Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Social Security on the Fact Sheet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:46 PM
Original message
Social Security on the Fact Sheet
This is from the Fact Sheet/White House. I only copied and pasted the part about Social Security as that seems to be an important issue at the moment:

7. Social Security

The President does not believe that Social Security is a driver of our near-term deficit problems or is currently in crisis. But he supports bipartisan efforts to strengthen Social Security for the long haul, because its long-term challenges are better addressed sooner than later to ensure that it remains the rock-solid benefit for older Americans that it has been for past generations. The President in the State of the Union laid out his principles for Social Security reform which he believes should form the basis for bipartisan negotiations that could proceed in parallel to deficit negotiations:

Strengthen retirement security for the low-income and vulnerable; maintain robust disability and survivors’ benefits.
No privatization or weakening of the Social Security system; reform must strengthen Social Security and restore long-term solvency.
No current beneficiary should see the basic benefit reduced; nor will we accept an approach that slashes benefits for future generations.

For the entire (kind of long) Fact Sheet go to: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/13/fact-sheet-presidents-framework-shared-prosperity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chowder66 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Compare 'not reduced' to 'not slashed' in the English language.
That is why no one trusts what they say. The two terms sit side by side, each with a different meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-07-11 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. No current beneficiary will be fucked. Not so for the rest of you.
If they really wanted to "strengthen" it, they'd lift the cap.

This is all just BULLSHIT and when it gets cut they will say the usual pathetic crap about having to do it to save the economy from disaster. Always by screwing those who can afford it least.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC