Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Dean: "Only Murdoch is suggesting scandal will remain in UK & he's not most reliable source"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:08 AM
Original message
John Dean: "Only Murdoch is suggesting scandal will remain in UK & he's not most reliable source"
Edited on Sat Aug-13-11 10:09 AM by kpete
John Dean
The Guardian, Fri 12 Aug 2011 21.00 BST

For all you need to know about Rupert Murdoch, look at his lawyers
As Nixon's counsel during Watergate, I can tell from the cost of News Corp's legal team the scandal will not be contained long


In addition to Arnold & Porter, Klein and Dinh retained another top Washington law firm, Williams & Connolly, and the firm's highly skilled criminal defence attorney, Brendan Sullivan, to assist with the criminal investigation in the US. Klein and Dinh retained Mark Mendelsohn, who until recently had been the deputy chief, fraud section, criminal division, of the US department of justice, and understands the department's thinking about prosecuting under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (which prohibits American businesses from bribing foreigners to assist their business, and appears applicable to some of the allegations against News Corp).

..............

Klein and Dinh surely now know the full extent of their problems. If they could state that no person remaining in the News Corp organisation, or the corporation itself, was involved in any criminal misconduct, there would be no reason for them to remain silent. Such a statement would largely end the story. The fact that the lawyers have absolved no one suggests to me that they have discovered potentially serious problems. Only Murdoch is suggesting the scandal will remain in the UK, and he is not the most reliable source.


...........

If the problems are half as serious as the level of legal talent retained suggests, I would not be surprised if News Corp co-operates with the prosecutors to get this matter behind the organisation. Rupert might throw his son James to the wolves. If evidence of wrongdoing by senior figures is found, the lawyers can defend it while requiring the government to prove its case, but they cannot assist in a cover up – a reality I learned the hard way. Rather they must withdraw from representation. And if that happens, we will all know they are fleeing a sinking ship.



http://m.guardian.co.uk/ms/p/gnm/op/scFMj_TExtSNCktbR6AcaqQ/view.m?id=15&gid=commentisfree/2011/aug/12/rupert-murdoch-lawyers-watergate-news-corp&cat=commentisfree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Murder Doc has so many powerful people in his pocket it may be a struggle to
Edited on Sat Aug-13-11 10:14 AM by Lint Head
prove he did illegal deeds in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Sir, Republicon propagandists are not potted plants." - Brendan Sullivan *R)
Edited on Sat Aug-13-11 10:18 AM by SpiralHawk
"They are much more like genetically mutant, chem-soaked, fungicide infested toxic weeds."

- Brendan Sullivan (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sullivan - defender of Traitors -- should aspire to Potted Plantery. As if...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC