Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader is on Olbermann talking about an Obama primary challenge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ncpmd Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:39 PM
Original message
Nader is on Olbermann talking about an Obama primary challenge
He talked about an initiative being launched in the next couple of days where 100 progressive leaders are being asked to join in an effort leading to a progressive primary challenger against Obama. BUT, he stressed TWICE that the goal of the initiative is NOT TO actually try to BEAT HIM in the primary but just to get progressive issues discussed and debated during the primary.

I want a FOR REAL progressive candidate...this "pretend" candidate strategy feels like another slap in the face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go away, Ralph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
popsicle ricky Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. What does Ralph say that you disagree with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. I can't speak for Ocelot but Nader getting into the race
race threatens to split the Dem vote. The split, in addition to newly legislated voter ID requirements in some states may guarantee that we are stuck with another repuke.

BTW, welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
67. That's easy
Ralph is saying to put away your Obama Idol and Incense Kits and start actually working toward pulling the Democrats back from the Right.

I'm too poor to ever have gotten the Obama Idol and Incense Kit, so clearly, I'm just a traitor to the cause and NEVER REALLY LOVED HIM!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
77. That there is NO difference between Obama and the tea-baggers....
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 03:11 PM by BlueDemKev
...just like there was NO difference between Gore and Bush!


FLORIDA 2000

Bush 2,912,790 votes
Gore 2,912,253 votes
Nader 97,488 votes

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
57. Ralph can go take a hike. The bastard won't show his financials.
He talks out of both sides of his ass. Show your porfolio, you slagger or go jump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #57
63. The size of his ego has always surprised me
-- that and his substantial following here on DU. Not sure what he adds to the political discourse other than just another option on the ballot - which has NOT worked to anyone's benefit so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
51. Let a rash in the nether regions, Ralph does not go away without strong
medication. That medication is ignoring that damned fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is Nader a registered Democrat?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
78. No, he's a registered Naderite
It's all about "me, myself, and I." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah....he did so well the last time.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Certainly did well getting lots of money from Republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nader is not and has not been a Democrat for many years
So he really has no standing to decide who the party nominates for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. He needs a progressive CONGRESS
Ralph is pissing up a tree. Blue Dogs killed 2009/10 legislation. Had we had a progressive congress, we would have seen more progressive legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
69. The filibuster killed 2009/10 legislation
The House passed tons of progressive legislation (Health INSURANCE, not "care", reform not withstanding).

The inability to get even ONE "moderate Republican" (Paging Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins) to split with their party on anything while the conservative Democrats would split from the Democratic Party is why close to 450 pieces of progressive legislation died in the Senate. So what did Harry Reid do? Nothing.

Ultimately, the problem is that we don't have a senator from Louisiana, we have a senator from Exxon, another from Haliburton, another from Goldman Sachs, another from United Healthcare. Unless and until we can educate our fellow Americans on propaganda techniques, it will be very easy for money to buy elections.

Oh, and someone in the Democratic Party seriously needs to work on the bumper sticker marketing. Let's start with "tax fairness" and work from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. The same Ralph Nader who elected George W Bush?
That worked well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Florida and the SC elected Bush. It wasn't Nader's fault. There were several other left leaning
candidates on the Fl ballot who had more than enough votes to put Gore over the top. Centrists just like to scapegoat Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:01 PM
Original message
dupe, again
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 08:02 PM by elocs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. So, please explain how all of those votes that went to Nader in Florida helped Gore?
:shrug:

Conspiracies are always more alluring than individual choices. Just like every lost election that was close had to be stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
45. You're working under a false assumption. Do you think the people who voted for Nader would of voted
for Gore if Nader's name was not on the ballot?

There were three other candidates on the Fl ballot who were just as left leaning as Nader and received less votes than Nader, but more than the difference between Gore and Bush.

The other argument to be made is that Gore didn't really care enough about the liberal agenda to campaign for their votes.

And let's be honest, we really don't know who would of won if the recount were to have continued. Bush still might of won, but Gore still had a shot. It was the SC who stopped the count and allowed Bush to be certified the winner of FL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:31 PM
Original message
Another dupe that showed up as a response to the OP rather than a post. n/t
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 09:32 PM by elocs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. Yes, I assume that & I believe it is a logical assumption.
It was stupid to vote for Nader in a battleground state such as Florida. If he wasn't on the battle I think it is a logical assumption that more of those votes would have gone to Gore than Bush.

The big meme then, as now, was that there was no difference between Democrats and Republicans, Gore and Bush.

Bottom line: those who voted for Nader in Florida did not in any way help Gore, but Bush was thankful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. How about all those Democrats who voted for Bush?
Nader had nothing to do with the Felonious Five deciding that election. He ran a legal and fair campaign, THEY committed treason, and you're letting them off the hook for what they did??? No wonder we never get any justice in this country. People are so locked into their personal grievances they are willing to ignore even a major crime like the theft of the 2000 election by the USSC. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
71. I disagree. I think those that voted for Nader would have still voted for a
3rd party candidate. You believe that Nader pulled votes from Gore, but I believe the reality is that Nader pulled votes from other 3rd party candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
80. Nader WAS NOT The Problem In Florida... I Live Here & It Was A Fiasco!
There was MUCH MORE to 2000 than Nader! I've had this conversation so many times, so won't bother to dissect it again. Yes, Nader got votes... but really it goes much deeper and Nader isn't here now and Florida is STILL having problems.

I would like to know HOW Rick Scott became Governor! It wasn't because Nader had anything to do with it. The BUSHIES' are still here in this state... make no mistake about it! Jebby is hiding in the BUSHES still!

BET ON IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Gore won the 2000 election. The SC gave it to George Bush.
The rewriting of history is simply stunning at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Yup. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
53. Are mites blind? Does the SC make them see? Is Up Down and Down Up? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. The Supreme Court elected bu$h.
There were only nine votes that mattered in the Supposed Election of 2000. You Nader haters need to give it up and move on for the good of the country.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
60. Gore/Lieberman elected Bush by not dropping out of the race when a real liberal ran. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
74. Bush wasn't elected., duh. n/t
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fuck Nader. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
popsicle ricky Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Really could live without this. May forego KO tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a fuckin' idiot. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. I went to Larry O during that segment.
Thanks for letting me know I made a good choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Damn, what IS the life expectancy of a narcissistic shithead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. .
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Aw Jeez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nader did more for the people of the US than Obama ever did.
Thank him for the creation of OSHA (the Occupational Safety and Health Administration), the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), and the Consumer Product Safety Administration? And did you know that Nader was instrumental in the adoption of the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Freedom of Information Act, the Wholesome Meat Act, and the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act? (Indeed, it was Ralph Nader who maneuvered the auto industry into making airbags available on American cars.) However, more than anything else, Nader is responsible for a wholesale shift in contemporary attitudes toward consumer rights, public safety, humane business practices, and open government.

I'm certain his focus in life was never to put bankers and Standard & Poor's in their happy place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I agree. But I think he should stick to activism and stay out
of presidential politics. He hasn't done anything constructive in recent memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
79. I love the "what have you done for me lately" crowd.
Get off your ass and do it yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
81. Um, I don't care if he does anything "for me" or not.
I just want him to stay the fuck out of presidential elections. By the way, other than those, what HAS he done lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. If there are cuts to the Social Safety Net Programs, Nader
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 07:57 PM by sabrina 1
won't be the only one looking for a primary challenger, and it will not be a pretend effort either.

And I agree, Nader has done a lot for the American people. He will be remembered for what he did, despite the screeching of the small minority who don't want to hear the truth. The more I see how things work, the more I know how correct he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. If only he'd stuck to that and not split votes in 2000. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
70. That's absolutely the key point.
It's amazing that Nader is ONLY NOW noticing that we have this thing called the "primary" for choosing a major party's candidates.

If Nader had run in the Democratic primaries in 2000, he probably wouldn't have become President (though it's easier to see him being inaugurated via that route than as the Green Party candidate). He would, however, have been in televised debates about the issues, giving him a great platform for spreading his ideas to people who otherwise wouldn't (and didn't) hear them. He would have created a huge cadre of progressives who were versed in Democratic Party internal organization and procedures. He would have gotten more votes, including mine.

And, of course, there wouldn't have been a hopeless third-party candidacy to serve as one of the factors that resulted in the Bush administration. (Naderites, please note the boldfaced phrase. It's quite possible that Gore would have become President if Katherine Harris hadn't illegally disenfranchised 50,000 voters, or if Gore had picked Kerry as his running mate, or if the Supreme Court had decided honestly. None of that proves that Nader's decision had no effect. An event can having multiple causes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adhd_what_huh Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. RN can suck my ass!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. He's like a cicada
Every four years or so........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. STFU, Ralph. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Run! Ralph! Run!
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 08:02 PM by Tarheel_Dem
:rofl:

ps: The only good news is that he'll be seen by about 20 households. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. And in this corner we have "Harold Stassen" Nader, Nader.
With apologies to Stassen. Although before all is eventually said and done he may have to arm wrestle Kucinich for that title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. Fuck off...
now is not the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
white_wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
30. I wonder how many people will throw Keith under the bus now
for having the nerve to let Nader on his show. Heaven forbid real progressive ideas are discussed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Why? It was Shuster, and Nader, frankly, was nearly Falstaffian....
It was well-needed comic relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
66 dmhlt Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nader - Costing Progressives One Election Not Enough for You?
Go Fuck Yourself, Nader!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #32
76. Oh, but didn't you know.....
...that there is NO DIFFERENCE between Obama and the Tea Party?? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. Oooh
"he stressed TWICE that the goal of the initiative is NOT TO actually try to BEAT HIM in the primary "

...a play primary. What a great strategy: We're so going to primary him, but we don't really mean it!!!!

Obligatory: Fuck Nader!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. I know, you figure by now EVERYONE would be clued into the stupidity that is Ralph Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. We need a real progressive to be talking about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
37. Nader represents both an insignificant leftist fringe and powerful leftistl threat.
Simultaneously. At least according to the Third Way, New Democrat, apologists for the establishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. The Media gives Nader more significance than he'd have otherwise, since they love helping Rep's win-
just like Nader does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. Shove off, Ralph.
Scram. Be gone. You've done enough damage already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. Obama is allowing Nader to make sense
Obama's conservative centrist positions have created a vacuum. I'm okay with primarying this President if he continues to act not like a liberal, but like George W. Bush 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
43. Please can we let Ralph blah, blah, blah, blah Nader go away. He is so boring and we have him to
thank for Bush. Please will he just shut up for once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #43
62. Bush was Gore's fault. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. Yawn
:boring: :boring: :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
47. What the fuck does he care?
I thought there was no difference between Democrats and Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
48. Nader is as responsible for the mess we have today as anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
49. I agree - The goal should be to beat him, so that Americans have the opportunity to vote for
a president who will represent them.

Getting progressive issues on the table would be a good effect of a serious primary challenge, but beating him would be far better. We don't just want progressive issues discussed and debated. We want them enacted into law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
50. So Nader wants to weaken the Democratic nominee
How surprising. Fuck Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Posers like Nader are big at Firedog Lake, and of late unfortunately, DU. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #55
66. What is dividing us is neither of those.
It's two parties pushing laissez faire economics with no safety net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
54. I'm glad he's thinking in terms of a primary
vs. the general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
59. Good
We need more voices Than 'Republican', and 'sucks just a little bit less than republican'.

I wish it was'nt that asshole, Nader, but SOMEONE has to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
61. Fine, Where's the national voter database? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
64. Agree.
The primaries (where we get a "choice" of voting for Corporate Whore A or Corporate Whore B), are already a dog-and-pony show, enough already. I would LOVE to see a real progressive primary challenger. And to the Cheer Squad: Viva Democracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
65. Ralph's looking for another hefty paycheck from the RNC...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
68. Fuck Ralph Nader...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
72. LOL
Pavlov's dogs have nothing on Nader-hating DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomb Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
73. If you were in the booth and had no names, just a candidates position - Which Lever would you pull?
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueDemKev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
75. Hey Ralph.....GET LOST!!!!!!!!!!!!
You're the main reason this country is in the mess it is today!!! If you had backed Al Gore 11 years ago, Bush and the right-wing retards never would have destroyed this country during the '00s and you probably would have had a seat in the White House Cabinet!!!

Take your threats Ralph, and stick 'em where the sun doesn't shine!!!!

:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: :mad: :mad: :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
82. He should just stfu.
15 minutes are over, fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
83. The objective should be to win but a minimum would be to present alternative solutions
and distance at least some of the party from some version of corporate enabling Republicanism. Essentially the mid 90's Republicans on balance but a spectrum from Rockefeller to Dole to Reagan in prevailing views of those running the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC