Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whatever happened to that NY DA who was going after Goldman Sachs, et. al.????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 02:57 PM
Original message
Whatever happened to that NY DA who was going after Goldman Sachs, et. al.????
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 03:05 PM by 99th_Monkey
Remember this? http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-06-02/news/29631706_1_goldman-sachs-manhattan-da-subpoena

Goldman Sachs hit with subpoena from Manhattan DA: Will Wall St. fat cats face jail for '08 crisis?
BY MELISSA GRACE AND HELEN KENNEDY
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
Thursday, June 02, 2011

Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance has a fat new target: Wall Street titan Goldman Sachs, which got hit with a subpoena into its actions right before the 2008 credit collapse.

The subpoena stems from a scathing 639-page Senate report accusing Goldman of deliberately selling toxic mortgage-backed securities to unsuspecting clients, knowing the housing market was about to crash.

"It's very serious," said a law enforcement source who noted Thursday that Vance's office is "throwing resources at it."


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THIS WAS 3-4 MONTHS AGO, AND I HAVEN'T HEARD BOO ABOUT IT SINCE THIS BROKE. ANYONE KNOW??

THIS SEEMS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT AND RELEVANT GIVEN WHAT'S GOING ON WITH OCCUPY WALL ST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Goldman had no hand in the 2008 crisis
They have no consumer business at all. Sure, Goldman sold crappy MBS to Abacus - but why cry for another fund?

Countrywide and Washington Mutual (plus 100s others) with their liar/NINJA Option ARM shitty mortgages were the root cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Right. So Goldman decieved another big fund and that fund never initiated action
against Goldman.

OK, fine.

Goldman was not out there pushing shitty mortgages on consumers. There were many others who did that.

http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/completelist/0,29569,1877351,00.html

(list of 25 people most to blame for financial crisis - no one from Goldman)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. So this is all made up stuff that never happened?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511

Keep defending a criminal corporation all you want. Defrauding clients is a crime, but spin away. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I acknowledge Goldman decieved another Big Fund.
But Goldman has no checking accounts, no mortgage origination, no credit cards, no consumer business at all.

You can get all teary-eyed about the unnamed Big Fund but I won't. They read the prospectus.

And they paid a $550 million fine - excellent! BP paid $20 billion - better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. They committed a crime and you defend them. Says a lot about
you imo but whatever. It is your prerogative to defend criminals blindly. I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. No one proved their "crime". No victim came forward. None at all.
When Elizabeth Warren's CFPB is finished it will have no impact on Goldman -- they have NO CONSUMER BUSINESS.

Have you ever seen a Goldman bank branch? Of course not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Your statement is so weak. Who says you have to be a bank to
commit a crime? That's all you got!??! They defrauded their clients! Over and over! What does that mean to you? Right, nothing. Glad you have nothing to do with big biz...we need honest people in charge - not those that look the other way when a favored company commits fraud. Which is against the law...sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. Who needs proof these days?
Nor charges. Just drop a bomb on them and proclaim it a great day in the war on crime.

Or does that approach only apply to flesh and blood persons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. You know, the good folks at KOS may have been on to something...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I learned something today, it ain't a crime if you ain't a bank!
People get stuck on the bankster ploy way to often imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Do you know anything about civil law? Why doesn't the "victim" sue Goldman?
I'll tell you why because I read the prospectus. They have no chance of winning. The warning was writ large "the underlying mortgages could fail" (I am paraphrasing).

Congress won $550 million on the politics only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. They will in time and GFS is going down for criminal activity.
Doesn't matter if you read the source document, you don't seem to care about justice. Shrill for GS all you want to...it just seems kinda pathetic to do on a message board. If you read further down in this thread you will see people are already taking action against GS. Why don't you go argue with them about your nonsensical love for GS? I really don't care anymore, you disgust me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. 7-8 years from now you will still be howling about why
"Goldman never got beheaded" like Rosanne is doing.

I offer you a legal explanation and you cover your ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. You posted that fraud is okay as long as it is a company you
approve of. That is fine, you say crime is okay in your book. Roger, that is your problem. Me, I like it when criminals get punished for their wrongdoings...you not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. you're lying - I don't use the term "fraud".
It has a specific legal meaning.

I used "deceit".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Nice weasel words.
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 05:32 PM by Rex
:eyes:

Fraud is intentional deception...not that you care.

And you used the word 'deceived' not 'deceit'...can you get anymore disingenuous in your posting? I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. They did become a bank holding company..
in order to partake in government largesse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red dog 1 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Goldman Sachs did have a hand in the crisis that's brewing today in Greece
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 04:35 PM by red dog 1
Michael Bass's latest book, "Boomerang: The Meltdown Tour", tells the stories of the fiscal restlessness in both Europe and the U.S. that led to the current debt crisis.
"In Greece", he says, "the government initially disguised the true state of it's finances with the help of U.S. bankers.
Goldman Sachs, for example, did off-market currency trades with the government of Greece.
Those trades enabled the Greek government to book upfront a big profit, but down the road the Greek government would have to repay Goldman Sachs quite a bit", Lewis says. "So Goldman Sachs lent the government money without saying that's what they were doing...They helped the Greek Government rig it's books so that they looked acceptable to the European Union so they'd be admitted to the euro-zone"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Even so, the poster already admits he doesn't care if they committed
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 04:28 PM by Rex
a crime or not...so there is no point in mentioning facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I did not say that - there is no crime proven. Period. n/t
please link to a CONVICTION - if you know what that term means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Yes you did, you said fraud is a okay in your book.
Do you know what the term fraud means? I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. agree 100% - Greece got their money's worth from Goldman
"rig its books" is good enough.

Let the EU sort that out. Its not germane in the US. I predict that the EU will do nothing though since they would have to admit they were readily duped by Greece in their haste to form the EU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
red dog 1 Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. Correction to previous post.
In my previous post I referred to Michael Bass's latest book, "Boomerang The Meltdown Tour"
It should read Michael Lewis's latest book, "Boomerang: The Meltdown Tour"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. They were appointed another cabinet seat.
GFS is untouchable. Just like JP Morgan. Some corporations are so far above the law, it attracts unwanted attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. No doubt
but geesh, it sure happened quietly, what happened to Mr. Vance? an unfortunate fall from his office window,
auto or plane crash? I never heard. Or maybe he was quietly bought off? or just scared off, what with
all that "could happen" to his wife, kids or whever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Well if you look at this WSJ page, he has had nothing to do with
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/v/cyrus_r_vance_jr/index.html

any wall street arrests or procecutions so...I dunno, nobody wants to report bad news about their paymasters? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. From that write-up, it looks like Mr. Vance
was quite busy last June with the Strauss-Khan fiasco.

But that doesn't mean his office isn't also going after Goldman Sachs, as reported in the OP link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. No, but you would think the WSJ would report on such activity.
Naw I am kidding...Rupert Murdoch owns the WSJ and would never let a fellow paymaster get burned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. ;-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Scrubbed? Google News search for
"Goldman Sachs" "Cy Vance"
(using quotes)

0 results

Scrubbed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. good question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Uhhh... He retired.
Meanwhile, When he was AG, Spitzer was going after Wall St. left and right, which is why the RepubliCONs had him framed. Had Spitzer not been framed, these guys might be in jail. The new AG, Schneiderman will go after them, in due time. He's a good man.
Cuomo is a neo-progressive, from the same school as Obama. More like one of the go along, get along gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Do you mean Cy Vance retired? or who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. No, not Vance, Morgenthau.
Who was DA for 34 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. My OP question was about Cy Vance, who in June '11 announced he was
going after Goldman Sachs. Did you even read the op?

MY QUESTION -- TO REPEAT IT -- IS WHAT HAPPENED TO THIS
SUPPOSED INVESTIGATION, SINCE IT'S SUPPOSEDLY BEEN GOING ON NOW
FOR 3-4 MONTHS. DO YOU KNOW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Are you talking about Eric Schneiderman? He's still prosecuting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Did you read the article?
from very first line of the article "Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance has a fat new target..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I saw that I was letting you know that the NY DA is still very involved.
I never heard of that person before you posted the link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. But if Geitner does what he did to Spitzer, or threatens to
we'll see how fast he gets off the case!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I feel bad for Schneiderman but I hope he stays strong. He's going to piss everyone off
rightfully so. I almost worry for his safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Only "almost"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Seems To Still Be In Action, Sir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. COOL. Great to hear.
Finally, someone actually answers my question. Huge thanks.

I wonder is there's a way to link this investigation -- which as we see,
is happening VERY quietly, suspiciously so for my taste -- with the Occupy
Wall St. action, in signs posters, etc. to explicitly support and bring
much more attention to these investigations/prosecutions, as a way of
protecting people like Mr. Vance with the light of day all over these
proceedings.

You have any thoughts on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Thanks!
That was what I was looking for! Once again The Magistrate delivers the goods. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. it's possible you have Vance mixed up with the State AG of New York Eric T. Schneiderman
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/224534/20111004/eric-schneiderman-elizabeth-warren.htm

In August, Schneiderman tried to block court approval of an $8.5 billion agreement between Bank of America and Bank of New York Mellon to settle claims over mortgage-backed securities. Instead of bashing the banks from a bully pulpit during a press conference, he had his court filing do the talking for him.

In it, Schneiderman called the $8.5 billion settlement figure a "fraction of the losses suffered" by investors and accused Bank of New York Mellon of misleading investors in securitizing mortgages.

Though Bank of New York Mellon criticized Schneiderman's bid to intervene in its settlement, it took notice of his legal ingenuity. "There is no precedent for such an intervention" or for Schneiderman's legal theory in bringing the action, the bank said in a court filing.

Schneiderman also opposed a deal to provide banks immunity from civil action if a settlement over poor foreclosure practices with 50 state attorneys general is signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. No, I mean exactly who I said, Cy Vance, Manhatten DA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. ok, in that case, NOTHING has happened, Goldman Sachs has not responded
and no indictments have been issued, no news items since June 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
51. I think some confusion was due to my typing "NY DA" in OP, instead of Manhatten DA
sorry ...

actually someone did post some more recent news on this however,
turns out Mr. Vance's investigation is not only "ongoing" but is
also expanding & widening in scope.


see it here: http://www.businessinsider.com/manhattan-da-widens-probe-of-goldman-sachs-issuing-more-subpoenas-in-recent-weeks-2011-9?comments=all#comment-4e6800b669bedd362f000060#ixzz1ZqZMZf3a

GREAT NEWS indeed!! .. but it seems to be going on in some airtight soundproof container somewhere.

Hope someone has Mr. Vance's back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. good to know NY has two crusading prosecutors interested in reining in WS n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Yes, yes, and hopefully they are cooperating w/ one another in the investigation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. You can find more if you search under "Cyrus Vance"
I suppose he prefers to be called Cy so as not to be confused with his father, who was Jimmy Carter's Secretary of State.

That being said, though, not much seems to have happened since June.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Actually, someone did answer my question,
finding that the investigation is indeed on going and widening. See it here:
http://www.businessinsider.com/manhattan-da-widens-probe-of-goldman-sachs-issuing-more-subpoenas-in-recent-weeks-2011-9?comments=all#comment-4e6800b669bedd362f000060#ixzz1ZqZMZf3a


I'm wanting to connect the dots here with this investigation and the current Occupation on Wall St.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC