Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Chris Murphy (D-CT) has introduced a bill in the House that will institute ethics rules to oversee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:14 PM
Original message
"Chris Murphy (D-CT) has introduced a bill in the House that will institute ethics rules to oversee
the conduct of Supreme Court justices and protect their integrity from doubt."

"The corrupting influence of special interests has infected most of our government, and we've seen the results: Wall Street ran wild, climate change is being ignored, and pay-to-play politics have started to dominate our Congress.

But there is one body that is supposed to rise above all of that: the Supreme Court. Granted, I have been critical about many of the Court's recent opinions -- and I'm troubled by how many of their recent rulings tip the scale in favor of wealthy interests. But much of America's trust in our system of government rests on the fundamental fairness of the highest court in the land. And we must make sure it lives up to that trust.

However, several recent stories about the conduct of our Supreme Court justices, including Justice Clarence Thomas, threaten that perception. Fortunately, Representative Chris Murphy (D-CT) has introduced a bill in the House that will institute ethics rules to oversee the conduct of Supreme Court justices and protect their integrity from doubt. It's great legislation, but someone needs to sponsor it in the Senate to give it a chance.

Urge your senator to step up and sponsor Rep. Murphy's Supreme Court ethics bill in the Senate. Click here to use our easy online call tool to get connected directly to your senator's office."

P.S. Progressives United will always fight corruption in elections and in government, but as we saw with the Supreme Court's horrible ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the problem often comes from the top. So please take a minute, click here to use our easy online call tool, and urge your senator to sponsor this important Supreme Court ethics bill.

I know this has been out for a while but I wanted to remind others to contact their Senators.. This info. Came to me via Russ Feingolds Progressive United org... If you want more info. on this bill contact this org...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Introduced in the House. I wonder what might happen to it there?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. America has an immediate need for this type of legislation
hopefully it will have "Real Teeth" enforcement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can they do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, the Supreme Court challenge would be entertaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mindwalker_i Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. But but but... wouldn't that be a "litmus" test?
You know, like requiring judges to have knowledge and skills related to law was a litmus test,or wanting to uphold actual law was a litmus test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. The republican will protect
their five thugs at all cost.Roberts and his rogues will be protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Anthony Weiner was part of that effort to get that bill
introduced to Congress. That is the reason he is gone.

Murphy wanted Weiner to stay, but we only heard from those who wanted him to go.

Thanks for the reminder.

Clarence Thomas is Citizens United man on the SC. They helped put him there and he has returned the favor whenever he had a chance. It is reprehensible and the main spokesperson keeping this issue before the public was Rep. Weiner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC