Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Sides With Panetta On Need To Cut Medicare Over Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 05:23 PM
Original message
Obama Sides With Panetta On Need To Cut Medicare Over Defense
Edited on Mon Aug-08-11 05:50 PM by Cali_Democrat

Obama Sides With Panetta On Need To Cut Medicare Over Defense
Brian Beutler | August 8, 2011, 3:32PM

Last week, Congressional Democrats were blindsided by newly-confirmed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who basically nixed any further cuts to military spending, and demanded that lawmakers trim from programs like Medicare and raise taxes to reduce future deficits.

Soon a new deficit Super Committee will begin debating tax and entitlement reform, and the penalty if they gridlock includes steep defense cuts. Republicans are expected to seize on Panetta's remarks to push for another deficit deal that comes exclusively from entitlement cuts. So Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) called on President Obama to repudiate Panetta.

Obama did precisely the opposite in his White House speech Monday. "Our challenge is the need to tackle our deficits over the long term last week we reached an historic agreement -- reached an agreement that weill make historic cuts to defense and domestic spending," Obama said. "But there's not much further that we can cut in either of those categories. What we need to do now is combine those spending cuts with two additional steps: tax reform that will ask those who can afford it to pay their fair share and modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare."

Obama also vowed to send the Super Committee his own deficit reduction recommendations. But Republicans are already locking themselves into against any plan that increases tax revenues. If they remain locked in, the question is whether Obama and Democrats would be willing to pull the trigger on the penalty or whether they'll cave to GOP demands again.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/08/obama-sides-with-panetta-on-need-to-cut-medicare-over-defense.php


Remember my post about this on Friday? I hate to say I told you so, but.....I told you so.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x736883



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Missed his speech - did he announce that he's running as a Republican in 2012?
Edited on Mon Aug-08-11 05:26 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Given his actions
it's safe to assume they're the ones who will be voting for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Last week, Congressional Democrats were blindsided by newly-confirmed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta
....... who basically nixed any further cuts to military spending, and demanded that lawmakers trim from programs like Medicare and raise taxes to reduce future deficits.



Well guess what Leon, the budget isnt up to you.

Hey Congress, grow a pair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who'd have thunk it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, he didn't
President Obama

<...>

Last week, we reached an agreement that will make historic cuts to defense and domestic spending. But there’s not much further we can cut in either of those categories. What we need to do now is combine those spending cuts with two additional steps: tax reform that will ask those who can afford it to pay their fair share and modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare.

<...>


TPM:

    "...last week we reached an historic agreement -- reached an agreement that weill make historic cuts to defense and domestic spending," Obama said. "But there's not much further that we can cut in either of those categories.

    "What we need to do now is combine those spending cuts with two additional steps: tax reform that will ask those who can afford it to pay their fair share and modest adjustments to health care programs like Medicare."


Despite TPM's catchy headline, it's a misrepresentation of what the President said. The point of the statement was tax increase.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Beat me to it. He NEVER agreed with Panetta.
And agreed, the point of the statement was to frame the tax reform.

The GOP goes under the tax microscope and they are still parroting the Tea Party line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. And with the tremendous success he's had up to now with his
'framing the issues', I imagine we'll be seeing cuts to Medicare shortly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. Don't worry, the GOP will frame it and then Obama will wrap it up and put a bow around it
Here you go, it's bipartisan goodness!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rury Donating Member (629 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Unrecced for totally misrepresenting what President Obama said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Here too...
I don't know if it is a misunderstanding, or a deliberate misrepresentation, but it is completesly worng. Unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another dishonest misrepresentation from you.
What will your trust rating be now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. A risible post.
Either your reading comprehension is diabolical or you're wilfully misrepresenting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Unrec for false headline. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who woulda' ever thunk it? Who in their wildest imagination? Certainly those adjustments
to Medicare will not matter to or hurt anyone: the availability of care and the price thereof will surely not be affected by any such "adjustments." No siree. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Huge Unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-08-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. There's real defense and silly defense
cut the billions from Afghanistan and Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. we shall see how far the President pushes this distinction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC