"Teahadists" -- will it catch on?

[Towlie]

In the Daily KOS article http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2011/1/21/937886/-Romney-steers-clear-of-tea-party">Romney steers clear of tea party, Jed Lewison uses the term "teahadists", which I haven't seen before. Is it appropriate? Perhaps it has some potential to replace "teabaggers."

[yurbud]

1. too esoteric

[Turborama]

2. I've been using it since at least March last year

EG: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=385&topic_id=448687

6,300 results on Google at the time of posting: http://www.google.com/search?q=Teahadists&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8

[meegbear]

3. +1

Those Kos people are way behind the curve. Hipsters my ass.

[reflection]

4. I'm partial to Tealiban. n/t

[Xithras]

7. Hadn't seen that before, but I LIKE it! n/t

[elocs]

5. Here, yes. In general, no. ObamaCare sure caught on fast and stuck though.

Why weren't our economic troubles ever called the "Bush Recession" because that would have been accurate?

[Erose999]

6. It already has at DU, I see it here often. Has a nice ring to it because they are pretty much

fundamentalist extremists who want to oppress everyone but themselves, and support terror all over the world.

[tblue37]

8. I don't see any good reason to replace "teabaggers." They chose the name themselves! (LOL) nt