Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Unprecedented obstruction and false equivalencies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 11:12 AM
Original message
Unprecedented obstruction and false equivalencies
Posted with permission.

Unprecedented obstruction and false equivalencies
Steve Benen

Politico has a piece today on Senate Democrats outrage over Republican obstructionism, as evidenced by Tuesdays filibuster of judicial nominee Caitlin Halligan and todays expected filibuster of CFPB nominee Richard Cordray. As Dems see it, GOP abuses are setting a new standard which Democrats will take advantage of the next time theyre in the minority.

Theres an old saying, What goes around, comes around, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said.

Republicans respond that these current tactics arent new, and the Politico article tells readers the GOP argument is sound.

To a tremendous degree, Republicans have relied on filibuster threats over the last three years to stop Democratic legislation in its tracks but theyve replicated stall tactics used by Democrats when they were in the minority.

Indeed, Republicans complain about Democratic filibusters on President George W. Bushs judicial nominees, something that McConnell himself has said led to the situation the Senate finds itself in today. And the filibuster has been increasingly used for decades by the Senate minority party to block everything from routine motions to landmark bills, worsening the partisan gridlock.

If they return to the minority, Democrats say they wont arbitrarily filibuster legislation because of a pure political vendetta. But Don Stewart, McConnells spokesman, said the Democrats latest threats are nothing new, saying they launched serial filibusters when they were in the minority during the Bush years.

This isnt a subjective question on which the parties are entitled to different opinions. There are objective, often quantifiable, answers to the points Politico and Republicans are raising: are GOP senators replicating Democratic tactics? Were Dems abusing Senate rules in the Bush era to the same degree that Republicans are abusing them now?

The answer to both is no, and the false equivalence does little to advance the discussion.

Heres a chart Brian Beutler put together a year ago, showing the explosion in the number of filibusters. (Its a little tough to read; click on it for a bigger view.)

The Senate keeps an updated table, charting cloture votes by Congress over the last nine decades, using three metrics: (1) cloture motions filed (when the majority begins to end a filibuster); (2) votes on cloture (when the majority tries to end a filibuster); and (3) the number of times cloture was invoked (when the majority succeeds in ending a filibuster). By all three measures, obstructionism soared as Republican abused the rules like no party in American history.

Consider this tidbit: cloture was invoked 63 times in 2009 and 2010, which isnt just the most ever, its more than the sum total of instances from 1919 through 1982. Thats not a typo.

Yes, obstructionism is proving to be far less severe in this Congress, but thats not because Senate Republicans have suddenly become more responsible its because theres a right-wing House majority and theres now far less for the Senate to do.

Much of the political world would have the public believe that the Senate status quo is just normal operating procedure for the institution. Thats plainly false. The Senate wasnt designed to work this way; it didnt use to work this way; and it cant work this way.

As James Fallows recently explained: To make it clear: requiring 60 votes for everything is new, and it is overwhelmingly a Republican tactic.
Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-11 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Politico finds actual reporting too be way to difficult. Fact- checking Republican claims is too
Edited on Thu Dec-08-11 11:38 AM by emulatorloo
much work.

Thanks for your post. Benen is one of the best writers out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 26th 2017, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC