Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times editorial: Obama, stop defending DOMA!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 04:09 PM
Original message
New York Times editorial: Obama, stop defending DOMA!
via AMERICABLOG: Very important editorial in today's New York Times about DOMA. First, the Obama administration doesn't have to defend that discriminatory law, but it does. Second, the standard of review shouldn't be rational basis when a group of Americans are subject to the discrimination of DOMA, simply because of who they are. It's wrong -- and requires stricter scrutiny by the courts. The DOJ should admit it and argue accordingly:

Two new lawsuits, filed in Connecticut and New York, challenging the Defense of Marriage Act now offer the president a chance to put the government on the side of justice. We urge him to seize it when the administration files its response, which is due by March 11. The executive branch’s duty to defend federal laws is not inviolate. This one’s affront to equal protection is egregious.

As in the Massachusetts cases, there are two crucial questions here. The overarching one, of course, is whether it is constitutional for the federal government to deny benefits to some people who are legally married under their state’s laws. Much also depends on the standard of review. How should courts evaluate claims that a law discriminates against gay people?

On the merits, this should be an easy call. A law focusing on a group that has been subjected to unfair discrimination, as gay people have been, is supposed to get a hard test. It is presumed invalid unless the government proves that the officials’ purpose in adopting the law advances a real and compelling interest. That sort of heightened scrutiny would challenge the administration’s weak argument for upholding the act. It would also make it more difficult to sustain other forms of anti-gay discrimination, including state laws that deny same-sex couples the right to marry.

By now, such blatant discrimination should be presumed to be unconstitutional, and the Justice Department should finally say so. If conservatives in Congress want to enter the case to argue otherwise, so be it.


These cases are going to be working their way through the system over the next couple years. Every time the Obama administration defends DOMA, there's going to be a blow up. The geniuses at the White House, DOJ and on the campaign should fix it. Arguing for stricter scrutiny would be a helpful step -- even if it makes Republicans mad.

http://gay.americablog.com/2011/02/nyt-doma-cases-give-obama-chance-to-put.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TriMera Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC