Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Trillion Dollars a Year to the Richest 1%...7 times more than all state deficits combined

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 02:15 AM
Original message
A Trillion Dollars a Year to the Richest 1%...7 times more than all state deficits combined
If you make less than $114,000 a year (90% of us), you've been financially damaged by the flow of income to the richest 1% of Americans over the past 30 years. Based on Internal Revenue Service figures, if middle- and upper-middle class families had maintained the same share of American productivity that they held in 1980, they would be making an average of $12,500 more per year...

U.S. GDP has quintupled since 1980, and we all contributed to that success. It's not unreasonable to say that upper-middle class families should have maintained the same size of their slice of pie.

But if earnings since 1980 were based on this measure of productiveness, the richest 1% of Americans would be making $1 trillion less per year.

A trillion dollars a year. That's more than we spend on the entire military.

A trillion dollars a year. That's seven times more than the budget deficits of all 50 states combined.

A trillion dollars a year. Yet Congress just voted to continue the Bush tax cuts...

Taxing them is not "soaking the rich." The greatest redistribution of income in history has taken place over the last 30 years, and the victims are beginning to make a fuss about it.

http://socialistworker.org/blog/critical-reading/2011/01/23/obsence-wealth-us-elite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Remember GHWB's "A thousand points of light" ? That means the rest in darkness.
It's not neo-conservatism, it's neo-feudalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. No man should be so rich he has nothing left to buy but his government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. The rich will always insist that they deserve some portion of our money
as a payment, as fee, a tax, a gift, just because it will add to their wealth. They don't care what the justification is. They don't even think their needs to be one. Just so long as they keep getting another sliver of wealth from each and every one of us. Those slivers add up.

They know that all those slivers of wealth redirected from us to them amount to class warfare, and that they have always been winning. They know that they have always been nickeling and dimeing us to death for their own benefit, and that is how they stay wealthy.

Add another regressive tax that takes from us and gives to them. And another. Then find ways to make us pay for the privilege of being poor. Add more fees. Add surcharges. Add taxes to those fees and surcharges. Let their companies collect all that money and give it to to them. In hundreds of ways the money moves upwards from them to us, and it isn't just in unequal salaries, because that is just one of the ways.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. These people are insufficiently taxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, I agree.
I think everyone here definitely agrees.

If their wealth is based on parasitically sucking our society's wealth upward (and it definitely is) then the solution must be to use society's basic legitimate means of equitable wealth redistribution. Progressive Taxation.

Add a robust variety of safety nets to that for those in need, paid for with all that tax money, and we would have a much better and healthier society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
machI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. The tax code should address the lop sidedness of income
The wealthiest should be given a choice with the tax code:

    Invest a substantial portion of income to help prosper the economy for all citizens

    OR

    The Government will tax away a portion of income and invest in the economy



The choice would be clear, invest and keep or face higher taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. yes this is a huge problem
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. it's THE problem that causes all the others. concentrated wealth = concentrated power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. The more they push, the more....
that water balloon is gonna bulge out the other way, push too much and it's gonna pop. Soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. and they pay nothing for the wars that creates their wealth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. On military spending when you add in veteran's benefits,
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 09:02 AM by mmonk
research and development, the VA, etc., I think it comes to a little over $1.3 trillion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Don't knock the VA. It's backdoor stimulus. Veteran's spend their money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. We cannot sustain 2 more years of this shit. Someone is trying to kid someone else. It's not
working. We are done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
14. recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC