Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

S&P Cites Tea Party’s, ‘Political Brinkmanship,’ in Downgrading U.S. Rating

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Dad Infinitum Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 04:58 PM
Original message
S&P Cites Tea Party’s, ‘Political Brinkmanship,’ in Downgrading U.S. Rating
Jon Ponder | Aug. 6, 2011

In explaining why it was lowering the U.S. credit rating late on Friday, Standard & Poor’s singled out tea party obstructionism on the economy:

“The political brinkmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective and less predictable than what we previously believed,” said S&P, one of three leading credit rating agencies.

“The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy.”

“Brinkmanship” is putting it politely, of course. A better description is economic terrorism or political extortion.

...

Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case scenario include trend real GDP growth of 3 percent and consumer price inflation near 2 percent annually over the decade.

For weeks in the lead up to the Aug. 2 deadline for raising the debt ceiling, tea partyists in Congress made it clear that if they did not get their way — if the deal was based entire only on cuts to programs and if it were to include new revenue of any sort — they would vote against the deal and force the United States into default.

Worse, these tea baggers flatly denied that putting the government into default would have any negative consequences.

http://www.pensitoreview.com/2011/08/06/sp-cites-tea-partys-extortion-politics-in-credit-rating-downgrade/">More



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I will CONSTANTLY K&R any threads blaming the downgrade on the Tea-Potty
Because the country could always use more truthiness!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes. Thanks
Has been posted elsewhere; needs broad distribution.

However S+P didn't say 'Tea Party,' but rather 'repugs,' broader and even more devastating, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC