Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

www.osborneink.com "Nixon had a word for people like Jane Hamsher"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:22 PM
Original message
www.osborneink.com "Nixon had a word for people like Jane Hamsher"
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 06:08 PM by MrScorpio
DEC 13, 2010 firebaggers

Jane the Hamsher is one of the cool kids, I realize; her front page status at Arianna’s place helps maintain her illusion of intellect and relevance. Yet she wouldn’t recognize progress if it smacked her in the face, and so far has achieved nothing resembling progress on any front. Indeed, I have been waiting for someone to tell me what this woman’s “progressive” credentials are.

She is first and foremost a self-aggrandizing publicity whore whose Accountability Now PAC has so far given $0 to progressive candidates in the first two years of its existence while spending $285,272. If she ran a non-profit this way, it would get shut down. As things stand, the PAC (which also counts Kos and Glenn Greenwald as operators) has only made noise.

Accountability Now PAC started in the wake of Greenwald’s Salon eruption over Democrats voting for FISA telecom immunity. In what he aptly described as a “strange bedfellows” campaign, the PAC’s foundation came in the heady days of Ron Paul triangulation and was always aimed at attacking Democrats from the left.

This was reflected in her media appearances. Hamsher’s kill-the-bill madness included an appearance on FOX News just months after her own call to boycott the network. She later returned to that channel spouting nonsense about cap-and-trade. Her recent appearances on Lawrence O’Donnell leave me convinced progress is not her purpose.

http://www.osborneink.com/2010/12/nixon-had-a-word-for-people-like-jane-hamsher.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nixon wanted a guaranteed basic income. Liberal Commie!!!!111 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. And some of us had a word for people like Nixon.
Nixon is a plumber's friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. And I have a word for people like Nixon...
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 05:28 PM by walldude
Assholes... You are bolstering your hate for Hamsher with a quote from Richard Nixon?

Here's what Nixon had to say about Jews:

The Jews are irreligious, atheistic, immoral bunch of bastards.
Nixon to Bob Haldeman (1 February 1972)


So.. tell me again why I should listen to Richard Milhouse Nixon? Or to anyone who would use him to try to discredit a blogger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Quoting Tricky Dick would not be my preferred rhetorical device
It's the title of the article, by the way.

However, the author has stated his case about the blogger in question.

Not everyone on the left is a fan of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I can take her or leave her...
But this? You say "Quoting Tricky Dick would not be my preferred rhetorical device" and then you went and did that very thing. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's the title of the article
I usually put the actual titles of articles in the subject line.

If you have a problem with what he wrote, I suggest that you take up your objections with him.

The link to his own liberal blog is right there for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Excuse me, but you felt it was important enough to post here
it's a little late to be claiming innocence. He didn't post this on DU you did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yep, I posted it alright,
But obviously, we're having this particular discussion because the gist of the article is being ignore for the sake of creating drama over the title.

A distraction device, in any case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And I have a word for people like people who like Nixon
But it's pretty much the same thing as what you said actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Admiration for Dick wasn't the point of the article
The author only mentions Nixon twice, with his attention getting title and with a punchline at the end.

I doubt that anyone around here is expressing any admiration for the Old Dead Crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Nope. It was about the similarity between the writer and Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nixon had "interesting" words for Jews and many other ethnic groups as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. And some people have a word for ANY leftist activist...
Shitlisted! (I know it's a stretch of a word, but it works.:evilgrin:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's an article about Accountability Now with nary a Nixon reference.
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 06:02 PM by MilesColtrane
Hopefully people will pay attention to the actual content.

http://www.progressiveelectorate.com/diary/2329/jane-hamshers-accountability-now-pac-raises-questions


Jane Hamsher's Accountability Now PAC Raises $$ Questions
by: Curtis Abbey
Share |
Fri Apr 09, 2010 at 17:07:03 PM CDT

Maybe accountable wasn't the best word to use for one of Jane Hamsher's PACs. These PACs have been in the blog news lately for some curious, misleading and wasteful spending. The charges range;
1. Jane paying herself and her friends considerable chunks of the donations by "hiring" friendly firms that Jane or her friends run and own. So she signs the check on the front and back under different organizations. Whatever the PAC needed they seem to have a firm to take care of that, website, media, research, polling, consulting and blogging. This is evident in the filings from FDL Action PAC as reported by rcade at the DailyKos

Out of the $234,920 raised by FDL Action PAC in 2009, $44,192 was paid to Firedoglake and other business entities affiliated with Hamsher, according to FEC filings. The PAC paid $16,411 to Firedoglake for "shared general administrative expenses," $14,111 to the site for "list purchase," $9,920 to CommonSense Media for "online advertising" and $3,750 to KMP Research for "strategic consulting."
2. On top of the incestuous expense filings there is the concern that such a large chunk of donations go to administrative costs. For a group so concerned about the overhead in insurance companies, they sure aren't watching their own overhead. It appears they are interested in quite the opposite. Rcade has a handy chart that I've borrowed with the totals for 2009.

Recipient Amount FEC Purpose of Disbursement
Executive director Jeffrey Hauser $41,250 Strategic consulting
Executive director Benjamin Tribbett $24,460.05 Strategic consulting
PAC founder Jane Hamsher $24,000 Strategic consulting, research consulting
PAC founder Glenn Greenwald $24,000 Strategic consulting
Management consultant Marisa McNee $23,547 Strategic consulting
Management consultant David Meyer $14,500 Strategic consulting
Charles Monaco $7,100 Strategic consulting
Michael Whitney $5,894.98 Strategic consulting
Libertas LLC $5,250 Strategic consulting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thanks, Bro
It's amazing how just mentioning the Ol' Trickster can throw an adult conversation off track... Even in this day and age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Wow.
She's quite the grifter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Wow! That calls for a serious investigation.
Now it makes sense that Hamsher and Greenwald spew some of the muck-raking sensationalist bullshit they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. What's to investigate? There is nothing out of line with those expenditures.
Accountability Now has never presented itself as a conduit for campaign contributions.

There mission is twofold:

"(a) to create a network of organizational donors and supporters, to form an infrastructure that will enable progressive candidates to mount a credible challenge against incumbents, and (b) to recruit credible primary challengers by identifying vulnerable incumbents, finding good challengers, and then persuading them to run."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I agree. $40k for an executive director?
Seems to me the people getting paid for their work are doing so at a REDUCED rate.

But anything to go after the "loud left" or "sanctimonious purist" or "fucking retards" or whatever colorful adjectives the administration is using this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. She paid herself (Firedoglake.com) over $14K of PAC money to purchase a list she already had.
That might be legal, but it stinks to high heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. Jackpine's Corollary
to Godwin's Law:

As the length of any political thread approaches infinity, the likelihood of a Nixon reference approaches unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. You're stooping, stooping really low in your past few posts in defense of the president
First implying racism on the left for justifiably criticizing the president, now trotting out Nixon's hoary ghost.

Sad the lengths people will go to defend the indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. LOL
God forbid anyone defend President Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I stubbed my toe today...
So, I'm going to blame Obama.

Hey, he can't get away with everything on my watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. Why are we interested in Nixon's quotes? Why aren't we
more interested in what Kennedy had to say about people who disagreed with him? " Fears of shattering the warm feelings of perceived unanimity -- of rocking the boat -- kept some of Kennedy's advisors from objecting to the Bay of Pigs plan before it was too late. After that huge blunder, JFK revamped his decision-making process to encourage dissent and critical evaluation among his team. In the Cuban missile crisis, virtually the same policymakers produced superior results.{2}"http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMNsEoG/b.4221087/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hamsher is scum.
I wish she and FDL would be banned from DU.

She and FDL do nothing to further progressive causes or discussion. They are shit-slingers and nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I wholeheartedly disagree and resent you calling her "scum"
This post attacking her is pretty uncalled for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I think it's pretty accurate.
From her pairing up with Norquist and the Teabaggers, to her overt Obama bashing, to her questionable PAC, there really isn't a much more apt description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Going on Fox, spouting GOP talking points sounds pretty scummy to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. I will never understand all the Hamsher hate
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 10:10 PM by Ramulux
In the end the only legitimate criticism I have ever heard anyone say about her was that stupid picture of Joe Lieberman in black face that she put on her website. Hamsher has been right about Obama and the dems from day one, and all the apologists have attacked her mercilessly for being willing to tell the truth about Obama's corporatist behavior.

This article is disgusting and something I would expect on FreeRepublic or some other right-wing rag. So, being against the health care bill for being nothing but a giveaway to the private insurance companies somehow automatically makes you a publicity whore? Being willing to go on cable news and explain your positions, automatically makes you a publicity whore? This crap is absurd and this whole article is just this guy bitching about the fact that Jane has been right from the beginning and he was wrong. Its pathetic that so many people on this site have jumped on the FireDogLake bashing wagon, when they couldn't be more on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. It's not even an article. It's a post on some guy's blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I am so sorry
I failed to distinguish between an article and a blog post. Lord have mercy on my soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Um. I was agreeing with you. It's crap.
It's not journalism... it's just crap on some dude's website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I know
I was just joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. DLC hates all progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
39. K&R It's interesting to me that blogs/post from members of the black blogosphere are being locked
repeatedly on this site. Somehow, the words of black bloggers are not to be trusted or are too "inflammatory" but this piece detailing Jane Hamsher's underhanded dealings has certain folks frothing at the mouth.

Wonder if posts from her will get the same reception that posts from black bloggers are getting? Though of course, none of these black bloggers have done anything that warrants an apparent investigation from law enforcement, unlike Ms. Hamster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. I wonder if it's related to that article that was going around today
on white progressives not "getting it" about the Obama administration thanks in part to white privilege. I don't really have a fully-formed thought here, but I think the juxtaposition is interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. There have been a few articles in the news in the last few weeks
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 12:21 AM by Number23
from black journalists/bloggers/academics urging the white progressives who have been behaving as though they have bees in their undies to calm it down a bit.

Quite a few have been posted here and for some reason, many of them have been locked. All I can do is shake my head because for the life of me, I will never understand why the voices of the most loyal supporters and the most critical component of the Democratic Party's base would be silenced here.

I don't really have a fully-formed thought here, but I think the juxtaposition is interesting.

What do you find interesting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
41. Jane has an unual face. It appears to be kind of rodent-like, maybe bad plastic surgery?
Seriously, I've never seen that kind of facial structure before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-14-10 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Let's see your face.
I think she is cute. Let's see how great you look after having cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC