Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kennedy won't run for Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 05:58 PM
Original message
Kennedy won't run for Senate
~~~snip~~~

The son of the late U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy says he won’t run for the seat held by retiring Connecticut U.S. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, I-Conn., because he wants to spend more time with his two children.

WFSB-TV reports that Edward M. Kennedy Jr., a Branford resident, made the statement at the JKF Legacy Dinner on Tuesday night. The event marks the 50th anniversary of the inauguration of President John F. Kennedy.

“It’s something I’ve thought a lot about, and I think at this point in time, I’ll have to say that I think I’ll have to wait before I make the plunge into a campaign,” Kennedy told the TV station.


~~~snip~~~

http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2011/02/16/news/doc4d5c261ea2fdb168999909.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. DAMN!! what's up with the Kennedy's the last couple of years not wanting to get in politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Maybe they don't want to get shot by some
angry, crazed Republican...especially after what happened to Gabby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's too bad
But we should respect his right to have his life stay private. This looks like a trend with the Kennedy's where no one wants to take the family back into the spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good
I do not like the idea of hereditary seats, or entitled families, or the near-deification of the Kennedys. The same goes double for Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. How About Lamont?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think Lamont is running out of chances.
Has yet to prove he can close the deal. Got spanked in the Gubernatorial primary this last cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Lamont pissed off volunteers for his 06 Senate campaign when he was quoted in the NYT
during last fall's Dem gubernatorial primary that he "really didn't want the Senate seat after all." Thanks a bunch, Ned.

He also didn't come across very seriously with that slogan he had "I'm my own man." It sounded silly coming out of his mouth.

I like Malloy. He seems to enjoy being in office, even tho he has had to make cuts in the state budget and to raise taxes (but progressively).

The pukes are screaming but what was their beloved "mother" Rell doing in her years as governor of CT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I've soured on Lamont.
Really liked him during the '06 Senate race. Since then, though, it seems like he's all talk and no show. Also seems to be a bit of a phony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. (sigh) and I'm afraid the argument I heard from Dems I called leading up to the 06 primary
was basically correct: Lamont was indulging in a rich man's illusion. He hadn't really walked the walk and I think Malloy certainly has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Malloy has.
Although I don't agree with several of his tax increase proposals. But I think Malloy has handled the budget crisis well so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. terrible news we need more Kennedys in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC