Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama should take the McConnell plan and then cut every bloated defense project

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:15 PM
Original message
Obama should take the McConnell plan and then cut every bloated defense project
and subsidy that helps Kentucky he can find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. See TPM on this, not that simple. I think This McConnell thing is a TRAP.
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/the-big-blink-mcconnell-proposes-giving-obama-authority-to-raise-debt-limit-alone.php

The plan would require Congress to pass a bill allowing Obama to raise the debt limit on his own, contingent on a series of steps: Obama would have to notify Congress of his intent tor raise the debt limit -- a high-sign to Congress that would be subject to an official censure known as a "resolution of disapproval," and which Obama could veto. If he vetoed the resolution, and if Congress sustained the veto, then Obama would also have to outline a series of hypothetical spending cuts he'd make, equal to the amount of new debt authority he'd give himself. Only then would the Treasury be allowed to issue new debt.

McConnell proposes rolling out this process in three tranches, to force Obama to request more borrowing authority, and to force debt limit votes in Congress, repeatedly through election season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. The big assumption you make there is that he'd want to. Look at his latest defense budget:


They upped the defense budget by $17 billion dollars, still $9 billion less than the President sought.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. There's always 1 or 2 very expensive projects to get rid of.
They know where the bodies are buried. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. The House wouldn't let it pass. Sorry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah that's just what he'll do.
Right before he nationalizes the banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Off to the FEMA camps with you!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. he should not. it would be HIS tax increase. he should not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's not
how the deal would work. It's a face-saving proposal for Republicans to have more opportunities to repeat their lunacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. This used to be possible; it was called Presidential Impoundment
The president does not have the power to refuse spending money allocated by congress anymore.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impoundment_of_appropriated_funds

So the next time anybody complains about the President spending money like a drunken sailor, remind them of who the real spendthrifts are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC