Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Both Bachmann and Perry will implode from "foot in mouth" disease. We just have to wait for it.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:19 PM
Original message
Both Bachmann and Perry will implode from "foot in mouth" disease. We just have to wait for it.
It's already happening with Bachmann -- ridiculous comments that are labelled "jokes" by her staff. Perry's shenanigans in Texas will catch up with him soon and he will have to explain himself. Mouth meet foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just heard something about the "joke" by Bachmann -- what did she
say, do you know? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's ranting about Irene being "God's will" to get the attention of lawmakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Wouldn't that quality as taking the name of the Lord in vain,?
I've just been poking around on Christian sites to see what they actually take that commandment to mean. And though a lot of them define it pretty narrowly as saying "God damn it!" other have a broader understanding that would seem to include Bachmann's "joke."
http://carm.org/exodus-207-do-not-take-name-lord-vain

God commands us not to use His name in vain.

A. The NIV translates it as, "Do no misuse the name of the LORD." But most Bibles say, ‘Do not use the name of the LORD in vain.’

B. The word vain is the Hebrew word shav. It has a variety of translations including emptiness, vanity, falsehood, nothingness, emptiness of speech, lying, and worthlessness.
i. To misuse God's name means literally, "to lift it up to or attach it to emptiness."
ii. No one is to use the Lord's name in this manner.

So which is it, Michele? Do you really believe God sends text messages to earth via natural disasters? Or were you taking the Lord's name in vain by turning your own religion into a joke?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Thanks! Jeez, that's their answer for everything, isn't it? Like
there's never been a hurricane before. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Not only that, but why couldn't Irene show God's displeasure with teabaggers?
We didn't start this run of weird natural disasters until the Tea Party was formed. Why couldn't THAT be what God is mad about? Supposedly "Christian" teabaggers defile the message of Christ with each un-American, inhuman policy and statement. What's a God to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not Perry, I think. That's what he does: Runs for Office. He doesn't govern. One thing....
the one thing that may cost him is his stance on illegal immigrants. Texas is a sanctuary state, with Perry's blessing. Houston is a sanctuary city, with Perry's blessing. Many of the so-called "new jobs" here in Texas are filled by illegals, with Perry's blessing. (Big 'bidness like cheap illegals, and Perry likes whatever big 'bidness likes.)

When all of that starts to get out...the tea partiers and other Republicans won't be happy.

He's already trying to backpeddle. Making statements about the need for a fence, etc., etc. But that is not his history with that issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let's hope Perry doesn't implode before he takes out Romney.
Of the Republican candidates, I think only Romney has a chance to beat Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's what I was thinking
In comparison to Perry and Bachmann, Romney looks far too sane. Huntsman would be a threat to Obama if anyone knew who he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't underestimate the stupid. Bush* imploded that way constantly - look where it "got" him
(with understanding that both his "victories" were crimes of election theft)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wait for it? those fucks do it everyday already....
the say some of the most fucked up shit and lie on top of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ronald Reagan said dumb, crazy stuff all the time,,,and he still never lost an election
When the economy is doing poorly or perceived as doing poorly incumbent presidents almost always become unpopular and lose. When the economy is doing well or perceived as doing well incumbents presidents almost always become popular and win. But President Obama has a better chance than most of defying this pattern - simply because his most likely opponents are so far removed from the majority of American consciousness. In a sane and rational world Rick Perry would not have a prayer of a chance to win the presidency. In fact it would have been inconceivable in the days before right-wing extremism was mainstreamed into American popular culture over the last thirty years or so. But he still should not be electable. Most Americans - the vast majority certainly believe in God and that Jesus Christ is the savior - but they are not right-wing religious nuts about it - like the people Rick Perry makes a point of surrounding himself with. Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush could win because the country club Republicans and the Wall Street Republicans were on board and as enthusiastic as the right-wing fundamentalist - but they had no worries that the fundamentalist would be actually calling all the shots. Rick Perry may well scare away a lot of Republican voters and economically conservative but somewhat socially liberal independent voters because one does get the impression that the right-nuts will be calling most the shots if he should win. But we still can not ignore the simple reality that the economy is most probably not going to be doing that well in October/November 2012 and under such circumstances the unthinkable becomes completely plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Reagan is liberal compared to these nuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Even George W. Bush is starting to look liberal compared to these nuts
What passes for acceptable political discourse course is way to the right of where it was in 1980 and 1984 and even 2000 and 2004. Even Reagan Republicans - even George W. Bush had to at least claim that they believed in helping those who really were not able to help themselves. Reagan Republicans and even George W. Bush could not have imagined painting the wealthiest 2% as victims and the bottom 50% as parasites. Maybe they thought it and mumbled it among themselves. But they could have never said it out loud. But this is now mainstream discourse in today's post-Reagan/post George W. Bush America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. A guy you would like to have a beer with ...
That is how they packaged a moron while somehow finding a way to negatively frame Al Gore as "arrogant."

The "liberal media" advances whatever frames the right wing wants it to ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. They 'foot and mouth' everytime they open their mouths! MSM NEVER calls them on it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. We have a winner ...
We crossed that line a while ago - Rs can say pretty much anything, as long as they don't apologize for it, which they have learned not to, it goes away ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. Bachmann puts her foot in her mouth so often
that her favorite flavor is "toe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. The media will clean up any mess they make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yep, see above ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheapdate Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Completely wrong about implosion. These people absolutely don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. yeah two main points:.their followers don't care and the media will have their backs
at least in the case of Perry. Bachmann is not considered electable and a little too embarrassing - so they may have a go at her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Agreed on all points ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Bachmann is like Palin -
a money train for the GOP. The Christian Fundies love them and will give good $$$s to hear them speak. Neither of them will win a Primary but Palin did win the 2010 elections for the GOP.

Bachmann cannot win but she will attract lots of fundie money. The GOP candidate has already been decided. It is Perry. The rest of the bullshit is nothing but a method to extract money out of the loons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. "Fools and their money....." /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. You are familiar with George W. Bush, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yes! I'd like to think that now that America has seen 8 years of stupidity in the WH,
they might think twice about electing someone whose brain and mouth do not operate at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSanon Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hey, let Bachmann win the R primary:) Obama wins 2nd term for SURE!
Just imagine that you lost your home in NC or VA in the storm, regardless of your affiliation or economic class, would you be inclined to vote for a candidate who said that it happened because G-- is mad at you? I'm sure that the business side of the right does not want to hear fire and brimstone sermons in the State of the Union Address. Does anyone really want that type anywhere near the nuquelar missyle launch codes? In will be viva la lesser evil for the deciding swing-voters no matter how disappointing the "Obama economy" gets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC