Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the 99% be TIME's Person of the Year 2011? - Vote yes / no

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 02:48 AM
Original message
Should the 99% be TIME's Person of the Year 2011? - Vote yes / no
Edited on Sat Nov-12-11 02:48 AM by flamingdem
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2098471_2098472_2098498,00.html?xid=poywalk-tweet

On Sept. 17, about 2,000 people amassed on Wall Street to protest corporate greed and influence in government. They didn't succeed in occupying all of the financial district, or even all of Wall Street, but they have taken and held a small urban park in lower Manhattan around the corner from Ground Zero. In the early weeks of the demonstrations, a core group of protesters set up a complex tent city from which they organized large marches and rallied around the slogan "We are the 99%." The movement has since gone national, with rallies and "occupations" in dozens of cities across the U.S., from Oakland, where confrontations with the police became violent, to Atlanta, where protesters expanded the group's mandate by occupying a house to prevent a bank from taking it in foreclosure. As they prepare for what will be a long and cold winter, the Occupy Wall Street protesters say they are deciding what will be next in their struggle, but they've already succeeded in changing the national conversation from a focus on the debt to one of income inequality, opportunity ...

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2098471_2098472_2098498,00.html #ixzz1dRZkrdU3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice! It should be 99%, but it is 74% and that is pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bengalherder Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ah Time will do their bait and switch dance again.
I'm sure they'll wind up some usual shill as their POY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. 75% YES
Considering all that the corporate media have done to denigrate and vilify, I consider this figure astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Probably won't happen
If they do they would fold it into 'the protester' and include the Arab Spring. If they go the 'mass' route like that they might even limit it to the Arab spring and leave out OWS entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOMOREDRUGWAR Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I voted for Anonymous instead
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good choice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. I voted for the 99%, but Elizabeth Warren's a good choice, too.
As are the Fukushima 50, Anonymous, Arab Youth Protestors and Gabrielle Giffords.
Is anyone else smiling because Kim Kardashian has more votes than Michelle Bachmann?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. All DUers that are on Facebook share this on your wall to support OWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Didn't Julian Assange win this vote last year?
And the Time editors just ignored it...I mean, what's the point in voting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. i voted yes on 99%, anonymous, warren & no on 1%, cantor, paul ryan, bachman, cain, romney...
to see results you have to vote. All my nos had very high nos, low yeses. Especially Cain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. go OWS, 99% is at 80%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaaaaa5a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. No....
Edited on Sat Nov-12-11 01:58 PM by aaaaaa5a

Sadly, the 99% haven't done enough with regards to changing this country to deserve it.



I voted for the arab protestors, because they ACTUALLY brought about REAL CHANGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-12-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. now at 84%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC