Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barney Frank was involved in a sex scandal in the 1980's - why did he get a pass?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 03:57 PM
Original message
Barney Frank was involved in a sex scandal in the 1980's - why did he get a pass?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. The repubs were less vicious then?
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 04:01 PM by Turbineguy
And the Democrats helped them less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Larry Craig tried to get Frank kicked out of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. He wasn't involved.
Your facts are wrong. That is a right wing talking point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomb Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. He got a pass? That's what that millstone of innuendo around his neck is called? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Also, that was before our country devolved into hate consciousness..before hate radio
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 04:06 PM by solara
before the politics of fear & self-righteousness ( also self-loathing) grabbed hold -

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. he didn't get a pass, there was some vote against him , also they investigated
and found he wasn't involved in what his former partner had been doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is life fair? Are people's and politicians' actions always consistent throughout the decades?
Is the political landscape of 2011 the same as in the 1980s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is just a guess
but maybe when the shit hit the fan (and there was some, truly), his first reaction wasn't to lie to House leadership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, it was a bit different
Frank was the innocent party. His roommate was the one running a gay escort service out of the apartment without Frank's knowledge. Frank was a workaholic who was rarely home, although he knew that Gobie (the roommate) had a troubled history and paid for his court ordered therapist. Both men said they were friends and never lovers.

The right wing really tried to get him out of office through guilt by association but the good people of his district in Mass. weren't buying a word of it and have reelected him ever since. The barrage of sickening propaganda from the right would have put a rat off a garbage truck.

I had the pleasure of voting for him in one election, myself, and that was after the "scandal."

Here's his bio and it should give you a clue why he was kept in office: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_Frank

His district is one of the wealthier areas although there are a few slummy areas I could afford. I didn't like the commute so I was only there for one election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thank you for that.
At least there's a few sane people here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broderick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Thanks for that synopsis
I just knew the facts were wrong, and was too lazy to do research. Long day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Social Networking...digitial cameras...
Comparing today's scandals to those of 30-40 years ago is pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I've always wondered why he got a pass
Wasn't his significant other turning tricks and selling drugs out of his house? That's what I remember, anyway.

Maybe his banking and corporatist ties kept him out of the death spiral that usually happens in cases loaded with that much scandal.

At the time, I thought there was no way he would survive, but then again I don't see how Al Sharpton survives the Tawana Brawley incident, which IMHO, he has blood on his hands on that one. There were riots over that fraudulent case, and he knew it was a lie, but went ahead anyway to gain fame and fortune.

And Clinton gets impeached over a BJ, yet war crimes like torture are off the table. BTW, Obama has blood on his hands on that one for "looking ahead". Covering up war crimes is an impeachable offense.

BTW, I like Barney Frank overall, and Obama, too. Sharpton, not so much, although I love to hear him speak, and almost always support his views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I think it was his boy-toy, not his significant other...
who was using Barney's place to set up trysts. As I understood it then (and still believe) Barney did not break the law, nor was he aware of what his new paramour was doing. He was guilty only of being an infatuated old fool -- something many men are, both gay and straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. No internets or social media. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. I suppose I should remember this
but I don't. I have two or so responces, though.

The first answer is simple: Tip O'Neil

The second is: He's from Massachusetts, where true maverick liberals are praised, not destroyed.



If nothing else, Frank is quite beloved in his district, and I'm sure they would have stuck with him, regardless of what others said about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. The Turd Way influence was much less and millions of natural Republicans had not
jumped the fence to wreck our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think our culture has changed since the Frank and Clinton scandals
Edited on Mon Jun-13-11 05:23 PM by ecstatic
Just like we've changed on other issues--race, female sexuality, gay rights, etc. Then again, that doesn't explain why some repub offenders are still in office...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. He managed to have it over with in the mid-1980's
By the 1990's, sexual scandal was considered juicy by the mainstream media. I doubt he would have had a similar outcome in this last decade.

Besides, once your constituents re-elect you, it's considered over, for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC