Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Priceless: Birthers Sue Esquire Over Satirical Article

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:38 AM
Original message
Priceless: Birthers Sue Esquire Over Satirical Article
You just can't make this shit up. Birthers are pissed people are laughing at them and they're bloody well suing!!!

Just over a month ago, Esquire Magazine's Mark Warren published an item on the magazine's Politics blog titled, "BREAKING: Jerome Corsi's Birther Book Pulled from Shelves!" Warren's piece was a subtle, yet easily detectable fake item that very specifically satirized the spirit of Corsi's Where's The Birth Certificate?, in that, if Corsi could get away with selling obvious lies to people too dumb to know any better, why couldn't Esquire?

The whole matter might have remained just a blip in the universe of political satire, but it so aggrieved Corsi and WorldNetDaily CEO Joseph Farah, that they intimated that they would consider legal action against Esquire for making them the butt of a joke. And now that threat has been delivered upon: the pair have filed suit against the magazine, Warren, and Esquire's parent company, Hearst Corp. Forbes blogger Jeff Bercovici has all the gory details ("the full amount sought totals more than $285 million") and a copy of the suit itself.

According to Bercovici, Farah and Corsi claim that "the article succeeded...in interfering with their ability to sell books through Barnes & Noble, Amazon, Tower and other retailers. The plaintiffs also say that Warren’s parody exposed them to 'extreme ridicule in the community where they reside and where their works are viewed and read.'”


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Herewith snips of the "objectionable" piece.


BREAKING: Jerome Corsi's Birther Book Pulled from Shelves!


In a stunning development one day after the release of Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President, by Dr. Jerome Corsi, World Net Daily Editor and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Farah has announced plans to recall and pulp the entire 200,000 first printing run of the book, as well as announcing an offer to refund the purchase price to anyone who has already bought either a hard copy or electronic download of the book.

When asked if he had any plans to publish a corrected version of the book, he said cryptically, "There is no book." Farah declined to comment on his discussions of the matter with Corsi.

A source at WND, who requested that his name be withheld, said that Farah was "rip-shit" when, on April 27, President Obama took the extraordinary step of personally releasing his "long-form" birth certificate, thus resolving the matter of Obama's legitimacy for "anybody with a brain."
"He called up Corsi and really tore him a new one," says the source. "I mean, we'll do anything to hurt Obama, and erase his memory, but we don't want to look like fucking idiots, you know? Look, at the end of the day, bullshit is bullshit."

UPDATE, 12:25 p.m., for those who didn't figure it out yet, and the many on Twitter for whom it took a while: We committed satire this morning to point out the problems with selling and marketing a book that has had its core premise and reason to exist gutted by the news cycle, several weeks in advance of publication. Are its author and publisher chastened? Well, no. They double down, and accuse the President of the United States of perpetrating a fraud on the world by having released a forged birth certificate. Not because this claim is in any way based on reality, but to hold their terribly gullible audience captive to their lies, and to sell books. This is despicable, and deserves only ridicule. That's why we committed satire in the matter of the Corsi book. Hell, even the president has a sense of humor about it all.


I dibs a court seat!!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. It will be dismissed faster than the ink hitting the paper.
The Supreme Court wouldn't allow Jerry Falwell to sue Larry Flynt for his satirical "advertisement" in Hustler based on First Amendment Free Speech.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Another SLAPP suit?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLAPP

Strategic lawsuit against public participation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.<1>

The typical SLAPP plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff's goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate. A SLAPP is often preceded by a legal threat. The difficulty, of course, is that plaintiffs do not present themselves to the Court admitting that their intent is to censor, intimidate or silence their critics. Hence, the difficulty in drafting SLAPP legislation, and in applying it, is to craft an approach which affords an early termination to invalid abusive suits, without denying a legitimate day in court to valid good faith claims.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'd say this suit borders on being held as frivolous.
The legal standard is well established.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Aren't these the same people who decry "frivilous lawsuits"?
These birthers file suits more often than they change their underwear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Frivolous laws suits and..........
anyone who thinks they shouldn't be able to call for someone's murder by claiming 'free speech'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, I hope Esquire gets the most expensive legal team can buy, and loser pays.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, negative book reviews interfere in commerce ...
in worthless books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hate after-birthers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. This reminds me of O'Reilly v. Franken over Lies and the Lying Liars. A frivolous nuisance suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC