Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was the Halperin "gaffe" a "Lonesome Rhodes" moment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 06:14 PM
Original message
Was the Halperin "gaffe" a "Lonesome Rhodes" moment?
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 06:17 PM by Empowerer
Remember in the film, "Face in the Crowd" when Marcia Jeffries exposes the hypocritical blowhard leading character, Lonesome Rhodes by flipping the switch on the camera and allowing his nasty smears of his loyal audience to go out live over the air?

Whether intentional or not, that's exactly what the new Morning Joe producer did today by NOT flipping the switch, thereby allowing Mark Halperin to be exposed for what he is.

Whoops...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. worst person, tonight? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dead on analogy! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Intern Killer's anger at this producer was revealing, too. He was more upset about that...
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 11:17 PM by ClarkUSA
... than Halperin calling the POTUS a "dick", from he and Mika's sniggering throughout the incident. He was always fuming about liberal "hate" during the Bush years...

Their collective karma got them. I love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wait, wasn't that a Simpsons episode?!?
Edited on Fri Jul-01-11 02:17 AM by Drunken Irishman


;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think he was just trying to be one of the guys by saying something naughty
The subject aside, sAying someone is being a dick is a very common phrase among guys. joh

Stewart says it and no one notices.

Halprin made such a big deal out if what he was about to say that it was unnatural.

Most guys would just say it a



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think you're right
He reminded me of the unpopular, awkward kid who, in his eagerness to be accepted by the cool kids, doesn't realize that he's being played by them. And so they goad him into doing something very embarrassing, insisting that they'll do it with him and will have his back if he gets into trouble - and, of course, when the stuff hits the fan, they laugh in his face and say, "We didn't really MEAN for you to do it!"

That's exactly what happened yesterday and from the look on Halperin's face as it dawned on him that he wasn't IN on the joke - he WAS the joke - he knew it. I almost felt sorry for him when, upon realizing his comment had gone out live, he muttered "This could be the end of my career."

Almost, but not quite...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. It wasn't only Mark Halperin who was exposed in this sorry episode
Both Joe and Mika egged him on. The video does not lie.

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/30/fire_halperin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. No, he knew that everyone was listening and he meant to say it.
Rhodes was exposed against his will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. He meant to say it but he DIDN'T expect everyone to hear him
He only said it after he was assured that the 7-second delay would ensure that his comment would be heard only by the people in the studio while the viewers would only hear a bleep - and see the rest of the roundtable collapsed in laughter, thereby proving how witty and cool he was.

Of course, that's not how it went down. The failure to use the delay meant the viewers also heard what he had to say - and he didn't come across as witty and cool at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. And thereby everyone would think he said something even worse.
And he'd probably get suspended for it. I don't think the delay had anything to do with it.

Did you ever see A FACE IN THE CROWD? This instance was not like that at all. It wasn't even a Ronald Reagan live mic gaffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, I've seen A Face in the Crowd many times - and this analogy is dead on
Edited on Fri Jul-01-11 11:25 AM by EffieBlack
Lonesome Rhodes was talking to a small group of people in the studio - but he was viciously criticizing his viewers, bragging about how he was conning and controlling them, etc., - all the while believing that the television audience could see him but couldn't hear what he was saying. Marcia flipped the switch in the control room and turned on his microphone so the audience could hear him.

That's pretty much what happened here. Like Lonesome Rhodes, Halperin was showing off for the small group of people in the studio. Like Lonesome Rhodes, he knew just what he was saying and he meant to say just what he said. And just like Lonesome Rhodes, he didn't intend for the viewers to actually hear what he said. He thought the producer would cut off his mike retroactively and keep the audience from hearing what he said.

And like Marcia, the Morning Joe producer, in essence, "flipped the switch" by NOT cutting off his mike.

I see the similarity very clearly. Apparently, you don't agree. So be it . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And I think that Halperin FULLY EXPECTED everyone to hear
what he said. Don't fall for that switch business. That show has a 7 second delay. That's a LONG time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masmdu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Not like L.R. I think you miss the point...
Edited on Fri Jul-01-11 12:37 PM by masmdu
L.R's downfall was a result of the exposure of his contempt for those who he supposedly represented.

That is not what happened here. He, Halperin, was just caught out being a foul mouthed jerk/dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I wasn't drilling down that deep . . .
I'm not saying that this is point-by-point identical to A Face in the Crowd. I'm simply pointing out that, like Lonesome Rhodes, Mark Halperin was exposed saying something he didn't want the audience to hear - and this occurred as a result of someone allowing his mic to be live and thus, have his words (as Alan Swann would say) go into the camera and spill out into people's living rooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. I did not even think about that.. you think someone left the mike on on purpose
Oh you are good!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Empowerer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm not saying the producer purposely failed to use the delay - just that the result is the same. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC