Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Elizabeth Warren: I Created 'Occupy Wall Street'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:47 PM
Original message
Elizabeth Warren: I Created 'Occupy Wall Street'
Massachusetts Senate candidate, consumer activist, and Wall Street Enemy #1 Elizabeth Warren took credit for the Occupy Wall Street movement in a new interview with The Daily Beast.

“I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do,” she told Samuel Jacobs. “I support what they do.”



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street-2011-10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. This won't go over well with the Occupy crowd. Big mistake. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I'm pretty sure that OWS is smart enough to read the entire article and realize
that this is an attempt to misrepresent Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
55. Yes. At no time did she actually say, "I Created 'Occupy Wall Street'"
This is how they work, people. They will just make stuff up and hope it sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Al Gore invented the internet.
If she really said this she has a foot-in-mouth problem. If not I assume it's just more responsible journalism from our awesome American media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. +1... hopefully enough people have learned from the Al Gore treatment. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. EXACTLY the same thing ...
Gore never said he CREATED the internet, but said something along these lines that the right wing just ran with it, and the "liberal media" just parroted.

We need BOLD and fearless dems, but why make it easy for the right to negatively spin what you say ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. the funny thing about gore was that he was mocked for all his "information superhighway" talk
they mocked him for talking non-stop about the internet, sponsoring funding for the internet, pushing every government agency to construct a user-friendly website, pushing every government agency to make reams of information available online.

and then they mocked him for saying that he did more than anyone else IN CONGRESS to create the internet, a statement that no one with actual comprehension of the english language or of the history of the internet could possibly dispute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #56
77. "I took the initiative in creating the internet"
Pretty difficult to spin that any other way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnFJ8cHAlco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
72. Pacific Bell in their ads many years back claimed "they invented the internet"...
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 02:20 PM by cascadiance
... far more than Al Gore did. I really wish I could find one of them on the internet now. People go back through your old VHS tapes, etc. from that time to see if you can dig one of them up. A youtube of that would be a perfect response to people yammering about Al Gore's statements which are far more truthful than what Pacific Bell made a point of pushing in those days.

Of course corps won't DARE try to take credit for anything to do with what OWS is doing now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
86. GMTA
My brain went right there, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
96. Al was able to say that WITHOUT using the word "invented." Amazing. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
101. That was the first thing that came to my mind when I read the OP. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh good ...
"I Created 'Occupy Wall Street'". "I Created the internet". The memes just write themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ship of Fools Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Uh oh ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngkorWot Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yo, OWS, I'm really happy for you
Imma let you finish but Elizabeth Warren is the greatest protest movement of all time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
70. I'm not surprised at who's anxiously running with this lame smear. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. Me neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. With modesty like that she is going to be right at home in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. The "intellectual foundation" is common sense. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Great. Because another "I invented the internet" is all we need.
I'm willing to bet this completely out-of-context interpretation of what she said will end up biting her in the ass.

This movement didn't start because of one person. This movement started because the boot finally gets uncomfortable to some after a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't you think it could have been taken out of context?
Gore's "quote" about the internet was taken out of context and was never corrected until after the damage was done and the election was over.

It wouldn't be the first time the MSM took a quote out of context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
46. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. I love how they create the misleading impression the title is a quote.
not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Good catch - shame on 'Business Insider'.
The source article draws no such conclusion. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. To email the author:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Daily Beast -- Who's Afraid of Elizabeth Warren?
The Harvard professor has spooked the right. As she begins her high-profile Senate campaign against GOP star Scott Brown in Massachusetts, the consumer advocate tells Samuel P. Jacobs how she created 'much of the intellectual foundation' for the Occupy Wall Street movement. She also talks about her past life as a Republican and the challenges of being a woman on the campaign trail—and says she's no 'guileless Marxist.'

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/24/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Keith Olbermann is also taking some credit
The other week he replayed one of his special rants where some time ago he called for a grass roots uprising (my paraphrase).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. I believe Robert Reich, Ted Rall and others also called for grass roots action
How much influence anyone had individually remains open for debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
47. And Al Gore did on Countdown. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #47
91. i missed that interview. thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacoD Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
57. If any one person can be given credit for OWS
It's Kalle Lasn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tcaudilllg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #57
78. Everyone who supports this movement deserves the credit.
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 02:40 PM by tcaudilllg
Leadership is one thing, credit is another.

OWS is so many ideas... which one is she taking credit for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
81. AND Michael Moore. Hey, I don't frickin' CARE! As long as SOMEBODY got it going.
As long as SOMEBODY's message was heard and internalized SOMEWHERE!

Hey, look - let's not start dumping on her, too, okay? Geez! Soften her up and shoot her so full of holes so that the jackals and weasels can eat her more easily? SHEESH!

Please understand - we are LUCKY AS HELL that we have at least SOME voices out there, raising themselves above the fray, so that they start getting noticed, and getting face time, and starting to make waves and attract followers and start educating people. Sometimes you need several advanced algebra teachers, and maybe even a couple of tutors, before you find even ONE who explains it Just Perfectly, that it finally jells in your brain and starts making sense and you start "getting it," in ways you couldn't with anybody else trying to explain it to you.

I think we need 1000 Elizabeth Warrens! And 1000 Robert Reichs! And 1000 Paul Krugmans! And 1000 Michael Moores! And 1000 Ted Ralls! The more, and more varied, the messengers (or teachers, if you will), the more likely the lesson will be able to sink in somewhere and with more of us students.

I'll take them ALL! Because they ALL will help the movement and buoy it up and give it strength and solidarity and support and well-vetted/well-studied/well-developed talking points, and more credibility. MORE! I don't care who started it or how many started it! And it shouldn't make much difference to anyone else, either.

Elizabeth Warren cut through the crap from the first time I ever saw her, I think, on Rachel Maddow's show. She's brilliant and knows her stuff and explains it all clearly and simply and you can grasp it when she's teaching, and it makes sense! I think she's got a good point here - and that she DID have a SHIT-TON to do with the movement getting started, if only to educate enough people to get fired up about getting up off their asses and out of their living rooms and into the streets. Michael Moore, too. And Olbermann - they were both talking at length, and frequently, about the need for people to rise up and actually vote with their feet - get OUT THERE ON THE STREET AND PROTEST!

And as OWS gains more momentum, you'll start seeing all kinds of outsiders and poseurs trying to claim some credit. Unlike them, Elizabeth Warren has 10,000,000% credibility in making that claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
90. agreed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. Occupy did play that special comment to open
the occupation, so....I guess he could claim some credit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've said some really stupid shit in my life..
But I'm not sure if I've said anything that lacks self-awareness quite that much..

I really hope this is some kind of hack-job misquote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. It's the Daily Beast's interpretation. There is no such quote in either the truncated version
or the long version.

The headline is bullshit and, as usual, DUers are led by the nose by the right wing media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. The Daily Beast headline is clean, it's Business Insider. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
66. Look at the the title of your browser window when you click on the Daily Beast link.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/24/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street.html

Mine says this. "Elizabeth Warren: 'I created Occupy Wall Street' - Daily Beast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Ah, so it does.
They changed the title of the article, but forgot the <title> tag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #21
98. What she DID say is bad enough
She takes credit for the "intellectual foundation" of OWS which is nonsense. That "intellectual foundation" is common fucking sense and has been around forever if only politicians like her bothered to notice the common sense grievances of the people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. d'oh!


This'll float like a lead zeppelin... If true, Warren has just fucked up her campaign, real good-like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. The OP misrepresents Warren.
And nowhere in the article is there any quote where Warren takes credit for OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sibelian Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
80. She is quoted as taking credit for the "intellectual foundation" of the movement.

Is this true or false?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #80
89. The foundation actually is in Spain
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DianeK Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. I love Elizabeth Warren but...
I think if we were going to credit anyone with the intellectual foundation of this movement we need look no further than Bernie Sanders first speech he ever made..compare it to the last speech he ever made...he has been saying the same thing for the last 40 some years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evrstrong Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
85. I'd give it to Ralph Nader...
YES, Ralph Nader!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Exaggerated headline...Common practice corpmedia uses to force a controversy where there isn't one.
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 12:55 PM by blm
In recent years, Elizabeth Warren and groups working WITH her DID generate much of the research, data gathering, and intellectual analysis OWS uses as the basis of its case against Wall Street. We've been posting about Elizabeth Warren's work here at DU for some years now. Not hard to believe that other internet sites shared that same information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ecclesisastes: "Vanity, vanity, all is vanity". This is such bullshit, and
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 01:01 PM by coalition_unwilling
she should know better. If anything, Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, V.I. Lenin, Proudhon, Mao and Ho Chi Minh among others created the intellectual foundations much more so than Warren could ever dream of doing. What a fool. The source article from dailybeast is quoted correctly in Busines Insider. So unless Warren disavows the quote, she's erroneously taking credit for the intellectual foundations of OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. As usual, DUers are being led by the nose by the right wing media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Not true. Busienss Insider quotes an article from The Daily Beast
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 01:03 PM by coalition_unwilling
that, in turn, quotes Warren as taking credit for much of the intellectual foundations of OWS. There's no being led by the nose. Warren has stuck her foot in her mouth and needs to retract it ASAP.

Or am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. To compound things, you're misquoting the Daily Beast.
Words matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Quote from the Daily Beast:
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 01:07 PM by coalition_unwilling
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/10/24/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street.html

*********************

Quote from Business Insider:

http://www.businessinsider.com/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street-2011-10

*********************

The quotes match up exactly.

I never claimed to be quoting the Daily Beast, more like paraphrasing. i've gone back and edited my paraphrase to bring it more closely into alignment with the words she actually used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
65. When I click on the Daily Beast the title on the top of my browser says 'I created
Occupy Wall Street'

Funny that. It's quite a bit different than her claim of creating the intellectual foundation. Of course, that (and her support for OWS) are the only quotes that we get from the Daily Beast (which is a right wing publication). We have no clue what the question was. We do not know if that quote is in a larger context. All we get is a fake quote and a reply to a reporter that seems to be just floating in the air unattached to any context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. It's severely disappointing...
it'd be one thing if people were saying, 'oh great the media is going to twist her words like they did Gore's' but instead what I'm seeing is more of an auomatic acceptance that she said it.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. The headline is RW bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. No kidding....what a con job...folks...READ the article first...they made up the quote..
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. I tried to follow the link to the interview, and there was no interview.
Can someone please tell me how to access the interview? I must be missing something.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. It came from this article:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. But that's not an interview. It said : "Read the full interview here -"
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 01:11 PM by Zorra
But the link went to that opinion piece, not to an interview.

Is there a way to get to the actual interview?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
31. First off, that is not what she said.
“I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do,” she told Samuel Jacobs. “I support what they do.”

Second, she's right. All the shows that she went on the last few years and explained exactly what happened and is happening gave rise to people understanding that the deck is stacked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
38. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
39. The author, Zeke Miller, is a RW Tool, Wannabe 1%er, Can't-Get-A-Date, Puke-Encrusted Turd!


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. There we go.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #39
100. Suprising that this turd is being given credibility and "catapulted" on DU,
Eh?


You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.

Solidarity99!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
40. You know what is the worst thing about this whole thread?
THE IDIOTS THAT ARE READING THE LEAD--IN AND NOT READING THE REST OF THE POST....


WHY ARE SO MANY HERE BEING SO OBTUSE?

It says right in the OP that is not what she said, here is the quote: “I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do,” she told Samuel Jacobs. “I support what they do.”


WHERE DOES IT SAY THERE THAT SHE CREATED OWS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. The worst thing is that people who do read the story accept
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 01:13 PM by coalition_unwilling
at face value that Warren created much of the intellectual foundation for OWS. She did not and to claim she did comes off as vain and deluded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
94. Maybe this will be fixed in DU3 too?
IT SAYS SHE "CREATED OWS" IN THE OP'S HEADLINE. Isn't that enough for you?




:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:11 PM
Original message
RW Business Insider made that quote up; what she DID say is 100% TRUE.
Unrecced for the lie that she said she created OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. No. Warren DID NOT create much of the intellectual
foundation for OWS, her claims to have done so notwithstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Yes, she did. She was talking about these issues eons ago on PBS,
Frontline, elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. I guess we're going to have to debate the meanings of "create"
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 01:23 PM by coalition_unwilling
and "intellectual foundations." I'll grant that Warren discussed the issues and she deserves credit for so doing. But she DID NOT "create" the "intellectual foundations" (unless we're going to ignore Karl Marx, Keynes, V.I. Lenin, ad infinitum who all wrote and thought long before Warren was even a gleam in her parents' eyes).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #51
60. Sometimes, saying grandiose things is simply a matter of having a brainfart.
If she is later asked if her words were to be interpreted as meaning that we should be worshipping her as a Financial Goddess Supreme, she would explain better what she meant.

Anyway, I don't disagree with you that she is not to be considered an equal to Aristotle or Adam Smith, but I also think maybe you're splitting hairs about this particular quote. Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #51
74. From the Huffington Post we find out that she was referring specifically to the issue of
consumer debt. Not the movement.

"Warren also said that she supported the Occupy Wall Street protests. "I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do," she added, referring to her academic research on consumer debt. "

Someday, much like Al Gore inventing the internet we will be privy to the actual question she was asked and the context of her answer.

In the meantime. We continue to be led by the nose by the rightwing press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #74
84. I was writing without the benefit of the Huff Post. Given this new
contextualization of her quote (namely, the addition of the subordinate clause beginning with the word 'referring'), I believe I need to retract what I wrote about Warren's vanity and self-delusion. I apologize for needlessly inflaming this thread. In my defense, I could only rely upon the two sources presented at the time (Business Insider and Daily Beast), neither of which saw fit to mention this limiting condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #84
95. Thank you so much for that. Your reaction is why I've been so adament
about this issue. DUers, the left, Democrats, etc. need to step back and consider the source before levying judgment. Acorn, an organization slowly built by the efforts of hundreds of volunteers over decades by mostly poor people, was destroyed in a month by Brietbart's reporting and the rightwing's framing and liberals acceptance of that framing. Many DUers were quick to condemn based on rightwing propaganda alone.

It was heartbreaking.


I truly believe that our initial response should be to suspect and reserve judgment of ALL negative reporting of anyone who champions democratic ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #51
75. 2 Income Trap review
This is "the rare financial book that sidesteps accusations of individual wastefulness to focus on institutional changes," raved the Boston Globe.

Elisabeth Warren has been talking about making vast changes for a long long long time. Way before it was fashionable, way before most cared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #75
82. Did you read the book?
What were the vast changes she was proposing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. She basically was saying that famlies today
don't spend more on luxuries: vacations, tvs, etc but do spend more on basics: health care, energy, homes, and education. That they work longer hours with less benefits than families in the seventies and require two incomes while simultaneously leaving them more vulnerable to bankruptcy because there is no wiggle room. In the past if a one income family lost work the other parent could get a job to bridge the gap. Now losing one job can lead to bankruptcy. One medical emergency - bankruptcy. That younger generations were being burdened by so much debt that they were being forced out of the middle class unable to keep up.
She saw a need to lower the cost on necessities: education, healthcare, energy, home prices or at least bring them in line with salaries (or salaries in line with their costs) Also need for greater job security in order to support a healthy middle class.
She didn't talk about corruption in politics brought about by excessive lobbying, revolving door between political appointees and corporations and citizens' united. What she did do was recognize the effects of decades of undermining workers. There is a great talk she gave on youtube with graphs and such if you want me to look for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
42. MISREPRESENTATION in headline.
Kind of reminiscent of what they did to Al Gore. unrec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
48. GAWD I hate seeing DUers fall for RW bullshit...
All y'all who bought this nonsense need to do a self-realization reality check... pronto!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #48
71. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
52. A: She can certainly claim some credit for drawing attention to the plight of
average Americans having the deck stacked against them. And B: I don't care, doesn't change my hope that she becomes Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
53. I invented the knock knock joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
54. That is pathetic...the editors should be fired for misleading the country
oh wait...this is what passes as honest journalism. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
58. This is a two level issue. First level, business insider headlines with something she never said.
Level 2: what she actually said is arguably false. She certainly was an important supporter of the middle class. Did she create the intellectual foundations of the movenment. At a certain level, may be, but she is not the only one and there were people who contributed a lot more.

Does it matter? Not really? She is running against a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Thank you. You have stated the situation far more cleanly
than my pathetic efforts.

I am glad she's been raising the issues for as long as she has and I hope she wins her election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #58
73. She never claims to have created the intellectual foundations of the movement.
Fortunately, Huffington Post provides a tiny glimpse of her quote in context. She was referring to her research on consumer debt. So, what she was saying is that she created the intellectual foundations for addressing the issue of consumer debt.

"Warren also said that she supported the Occupy Wall Street protests. "I created much of the intellectual foundation for what they do," she added, referring to her academic research on consumer debt. "

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/25/elizabeth-warren-occupy-wall-street_n_1030974.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. Do you think that her reasearch on consumer debt is "much of the intellectual foundation for what
I would disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #79
92. there is a difference between much and majority. When you come to protcting consumers from banks
and other business then yes she is very right in her statement. If you think that protecting consumers from banks doesn't have much to do with the OSW movement then I would disagree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
62. Self delete.
Edited on Tue Oct-25-11 01:46 PM by sinkingfeeling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
63. Interestingly, they do not emphasize she was a Republican until the early 1990s.
I guess that would cut the argument she is a communist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
64. Too bad she didn't say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
68. I don't believe she said that. More like this is a right wing attempt to divide and conquer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
69. This is what happens when decent people run for office
Elizabeth Warren rocks as a person, and she would be a credit on the Senate, therefore she's going to be nit-picked to death. That's what happens when decent people run for office, they get nit-picked on things that don't matter.

As usual, the press picks anything they can to alienate a decent person's base. She can weather the storm though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
83. Why #Occupy Wall Street (video with Elizabeth Warren)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
88. Misrepresent much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-11 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
93. no, she didn't. sorry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cowpunk Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
97. Demand A Retraction! Zeke Miller at Business Insider made this up.
Edited on Wed Oct-26-11 10:43 AM by Cowpunk
I am amazed how many people here at DU fell for this already.

We need to fight back and get the fraudulent title of Zeke Miller's article changed, or this will indeed become a right-wing line of attack against Elizabeth Warren.

Zeke Warren's contact info:

Zeke Miller is a politics reporter at Business Insider.
Contact: e-mail: [email protected]
AIM: zekejmiller
Work Phone: (202) 527-9353
SMS: (516) 581-9301

The article can be read here.

Spelling edited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piratefish08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
99. unlike many repliers to this post, OWS protesters will actually read the article
before throwing Warren under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
102. they should embrace her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC