Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

EXCLUSIVE: Regulator Says Murdoch Oil Shale Company Must Fix Faulty Wells

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 07:01 AM
Original message
EXCLUSIVE: Regulator Says Murdoch Oil Shale Company Must Fix Faulty Wells

September 02, 2011 4:43 pm ET by Sarah Pavlus

The state of Colorado says it will require American Shale Oil, LLC, -- a company backed by Rupert Murdoch and Dick Cheney -- to fix several poorly cemented wells that, according to the state, appear to be endangering ground water in western Colorado.

Halliburton -- the oil and gas giant once headed by Cheney -- conducted the cementing and cement evaluation of the wells and rated several as having "poor" cement bonds in certain segments, according to a memo that American Shale Oil (AMSO) submitted to state and federal regulators in late July.

In the July 26 memo, AMSO claimed the poor cementing in its wells "poses little threat" to groundwater resources in the Piceance Basin on Colorado's Western Slope, where the company is leasing federal land to pursue oil shale research and development.

But the state disagrees. When contacted about the AMSO memo, Steve Shuey, a Senior Environmental Protection Specialist for the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DRMS), told Media Matters in a statement that the cementing fell short of the plans filed by the company and it "appears to be inadequate to protect" the region's aquifers. Shuey said the state would require AMSO to fix the cementing:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice find, thanks. Glad Colorado stayed blue.
My vote actually mattered, too (only won by a few thousand votes in 2010, against a far right wing psychopath who was drooling over the prospects of oil shale exploitation), love it when that happens.

You can bet if that psychopath won we'd have thousands of oil shale exploration projects popping up everywhere, groundwater be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Murdoch and Cheney, partners in pollution.

Oil shale development has long enticed investors and those seeking a route to energy independence, but no company has yet proven a way to make the process both commercially viable and environmentally sound.

(end snip)

I am overwhelmed by the memory here of Karl Rove shortly after the 2010 elections about fracking:

"Climate is gone," said Rove, the keynote speaker on the opening day of a two-day shale-gas conference sponsored by Hart Energy Publishing L.L.P. And Rove told the trade show, "I don't think you need to worry" the new Congress will consider proposed legislation to put the controversial practice of hydraulic fracturing under federal rather than state regulation. The procedure, known as "fracking," is responsible for the dramatic growth of shale-gas drilling in formations such as Pennsylvania's vast Marcellus Shale.

emphasis is mine

Well, KKKarl, climate may not gone in Colorado. Too bad you can't appeal to O to call of those 'job killing' regulators, heh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Only the oil industry would consider "poorly cemented wells" acceptable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 16th 2018, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC