Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil Spill Panel: White House Blocked Federal Scientists From Releasing Worst-Case Scenario For Gulf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:10 PM
Original message
Oil Spill Panel: White House Blocked Federal Scientists From Releasing Worst-Case Scenario For Gulf
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration blocked efforts by government scientists to tell the public just how bad the Gulf oil spill could become and committed other missteps that raised questions about its competence and candor during the crisis, according to a commission appointed by the president to investigate the disaster.

In documents released Wednesday, the national oil spill commission's staff describes "not an incidental public relations problem" by the White House in the wake of the April 20 accident.

Among other things, the report says, the administration made erroneous early estimates of the spill's size, and President Barack Obama's senior energy adviser went on national TV and mischaracterized a government analysis by saying it showed most of the oil was "gone." The analysis actually said it could still be there.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/06/oil-spill-panel-white-hou_n_752612.html

When I voted for Obama I never thought that big business would dictate what this presidency would and would not report to the American people as being truthful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would like to read the report myself rather than the
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 08:19 PM by Kdillard
media narrative. I have read that nobody came close to the accurate reading except for Stephen Chu. Outside scientists came in on the low end so really a whole lot of people were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. OMB denies report it may have suppressed data during BP spill
I don't know; two different stories.


OMB denies report it may have suppressed data during BP spill
By Ben Geman - 10/06/10 04:46 PM ET



The White House is pushing back against a report that it blocked public release of worst-case projections during the early days of the BP oil spill.

The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in a statement Wednesday, said, “senior government officials were clear with the public what the worst-case flow rate could be.”

“In early May, {Interior} Secretary Salazar and Admiral Thad Allen told the American people that the worst case scenario could be more than 100,000 barrels a day,” notes the joint comment from OMB and Jane Lubchenco, who heads the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

The comment comes hours after the presidential commission probing the spill released a draft working paper that said OMB might have blocked NOAA efforts to release worst-case projections of how much oil could flow from BP's ruptured well.

more...

http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/123041-white-house-denies-it-suppressed-oil-flow-data
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. @babylonsister - Scientists were asked why they were still reporting on more spills?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. @Kdillard - Then read!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Read it
Comments here.

Not that the facts matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That is not the panels report. If there is a pdf of the report I am not
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 08:42 PM by Kdillard
seeing fine otherwise I am just not going to have the media take crap and Interpret it for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. AKdillard-WASHINGTON (AP) - Documents released today show the White House blocked efforts by federal
scientists.
Panel finds Gov't failed to tell public worst case scenario on BP oil spill.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39543397
Would you believe it if it came from Obama himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Outside scientists came in Because Prsident Obama asked them to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who appointed the Oil Spill Panel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. @FrenchieCat- Panel appointed by Obama to investigate the worst offshore oil spill in U.S …
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. So what does Obama's Panel that he appointed and the article have to say about this.....?
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 08:40 PM by FrenchieCat
“In early May, {Interior} Secretary Salazar and Admiral Thad Allen told the American people that the worst case scenario could be more than 100,000 barrels a day,” notes the joint comment from OMB and Jane Lubchenco, who heads the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).


May 2nd CNN Interview transcript:
SALAZAR: From day one, there has been the assumption here on the worst-case scenario. And so the--

CROWLEY: What is the worst-case scenario, while we're on that?

SALAZAR: The worst-case scenario is we could have 100,000 barrels or more of oil flowing out. And the requirements BP has is to have the capability to respond to that kind of a spill. And it means doing everything that's going on, including containing the well down at the bottom, mitigating the impacts on the sea, mitigating impacts as things happen on shore.
http://archives.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1005/02/sotu.01.html


SO WHAT SAY YOU? Was a CNN interview not public enough?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Secretary Salazar and Admiral Thad Allen told the American people bla-bla-bla!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. @FrenchieCat -Google it this is is old news - ru kidding!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
discopants Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. "... just how bad the Gulf oil spill could become...
Quote :"locked efforts by government scientists to tell the public just how bad the Gulf oil spill could become."

So today's Obama Outrage is about speculation of a possible disaster senario that the Administration did not go public with. Okay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. The oil just seems to have disappeared? repugs believe it and so do Dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. "big business would dictate this presidency"?? The Chamber of Commerce & BP would disagree w/you
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 08:47 PM by ClarkUSA
Thanks for posting the latest bullshit-stirring anti-Obama narrative from HuffPo.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The Chamber of Commerce & BP would disagree w/you (?) hahahahahaha... so funny;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. What's funny about the truth? Your meme is both false and baseless. nt
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 08:57 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. This merits discussion, not poo flinging. Did they or didn't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC