|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:01 PM Original message |
Today’s Friday Afternoon Challenge: “That Looks Familiar, Part II” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Angry Dragon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. #6 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. artists? who did which? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
broiles (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Goya nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. this one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alsame (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Ooooh, I know one! Number 3 is Julianne Moore photographed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That's got to be based on Toulouse Lautrec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. not lautrec... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. I was thinking Lautrec too, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Indeed, see below! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. I thought the original was Klimt (spelling?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. He and Moore did a re-do of a Klimt but this isn't it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
40. I think the confusion is because Moore looks like a Klimt painting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Also, she does with the Klimt that was also done in this shoot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. Here goes nothing: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. good spotting...keep on goin' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canetoad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
6. Number 5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. non. Although I see the resemblance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seshers (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
10. #3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. hey, welcome to DU, seshers! I see we have another art lover in our midst! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seshers (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Welcome? I've been here for years... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Nice about your mom! I love these stories about how folks knew the art.! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. And the original... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. thanks, pinboy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinboy3niner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. A little slow...apparently :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
11. #4, Rouen Monet, naturally!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. and the re-do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. wrong place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. You know, that was not the one I had read was this artist's "original." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. 5 Dali and Botticelli? (guessing) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. It is isn't Picasso. See my post above about Botticelli... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Hey, good on Dali....now for the original that precedes Botticelli... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. damn everybody did a version of the three graces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 06:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Choose... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
30. #5 makes me think of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Yep. Which one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. well, the figures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
horseshoecrab (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
31. #1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
horseshoecrab (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 05:10 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. btw . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 05:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Do you have a resource online about that? I know of course about the reference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
horseshoecrab (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 05:37 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Here are a couple of refs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 06:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I didn't find it on your second connection....where is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
horseshoecrab (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #36 |
44. correction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 08:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. It is interesting. I am just wondering if the cinematographer didn't do this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Permanut (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
35. Not an art expert, but number 2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 06:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
41. Interesting, because it IS a modern artist who did it,, so it is not,obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
37. OK, so we need the artist who did #2 original, #4 the re-do and #6 the "not the first".. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. Who did #2 the re-do above? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
46. #4 re-do = Roy Lichtenstein. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 07:11 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Excellent! I just saw the Monet/Lichtenstein exhibit at the MFA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC