Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush, Rumsfeld and Iraq: Is the Real Reason for the Invasion Finally Emerging?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 12:54 PM
Original message
Bush, Rumsfeld and Iraq: Is the Real Reason for the Invasion Finally Emerging?
http://readersupportednews.org/off-site-opinion-section/376-bush-administration/4932-bush-rumsfeld-and-iraq-is-the-real-reason-for-the-invasion-finally-emerging

By Russ Baker on February 6, 2011

In Donald Rumsfeld’s new book, Known and Unknown, out February 8, Rumsfeld offers an account of George W. Bush’s early interest in Iraq. This was just days after the 9/11 attacks. There were no apparent reasons for Bush to focus on Iraq, instead of on the actual perpetrators of the attacks.

Here’s the Rumsfeld version as reported in an advance peek from The New York Times,

Just 15 days after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush invited his defense secretary, Donald H. Rumsfeld, to meet with him alone in the Oval Office. According to Mr. Rumsfeld’s new memoir, the president leaned back in his leather chair and ordered a review and revision of war plans — but not for Afghanistan, where the Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington had been planned and where American retaliation was imminent.

“He asked that I take a look at the shape of our military plans on Iraq,” Mr. Rumsfeld writes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rummy feigns surprise? Hmm, wasn't he one of the signers
of a letter to Clinton BEGGING him to attack Iraq? Puh-frickin-lease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. PNAC - yes I beleive he was, right along with Cheeny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. This is a known, known -yet he does not make it known in his book.
Therefore, it must be one of his unknown knowns.

PNAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. One of my all-time fav limericks about Rumsferatu (from the DUer
alcibiades_mystery):

There once was a Sec of Defense
Whose prose was Excessively Dense
His Philosopher's Stone
Was an Unknown Unknown -
I'll Be Damned If It Made Any Sense

More RummyDummy limericks:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2642693
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Letter to President Bush on the War on Terrorism - September 20, 2001
The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President,

We write to endorse your admirable commitment to “lead the world to victory” in the war against terrorism. We fully support your call for “a broad and sustained campaign” against the “terrorist organizations and those who harbor and support them.” We agree with Secretary of State Powell that the United States must find and punish the perpetrators of the horrific attack of September 11, and we must, as he said, “go after terrorism wherever we find it in the world” and “get it by its branch and root.” We agree with the Secretary of State that U.S. policy must aim not only at finding the people responsible for this incident, but must also target those “other groups out there that mean us no good” and “that have conducted attacks previously against U.S. personnel, U.S. interests and our allies.”

In order to carry out this “first war of the 21st century” successfully, and in order, as you have said, to do future “generations a favor by coming together and whipping terrorism,” we believe the following steps are necessary parts of a comprehensive strategy.

Osama bin Laden

We agree that a key goal, but by no means the only goal, of the current war on terrorism should be to capture or kill Osama bin Laden, and to destroy his network of associates. To this end, we support the necessary military action in Afghanistan and the provision of substantial financial and military assistance to the anti-Taliban forces in that country.

Iraq

We agree with Secretary of State Powell’s recent statement that Saddam Hussein “is one of the leading terrorists on the face of the Earth….” It may be that the Iraqi government provided assistance in some form to the recent attack on the United States. But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism. The United States must therefore provide full military and financial support to the Iraqi opposition. American military force should be used to provide a “safe zone” in Iraq from which the opposition can operate. And American forces must be prepared to back up our commitment to the Iraqi opposition by all necessary means.

http://newamericancentury.org/Bushletter.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. NO - it was 1998 to then Pres. Clinton
same Jackasses thou
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Yes, that one was already mentioned...
I was showing this one to show just how much PNAC had been banging the war drums. Following PNAC has been one of my "passions" for many years now...


Peace,

Ghost

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Opportunistic war criminal
is all that should be thought of W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have always thought that W. wanted to invade Iraq because he felt his father's
military engagement with that country had been unsuccessful. I believe he wanted to punish Iraq for not respection his father after that "incomplete" war.
W. is a very emotionally troubled, insecure and immature person, and I believe still that he invaded Iraq just to prove a point and for pay back.
He killed many thousands of people and ruined the US economy to do it, and ended proving absolutely nothing. He is a disgrace to the US, and should be in prison, as should his cohorts and those who blindly followed him and made this war possible.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. +1,000
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yep, I've also always thought the same thing - that he wanted to rescue Poppy's balls from the
sands of Iraq.
+a brazillion for your post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. NOT A CHANCE - Bush did it because Cheeny & Rummy told him to
Bush was/is the "High Functioning Moron" of the family who never had an original thought in his life.

Bush invaded Iraq because he was told to - plain and simple. Yes "Simple" like his mind. Rummy and Cheeny had planned for years the invasion of Iraq as outlined in their 1998 PNAC document.

What we are witnessing now is Rummy attempting to clean up his image
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. THIS. It's ridiculous to think that Junior made ANY decisions while in office...
other than whether he was going to have a Jack and Coke or a straight-up Scotch before passing out on the Oval Office couch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Maybe we should call him and ask....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Oil, that is...
Black gold... Texas tea...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. This.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Every Rumsfeld claim in defending his intentions should not go unanswered.
With so much misinformation to debunk, here's an article with a brief summary of what former generals under Rumsfeld's underqualified & arrogant command had to say about him. Also included is a wealth of various links for further reading:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Rumsfeld_and_the_Generals

Rumsfeld, you were a liar then & you're still a shameless liar (when defending your own interests).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. This confirms what Richard Clarke said years ago.
Bush planned the war well before 9/11 as a personal vendetta against the man who had plotted to assassinate his father.

Cheney jumped on board because he saw it as a way to grab Iraq's oil, going so far as to divvy up the oil fields in his secret energy policy meetings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. The day after Cheney told Junior what to do.
Halliburton needed Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. +1. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Whats so fucked about the whole deal is
dick and w thought just because something was planned in a country it was grounds to invade, killing and destroying and staying on continuing the killing and destroying as long as the people will allow it was justified. Throw the whole cabal in jail and let time sort it all out but lock their asses up now.
In a fair trial they all are going to be sentenced to life at the very least so get their asses in jail now. The mofo's are guilty and a whole world, save for a few dumb asses, watched as it was all happening so its not a question of guilt the only question should be what to do with their sorry asses that would be justified by the crimes they committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Junior was talking about getting Iraq during his 1st presidential bid
He mentioned Iraq in nearly every debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. He is a spoiled little man who was pushed very much farther than he
should have gone. I agree he was a figurehead, but I can't see him as merely a tool-he is a nasty, evil disturbed person in his own right, surrounded by others like him but more sophisticated.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Bush tortured animals when he was young
and has no remorse for torturing people. He'd do it again.

That's one sick bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Little turd from Crawford though he'd pull an ENRON on the Oil Patch
It worked for Poppy's pals in 1990. Prices skyrocketed, tripling, quadrupling the "worth" of the oil in the Middle East. Smirko's pals made money, then, too. Remember how HARKEN Energy got selected over companies that knew how to run offshore drilling operations by Bahrain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Funny, I remember Rumsfeld on TV talking about Iraq the day after the attack.
The very next day. The revisions of history started on September 11 and they haven't let up since. It was the pretext that PNAC needed to wage a war against Iraq and that is what we did, starting immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. PNAC, PNAC, PNAC!!!
The whole bunch of them, including Cheney and Rummy were pissed that Bush #1 didn't go to Baghdad at the end of Gulf War 1.

Bush #2 and 9/11 gave them their opportunity to go back in time and "correct" that mistake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. Interesting - the kindle edition of the book costs more than print edition
And some of the comments on amazon are just plain fun:

http://www.amazon.com/Known-Memoir-ebook/product-reviews/B004I1JC5Q/ref=cm_cr_pr_link_1?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending

5.0 out of 5 stars The RUMSTUD!, February 10, 2011
By Sabinuh von Blinsky "Sizzlin'" (At the Dark End of the Street) - See all my reviewsThis review is from: Known and Unknown: A Memoir (Hardcover)
I love this book because I've had a crush on Don Rumsfeld ever since I first saw him on FoxNews.

I used to watch him run circles around those pesky reporters in the Pentagon briefing room who were trying to get to the bottom of what was going on in Iraq or Afghanistan or whatever, and I would literally get weak in the knees with lust! President GW Bush had it right when he gave Rumsfeld a nickname: the RUMSTUD! No wonder Bush didn't fire him after Abu Ghraib!

I just wish the RUMSTUD had included more details about his days as a competitive wrestler, and some pictures of himself in the locker room at Princeton. I'd much rather think about the RUMSTUD with his sweaty wrestling singlet peeled down to his waist then about Condoleeza Rice in her Ferragamo pumps. I like to fantasize that one afternoon (while my husband is out playing golf with his hedge fund buddies) the RUMSTUD invades our bedroom and puts me in a full nelson while Bill O'Reilly works me over with a falafel. I hope you get the picture!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. bu$h* had his sights on iraq from the day he was installed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC