|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:15 PM Original message |
Obama should take the McConnell plan and then cut every bloated defense project |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FSogol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. K & R. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. See TPM on this, not that simple. I think This McConnell thing is a TRAP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. The big assumption you make there is that he'd want to. Look at his latest defense budget: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. There's always 1 or 2 very expensive projects to get rid of. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. The House wouldn't let it pass. Sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yeah that's just what he'll do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Off to the FEMA camps with you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. he should not. it would be HIS tax increase. he should not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
9. That's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-12-11 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
10. This used to be possible; it was called Presidential Impoundment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC