Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Asked To Sit Out Supreme Court Health Care Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:29 PM
Original message
Clarence Thomas, Elena Kagan Asked To Sit Out Supreme Court Health Care Case

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/26/thomas-kagan-supreme-court-health-care_n_1113980.html

Conservative interest groups and Republican lawmakers want Justice Elena Kagan off the health care case. Liberals and Democrats in Congress say it's Justice Clarence Thomas who should sit it out.

Neither justice is budging – the right decision, according to many ethicists and legal experts.

None of the parties in the case has asked the justices to excuse themselves. But underlying the calls on both sides is their belief that the conservative Thomas is a sure vote to strike down President Barack Obama's health care law and that the liberal Kagan is certain to uphold the main domestic achievement of the man who appointed her.

The stakes are high in the court's election-year review of a law aimed at extending coverage to more than 30 million people. Both sides have engaged in broad legal and political maneuvering for the most favorable conditions surrounding the court's consideration of the case.

-very long snip-
------------------

will they or won't they...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. What we have right now is a game of Chicken.
Kagan won't recuse herself and leave Scalia and/or Thomas to decide this issue and vice versa. There is no constitutional mechanism to compel a justice to sit out an argument and decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thomas should sit out all cases...
He has conflicts of interests in too many of them; in the others, he's too stupid to understand the arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hell, Thomas and his wife should be in federal prison
for running a judicial influence-peddling bribery operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. We should simply start from scratch...
Send them all home and start over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. +1000 The Great SCOTUS reboot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC