Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNBC Scams America Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:37 AM
Original message
CNBC Scams America Again
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/mark-ames/36001/cnbc-scams-america-again

The headline that topped the Drudge Report Tuesday morning had frightening news for its millions of readers: yet another credit ratings agency downgraded America's debt, this time to "C"--at or near "junk" status in the letter-rating scales used by the big three ratings agencies, Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch. Clicking on the link takes the reader to a CNBC article <1> headlined, "US Debt Rating Should Be ‘C’: Independent Agency."

The agency turns out to be not one of the big three but an outfit called Weiss Ratings. Scratch the surface, and it turns out that Weiss Ratings is far from “independent,” and the rating, itself, is bogus. Weiss Ratings, headed by Martin D. Weiss, an investment advisor who has more than once run afoul of the SEC, downgraded US debt to "C" (which the article says is equivalent to BBB- or "near-junk" status) despite that the fact that the last time the US defaulted on external and domestic debt obligations was 1790 <2>. Even the Economist has acknowledged <3>, "Talk of Amer
Meanwhile, CNBC failed to disclose the ratings agency has a content-distribution licensing agreement with TheStreet.com <4>, whose chairman and co-founder is CNBC host Jim Cramer.

Cramer's company owned Weiss Ratings until last year, when TheStreet.com sold it back to Weiss for an undisclosed sum. Since then Weiss and Cramer's firm TheStreet.com have had a cross-licensing agreement to promote each other's ratings. CNBC should have done journalistic due diligence. But instead it hyped the rating. At the very least, portraying a ratings agency as "independent" on CNBC when a top CNBC on-air personality has a business interest in that relationship is misleading.

Jim Cramer has a history of making controversial investment calls. The host of the popular CNBC show "Mad Money" has come under fire from the New York Times and Jon Stewart's Daily Show <5> for repeatedly misleading his viewers. In a videotaped interview in 2006, Cramer boasted about how to manipulate stock prices by spreading false rumors.

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe the Government
should start rating the rating agency's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Funny how they don't bring up the record of S&P, Moody's or Fitch, and how they not only dropped the
ball by rating garbage as investment grade before the financial collapse

Those rating agencies should have lost all their credibility then, and been driven out of business

The conflict of interest is so evident it is pathetic

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just for perspective,
Cramer's show is the highest rated on CNBC, which is not saying much. His best total for a day seems to be at around half a million viewers, in a nation of well over 300 million. This means that a vast majority of Americans do not even know who he is. His influence is a bit short of 'scamming America'. He's a snake oil shill, to be sure. Just not a widely heard shill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Tell me if I'm wrong here
Another credit rating agency has downgraded American debt.

Low Fed interest rates are making it possible for banks to borrow all the money they want, and they're investing it right back into U.S. debt, leading to a gigantic backdoor bailout.

If you downgrade American debt, it might lead to an increase in bond interest rates.

Therefore, the credit rating agencies, which are paid by the banks, might want the bond interest rate to increase to inflate the size of that backdoor bailout.

Is it tinfoil hat time for me? :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
6. Morons...
...exposing themselves everyday.

But since the country is filled with economic illiterates they get away with it.

Meanwhile, gleeful commodities traders leverage the herd's stupidity into millions of dollars.

(But if they think the dollar is worthless, why do they spend so much time chasing it?)

And the world turns round and round...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
discocrisco01 Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe We Should Become The Commodities Traders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Fed + Goldman Sachs + Government corruption = average Joe fucked
Edited on Fri May-06-11 11:04 AM by LatteLibertine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC