Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Capitalism at the Guillotine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 07:40 AM
Original message
Capitalism at the Guillotine
http://counterpunch.org/hunziker08052011.html

Hard times always bring to surface questions about the sanctity and the viability of an economic system. The Ancien Régime, established in France from the 15th through the 18th centuries, failed when hard times hit because too many people felt the economic system’s sanctity and viability were skewed in favor of too few people. Queen Marie Antoinette may not have actually said, “Let them eat cake,” but this historical bit of triviality did not stop Henri Sanson from taking off her head before a crowd numbering tens of thousands; on the scaffold she accidentally stepped on his foot, and her last words were: “Monsieur, I ask your pardon. I did not do it on purpose.”

On June 21, 1791 the king, queen, and their attendants fled their Paris residences, whisked away in carriages, as masses of hungry protestors roamed the streets. The forewarnings were there years beforehand. On August 20, 1986, Finance Minister Calonne informed Louis that the royal finances were insolvent. Hard times hit. Six months later the First Assembly of Notables met, demonstrating resistance to imposition of taxes and fiscal reforms. It was nearly three years later April 27th, 1789 when the Reveillon Riot in Paris, caused by low wages and food shortages, led to about 25 deaths by troops. The Storming of the Bastille occurred July 14th and on July 17 the beginning of the Great Fear took command of the streets as the peasantry revolted against the economic system of the day. Amid a number of urban disturbances and revolts, members of the aristocracy, holding onto their heads, fled Paris to become émigrés.

History shows it does not matter whether an economic system is based upon feudalism or capitalism or socialism, or any ism. When it fails to accommodate the masses, the masses force change. Is capitalism the answer to, or the cause of, economic failure today? Stalwarts of capitalism like the United States, the UK, Italy, Spain, France, and Portugal have already had their turn at providing the answers and more questions than answers have now arisen. Are the tenets of capitalism, i.e., private property, competition, market-based, economic freedom, consumer sovereignty, and laissez faire today’s equivalent of the Ancien Régime circa 18th century? The answer is: There are ominous signs the masses are once again seeking change; after all, the president of the United States was recently elected on an amorphous promise of “change.” People are searching for it, and the operative question is: Why, if not for a failed economic system?

There should be little doubt that the 2008 financial meltdown influenced voters to vote for change in November 2008. The citizenry witnessed, live on the news and on Wall Street and in home ownership, the withering of capitalism, and as of today, every American knows the name Goldman Sachs, the catchword for failed policies for the republic at large but the savior of the aristocratic few. The question remains: Are the masses taking to the streets and where and why and how does capitalism play a role?

More at the link ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. My new business plan...
I'm opening a Guillotine manufacturing business...I'll sell Guillotine's retail and eliminate the wholesalers...I'll call my business Lafarge Guillotines....when the teanderthals finally turn on the corporate plutocrats, I'll make millions...MILLIONS I tells ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. We at "Pitchforks 'R' Us" would like to talk to you about distribution rights.
I know you prefer to do in-house retailing, but have you considered a partnership arrangement? Our stores already have sections set up for pitchforks, torches, and slow-cookers and barbecues (including our exclusive brand of rubs, marinades, and sauces). We can easily set up a new section for guillotines, and would be proud to include the Lafarge brand exclusively.

Think about it. We're talking some BIG BUCKS here!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Interesting proposal....
we may be willing to consider a protected territory if we can come to terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. If I may suggest you guys plant a demo-boutique tent on the corner of
E St. NW and 14th St. NW ASAP... ( http://october2011.org/freedomplaza )

Although it is meant to be a peaceful movement, but hey, ya nevah no! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent post
Maybe the real revolution will begin when the masses in America wake up. The fundamental difference between the US and France is that the US had an anti-colonial revolution and not a fundamental overthrow of the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fivepennies Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. August 20, 1986
is obviously a typo.

But what I've always wanted to know is who had been financing France's royalty and Calonne prior to 1787, where had the government been getting its funding, who downgraded them and why did they shut off the money supply? Did that group of financiers want a revolution?

Its kind of funny that when people get mad, they always want the heads of state to roll because they're visible and available, but the masses can't ever seem to get to the guys behind the curtain who really control the economy and therefore the actions of the kings/queens that inevitably cause the peasants to go hungry.

And the successors to the now headless heads of state never seem to learn the lesson either until its too late.

Even Napoleon said: The hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC