Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which President Cared More About the Country and Less About Reelection?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:38 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which President Cared More About the Country and Less About Reelection?
I'm going to leave Obama out of this, since that would turn into a flamewar.

So which of the last ten Presidents genuinely cared most about what was good for the country instead of his chances for reelection?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ford
He knew he wasn't getting elected, let alone re-elected after he pardoned Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pardoning Nixon was "what's best for the country"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. In his own mind
In my mind, it was the beginning of the end. This precedent was the direct antecedent of the Bush torture regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Actually that could've been a political decision for Ford
Ford was unable to accomplish anything with the nation's attention fully focused on Watergate. So had he not pardoned Nixon, his presidency would've been completely overshadowed by the scandal and he would've likely lost anyway. It was a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of thing. And in the end Ford almost got himself re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. No question about it.
Lyndon B. Johnson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jimmy Carter
because no matter how he performed as POTUS, he truly CARED about people. He STILL does. So many of these candidates today, scream about how how "righteous" Christians they are, but Mr. Carter WALKED THE WALK and does today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Not to mention that the Carter Energy Plan would have had us energy independent by the year 2000
Which is why Reagan worked tirelessly to kill every provision of it.

The solar panel industry and wind turbine industry were showing steady growth... till Reagan killed the tax incentives and both industries disappeared.
Carter's goal of energy efficiency for homes and commercial buildings would have slashed our energy consumption... but Reagan killed that too.

When you think of the word TRAITOR does Benedict Arnold come to mind... or is it Ronald Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would say Ike
Ike knew he was unbeatable. What he did in Little Rock etc was so against his personal and political beliefs, but did the right thing anyway.
There are a couple of close honorable mentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I picked Ike for the same reason you said.
He knew he was pretty much unbeatable in the '56 election so he could concentrate on what he thought best for the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm sure they all care somewhat about being reelected
I don't really hold that against them. I'm sure I'd feel the same.

Really, I would think George Washington was the only one who truly didn't care about being re-elected.

Besides, that desire is consistent with doing what their constituents want. So what's so awful about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. James K Polk certainly didn't care about re-election
But I don't think DU would care so much for his imperialistic practices. But to answer your question, it's probably Jimmy Carter. If he'd cared a little more about his re-election he probably would've started a war with Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. I honestly don't know... but much of the time
they may be thinking that their re-election IS what is best for the Country. I guess I would have to go with Johnson.. only b/c he bowed out of the primaries for his second elected term and he passed civil rights legislation knowing that the South would swing to the Republican side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhcodem Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. I decided Jimmy Carter
even before I got to the list of options!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'd say LBJ
Edited on Mon Jul-25-11 08:37 AM by Armstead
Johnson basically pushed through a liberal social agenda. Although he obviously also wanted to win reelection the actual goals seemed ultimately more important to him.

The Vietnam Wat was a wrongheaded and awful disaster. So I am not defending his wisdom on this. But as it bercame more of a morass, he knew the politically expedient thing to do would have been to pull the plug and get out. But he didn't think it would be wise to do that, so he basically sacrificed himself to focus on trying to resolve it....In retrospect, he was dead wrong on that, but in terms of the OP, he did place what he thought was best for the country over his own political future.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichDem10 Donating Member (644 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'll take FDR for $2000 Alex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. I was torn between Bush and Reagan...
...since nobody else put them I figure they need a gag vote. I mean, Nixon got one! Hell Johnson got, like 5!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. Obama should be an option, because reelection is part and parcel to the state of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC