??
The cows were radioactive? The container isn't the issue? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Cow eats pasture
cow process it and goes through mammary glands

It concentrates the radiation in the milk

Radiation will be here.

You really need to read on this. or maybe not... perhaps better not to bother yourself with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Find me a pasture that is ready for grazing
in the next month or so. GFL !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Ah yes, feed for cows cannot be exposed to air
and bunnies run in the meadows and that steam is full of flowers.

Have a good day... rather life... iggy list is great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Why do cattlemen have barns?
To store hay in so they can feed their cattle over the winter.
God! Get some learnin'. 'nough said.eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. That's what I said...
I was confused because the person I replied to sounded like they thought they weren't concerned because they had a good container for their milk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. I got milk that will last a year
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 08:06 PM by nadinbrzezinski
it is the packaging, so having that reduces exposure to close to zero

Brands Horizon, Hershey's or the grand daddy permalat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. OK...now I get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. When I was a kid we had Strontium-90 in milk
Not an "additive" anyone loved:(
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/136/3516/619.abstract
Science 18 May 1962:
Vol. 136 no. 3516 pp. 619-632
DOI: 10.1126/science.136.3516.619
Strontium-90 in Man V
The concentration in the bones of children had been dropping, but recent tests will reverse the trend

1. J. Laurence Kulp and
2. Arthur R. Schulert

+ Author Affiliations

1.
Geochemistry Laboratory, Lamont Geological Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, N.Y.
2.
U.S. Navy Medical Research Unit No. 3, in Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

1) It is now possible to predict the strontium-90 concentration in the world population for specified modes of atmospheric contamination with moderate reliability. For example, the average adult bone level in the eastern United States 5 years after the detonation of a specified quantity of fission products into the lower polar stratosphere can probably be estimated to better than ± 50 percent.

2) The concentration of strontium-90 in fetuses reached a maximum of 1.2 micromicrocuries of strontium-90 per gram of calcium in eastern North America and began to decrease significantly in 1960 and 1961. The ratio of the strontium-90 level in the fetus to the level in the average diet of the adult is about 0.08.

3) The average rate of turnover of strontium and calcium in the adult skeleton appears to be about 2.5 percent per year, although there is considerable difference among the various bones of the body.

4) The standard deviation for strontium-90 concentration in a population of urban adults appears to be about 40 percent of the mean. The distribution curve for an interval of from 60 to 0.1 percent of the population may be approximated by the log-normal function. In urban populations of Western culture the concentration for 5 percent of the population will exceed twice the mean, that for 0.1 percent will exceed four times the mean.

5) Cities in the Southern Hemisphere showed levels in bone about half those for cities of Western culture in the Northern Hemisphere in 1960, yet the fallout in the Southern Hemisphere is only one-fourth that in the Northern Hemisphere. This is attributed to differences in diet, with a higher milk component in the Northern Hemisphere.

6) A simple model for the strontium-90 concentration in the bones of young people as a function of their age appears to fit the experimental data.

7) The coefficients of the equation describing the relative contributions of the rate of fallout (direct absorption) and the cumulative deposit (soil up-take) to the strontium-90 concentration in milk have been calculated from the observed data for 1959 and 1960. They are as follows: rate factor A = 0.65 micromicrocurie of strontium-90 per gram of calcium in milk per millicurie of strontium-90 per square mile during the growing season; cumulative-deposit factor B = 0.12 micromicrocurie of strontium-90 per gram of calcium in milk per millicurie of strontium-90 per square mile at the midpoint of the growing season. The predicted levels in milk for 1958 obtained with these coefficients are in excellent agreement with the observed levels. In 1958 and 1959 about half the strontium-90 in milk was attributable to the rate factor, whereas in 1960 the contribution of the rate factor dropped to about 15 percent.

8) Future levels of strontium-90 in man are given (i) for the next decade as a result of the nuclear tests through 1961 and (ii) under the assumption that 1.0 megacurie of strontium-90 is added to the stratosphere of the Northern Hemisphere each year.

9) The radiation doses to the skeleton to be expected from world-wide fallout on the basis of a 3000-megaton (fission yield) war are also given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. I personally don't care how ofter you say
fuck. I'd like to know as well along with everyone else on the west coast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Battle of the Six Cities.

soldier music vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-mDeBgQXeo


I am due beer and travel money, and many experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chris_Texas Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Original message
Downplaying?
In any case, if the question was: how bad will the radiation be in america, the answer is...

It wont.

And in case you missed the actual news in the middle of the the nightmare speculation and what-ifs, the radiation is not even that bad in Japan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think you'll be proven wrong, Chris_Texas. What news have you been listening
to, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Get your priorities straight, man.
It's bracketology time!


:sarcasm:



TG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. We don't know - they haven't been consistent in their reporting - the head of the
IAEA is going over tomorrow to find out what's really going on, then you might have an answer to your question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. They will just tell us nothing to get all worry about.
The radiation eating-bacteria will take of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. A-hem, I think it's radiation eating fungi...
http://www.physorg.com/news99109064.html

But you're right, nothing for any of us to concern ourselves with. All's A OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. That is so incredibly cool. I predict that in the future, we will all live and travel the galaxy in
giant radiation-eating mushroom-spaceships... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. The only people who are in dire dire straits right now
are the workers at the plants.

Next at risk are the areas around the plants.

I would say of those places, the west coast of the US is by far the best place to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. You can't handle the truth.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well the fact that is he is not a rocket scientist
even the Japanese don't know! How is he supposed to know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, since none of it has gone high enough to get into the
jet stream, you can FUCKING relax a little. There's not an imminent threat. If one appears, you get warned in plenty of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. The DU Lounge is invading GD? I thought a few tokes might help GD chill out!
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. They have been hitting that "radiated weed"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
45. Well, they could have the 100% safe breast milk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. There was strontium 90 in breast milk
from above ground nuclear bomb tests. - If a mammal eats food contaminated with radiation it will get in the milk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Well that's one good reason for not eating at The Olive Garden!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
62. Ok, now we got breastfeeding in the thread. How does radiation affect circumcised penises?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Listening to Lawrence O'Donnell's program and the NRC Chief the potential for
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 07:14 PM by RKP5637
more problems sounds pretty bad ... he was saying that water added in come cases could accelerate the problems (#4 reactor). That some of this is uncharted territory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
23. Probably not very high.
But you can bet that there are plenty of organizations and individuals taking readings so there's no way the truth, whatever it turns out to be, will remain hidden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNLib Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't think anyone knows
We can't even get accurate info on what is exactly happening at the plant. You have potential for 6 reactors to melt down. I don't think that will happen but there is a chance. Chernobyl had one reactor.

Maybe once the US sends that spy plane over they will get a handle on what exactly going on in Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. But I don't think anyone knows what is happening let alone how to predict the ultimate outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
28. Chill, the Wolf is coming directly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. MuthaFuckers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yawnmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. It will be somewhere between fucking 0 rads and one fucking million rads...
Do you really think Pres. Obama can predict how high the Rads will be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. Painful interview with Japanese Govt. Spokesman, they do not want to answer
the statements made by the NRC guy in congress today, namely, Unit 4 has uncovered rods and ... no way to get to them without instant death.. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. TEPCO denied it earlier
the NRC guy got that from Satellite and other assets...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Aha, satellite, that's how they did it high res imaging, check out this site
http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/

Victor Galinsky being interviewed on CNN gets his info here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Great place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. Check this out
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/nhk-world-tv

water dropping .. pretty fruitless looking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Watching, blogging on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Where do you do that?
Is that on DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Aha, thought you might have another spot as well nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. Jesus, that's a cheery report n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. I heard that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
35. When the used rods catch fire, or when the cores catch fire, and it's been confirmed...
Then it's something to worry about.

Thus far, only a few of the spent fuel rods have caught fire. When the whole pile goes up, we're all in deep shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
39. I have been told, from reliable sources.
That anyone that uses fuck more that three times in a paragraph and lives on the west-coast should walk around in a lead suit. I suggest trying a some swimming in deep water while waiting for radiation to arrive, remember to keep the lead suit on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Best chuckle I've had all day! Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jp11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
52. Some Truth, Climate Change is real, this message brought to you by the letter 'C'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
56. Worse case scenario? Try this- A massive meltdown of all 4 cores
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 08:27 PM by TexasProgresive
the superheated fuel burns through the tectonic plate creating a massive volcano that spits the vaporized fuel into the jet stream where it circles the globe dropping radioactive ash world wide- just saying, I mean it could happen.

But you know what is certain- you will die. maybe today and maybe not but one day you will. Sorry to break the news to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dj13Francis Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
57. That, my friend,
is the $64,000 question isn't it... I think that depends on if they can stop the meltdowns and get the situation under control, or if it all goes to shit even more so than it already is.

Here's hoping they get it under control...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
63. If you don't believe them, does it really matter
what they have to say? Maybe you should evacuate just to be on the safe side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC