Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REPORT: 49 GOP Congressional Candidates Join Ginni Thomas-Led Assault On Education

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 02:06 PM
Original message
REPORT: 49 GOP Congressional Candidates Join Ginni Thomas-Led Assault On Education

REPORT: 49 GOP Congressional Candidates Join Ginni Thomas-Led Assault On Education

Senate candidates Ken Buck (R-CO) and Sharron Angle (R-NV) have both received significant attention for their absurd claim the federal Department of Education is unconstitutional, but because House races generally receive much less media attention than the higher-profile Senate contests, it’s unclear just how common this radical position is among the GOP’s full slate of candidates.

A questionnaire circulated by Liberty Central, the right-wing group led by Supreme Court spouse Ginni Thomas, sheds a great deal of light on this question — and the answer is not pretty. Of the 60 candidate questionnaires submitted by current GOP nominees for a House or Senate seat that ThinkProgress reviewed for this report, at least 49 adopt a view that would declare much — if not all — of federal education policy unconstitutional.

The Liberty Central questionnaire includes the following question:



The overwhelming majority of GOP candidates who submitted this questionnaire answered “no” to this question, a position that would drastically limit the federal government’s ability to help struggling schools, and which could also threaten Medicaid and other essential programs. Several of these candidates offered ahistorical, ideological and occasionally paranoid constitutional theories:

<...>

In other words, just like the many GOP Senate candidates who believe that the Constitution means whatever they want it to mean, much of the Republican slate of House candidates have no compunctions about inventing new and incoherent ways of reading the document in order to undermine laws they don’t like. For more on the implications of Ginni Thomas’ positions on essential programs such as Medicaid, and for a full list of the 49 Republican Congressional candidates endorsing her group’s vision of the Constitution, visit the Wonk Room.

Looks like Republicans aren't going to stop until they repeal the Constitution.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are they going to join Ginni T in assaulting truth, too?
Edited on Mon Oct-25-10 02:12 PM by SpiralHawk
Or are they all too busy watching Republicon Family Values Videos (Nudge,nudge, wink, wink)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, at least, if this issue is ever presented to Supremes,
there will only be 8 members voting!

Sorry, you dumb broad! (ginni, that is)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. If you think about it
At the time of the Revolutionary War the conservatives would have been the Tories and sided with King George. Look at them now they want a moneyed aristocracy where leaders have a 'divine right' (meaning they are in their position by God's will, well actually because they protect the uber-rich) and the rest of us are serfs to do their bidding, fight their holy wars and maintain their palatial mansions. They also want to void the constitution and go back to a 'church run' theocratic way of law (of course what that means is that they state their personal opinion and then find some line in the Bible to try and show that it is God's will). By their ideas the rich are rich because of God's will, he wants them to be rich. The poor are poor because they are lazy losers and deserve whatever life does to them. The middle class, well we don't really need a middle class unless you consider the 'trade guilds' as representative of 'middle class living'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC