Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karen Sortito, Who Told 007 to Start Drinking Smirnoff, Dies at 49

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:44 AM
Original message
Karen Sortito, Who Told 007 to Start Drinking Smirnoff, Dies at 49
Karen Sortito, Who Told 007 to Start Drinking Smirnoff, Dies at 49


Karen Sortito, a movie-marketing executive who pushed the limits of product tie-ins when she put the world’s most famous Aston Martin driver, James Bond, behind the wheel of a BMW and put him in business with Visa cards, Smirnoff vodka, Heineken beer and even L’Oréal lipstick (“Bond Bordeaux”), died in Manhattan on Monday. She was 49.

The cause was cancer, her sister Diane Ritucci said.

A specialist in what marketers call brand enhancement, Ms. Sortito was at the forefront in a relatively new era of product tie-ins in the movies. (The era is generally acknowledged to have begun in 1982, when the shy, stranded alien in “E.T.” is lured out of hiding with a trail of Reese’s Pieces.) Moving from New York to Los Angeles in the late 1980s, she worked for 20th Century Fox, MGM/UA and other Hollywood film companies, earning a reputation for being a character herself, brash, spikily intelligent and forthright to a fault.

“If she was passionate about something, you didn’t want to be on the other side of the table,” said Tom Sherak, the president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, who was her boss at Fox and at Revolution Studios. “I once bought her a pair of boxing gloves.”

Ms. Sortito came to prominence in 1995 when, helping to rejuvenate the James Bond franchise for MGM, she created a tie-in for the film “GoldenEye” with BMW, putting a new Bond (Pierce Brosnan) in a new model, the sleek and sporty Z3; sales of the car spiked (Ms. Sortito bought one herself), and the film was No. 1 at the box office its opening week.



http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/business/19sortito.html?_r=2&hpw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. 49 Years and her legacy is the ruination of "artistic" endeavors.
Oh well. Shame for even someone useless to die so young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't think it's the ruination of anything
Movies are extremely expensive to produce. To be honest, the only product placement I've ever noticed in the two newer Bond films is Sony/Erickson phones a couple of times. Other than that it was completely unobtrusive. And if that kind of product placement helps get the art made, then I see nothing wrong with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. bond flicks are underwritten by the MI complex in britain
they are propaganda films. they made the cold war sexy.

if bond drives a BMW instead of Austin Martin I don't see what is ruined.

major feature films are a business first, very few of them are Art I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. how kind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Bond films are "art"?
I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very_Boring_Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Art is in the eye of the beholder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Good Bond movies - Goldfinger, Goldeneye, Casino Royale, Quantum Of Solace
The rest have some good and some bad, but those are the ones that really stand out to me, IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hate to speak ill of the dead, but this woman embodied why
Hollywood movies have sucked for the last thirty years or so. Evil, evil, evil. Thanks, lady. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Evil Evil Evil?
Because of product placement? Seriously?

Don't you think that's a bit of an overreaction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Have you seen the "Hamlet" in which King Hamlet's ghost disappears
by walking INTO a Pepsi or Coke machine? The camera remains focused on the machine for some time after the ghost disappears.

It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic. But maybe I do overreact . . . ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LawnLover Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes, you do.
Edited on Sun Dec-19-10 11:48 AM by LawnLover
Evil Evil Evil is not a company trying to sell a product in whatever way they can, or a movie company trying to finance a movie through product placement.

Evil is that company using foreign slaves to make their product or taking away pensions from their workers or destroying mom and pop businesses, etc.

If you call something as innocuous as product placement evil, you dilute the REAL evil in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. We may never know for sure, but I suspect Big Tobacco was paying
for cigarettes to be included in sexy scenes in movies long before this lady came down the pike.

In many earlier movies, the smoking of cigarettes is just awkward and distracting, and feels grafted on. But no doubt this imprinted "smoking is sexy" in the minds of the young, and judging from the distracting intrusions of smoking in recent Columbia-Tristar movies, it still works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. films have sold things since the beginning
ideas mostly (like stereotypes and prejudice) but also clothing, other movies (serials), toys, soundtracks and wars.

seems pretty unfair to put that on one person, especially one who was 20 years old and not working in the film biz when Speilberg put Reese's pieces in E.T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Perspective, dude.
Serial killers are evil. Putting Bond in a BMW is just marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Y'all gotta understand:
Um, I was engaging in a bit of humorous hyperbole. People do that. Examples? Dialogue from the "Eegah!" episode of Mystery Science Theatre 3000 (Pay close attention to the "Styx/Hitler" section):

Crow: Ow!
Joel: Oh, I'm sorry, pal. I'm just so distracted. I can't stop thinking about that sweet service station in today's film. Did you guys notice how sleek and beautiful it was?
Servo: Um, no, Joel, I can't say that I did, heh-heh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Attempt to walkback stupid comments FAIL. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Oh JE-sus christ.
Edited on Sun Dec-19-10 05:57 PM by RandomKoolzip
Like you can read my mind, super-genius. Go sit on a knife.

On edit: why the fuck am I trying to defend my words to a) a total stranger, and b) a total stranger who, going by his/her posts, appears to be a humorless knuckleknob? Fucking hell, this place sucks. Now I know why I take year-long vacations from DU. The little insight I glean simply doesn't outweigh the pain and boredom of having to endure the total assholery.


On second edit: "Fail" is so 2008. "Fail" in all caps is Dec. 31, 2007. :eyesroll:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. She was EVIL because you don't like movies?
Jesus - get a GRIP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Grip my ass.
See my post above, hondo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cancer takes the Marketeer to its bosom. She's home now.
Leaving aside the placement of Smirn-ugghh in that juvenile male whack-off fantasy character's hand, who was it in the first place that told him that SHAKING a martini was acceptable? That is a fucking horrible thing to do to a martini.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Yeah, that c*** had it coming, huh?
I can't believe this place when people die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. After reading some of the replies, I had to check my URL.

Yup, still on DU.

:wow:

Rest easy, Ms. Sortito...sorry you don't pass the DU Purity Test©.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I've been doing that a lot, particularly lately
I was going to write something laudatory about Al Franken, only to find he'd been thrown under the bus.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. or the NYT test
hope the author of that article doesn't stumble on to an Austin Powers film as it might be shockingly blasphemous.

Maybe it is because I knew her but I don't recall the Times taking a dump on the grave quite like that for others. First of all James Bond is a fictional character (apparently a sacred one to some) so Karen didn't tell a fictional character to do anything. The Bond franchise was never Karen's to control. Not even remotely. It is an amorphous creature, some might say 'an octopussy.' There are unauthorized books and parodies, spin-offs and clones. Bond movies make hard alcohol, cigarettes and tiny guns look sexy. But an obit (?) like this just makes the NYT look naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I totally agree with you. I'm not entirely familiar with how the NYT normally
does obits, but this seems singularly mean and petty.

Sorry about your colleague, Kurt.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. I worked with this woman in the early '90s
wow. Karen Sortito and Tom Sherak. That was like a lifetime ago. We worked in the same division and she interviewed me for a job that was open. I didn't get it and worked on the Academy Awards instead. wow

A smart, honest, stylish woman in a tough business. and she's my age

good bye Karen :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. No need for tears- look upthread. She was evil. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Marketing tie-ins and James Bond predate Karen Sortito.
I remember reading the John Gardner James Bond novels back in the '80's. I don't remember all of the products mentioned by name in the books, but I do remember American Express popping up seemingly on every other page...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't know about E.T. being first.


Keenan Wynn and the Coke machine came before that.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. Rest in peace.
Edited on Sun Dec-19-10 12:54 PM by devilgrrl
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. Marketing tie-ins have ruined artisitc integrity.
To quote Bill Hicks - "I bet you guys sleep like fucking babies at night. What did you do today honey? We just made arsenic children's food. We just asked the question are your kids screaming too much at night?".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. She ruined James Bond, because Bond films are all about art
Apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC