Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

President Obama indicates flexiblity on cliff negotiation issues.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-05-12 06:07 AM
Original message
President Obama indicates flexiblity on cliff negotiation issues.
As for another sticking point in the negotiations, entitlement programs, the president also indicated an openness to make concessions to programs like Medicare. Based on the negotiators opening arguments, both sides are far apart. Boehner's proposal calls for $900 billion in mandatory spending cuts, much of it coming from Medicare, compared to $600 billion the president proposed.

"I'm happy to be flexible," Mr. Obama said, adding that he says he's not going to get "100 percent" of what he wants. "I am willing to look at anything that strengthens" Medicare, he said. When asked whether he would support raising the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 67, the president demurred but didn't outright reject the idea.

The president also seemed to indicate he is willing to cut slightly more from discretionary spending, which includes education, disaster relief, national parks and other government programs.

"There's probably more cuts that we can squeeze out," he said, but he continued to point to the $1 trillion worth of cuts Congress passed last year without any increases in revenue, and he said he's not going to cut programs that hurt the middle class, seniors and college students.

In what seems like an effort to repair his strained relationship with some in the business community, Mr. Obama also said he'd like to give business leaders a more prominent role in his administration, but he blamed the Senate confirmation process that causes private-sector executives to "shy away" from government service. /

The President also said that taxes had to go up on those making over $250K a year, though not necessarily to Clinton Administration levels. And not necessarily permanently.

Isn't it odd how the President is willing to end run around Congressional negotations on some things, but is hands off on others?
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-06-12 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Funny.
I am hearing from the Rachel Maddow program that Republicans nationally poll even slightly higher than Democrats on leaving the medicare enrollment age alone.

Republican legislators, however, continue to use language that implies this fiscal cliff issue is about future spending, when, in fact, it is about past spending. They say things like raising the debt ceiling would be like giving President Obama a blank check for wild unrestrained spending. This simply is not true. But Republican voters universally wallow in this fundamental misunderstanding.

Little wonder, this misunderstanding is rabidly fostered by Fox "News", Limbaugh and the others. WTF? Of course these same Republican voters believe Obama is engaged in an orgy of wild spending.

Why don't Administration spokespersons refute this wild spending meme? This is a mystery to me. Does this meme serve them in some mysterious way?

Why don't we just tell the truth for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan 19th 2018, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC